ON
← Retour au fil
Delhi HC tells Centre to decide within 15 days on removing Dhruv Rathee's video on Hindu deities
India🏛️ Politiqueil y a 15 h

Delhi HC tells Centre to decide within 15 days on removing Dhruv Rathee's video on Hindu deities

The Delhi High Court has instructed the Union government's Grievance Appellate Committee to decide within 15 days whether to remove a video by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, which discusses the dietary habits of Hindu deities like Ram and Krishna. The video, uploaded on March 21, claims these deities consumed meat and alcohol, leading to an appeal by lawyer Amita Sachdeva who alleges the content is derogatory and inflames communal tensions. The government's counsel argued that YouTube should remove the video, citing potential harm to religious sentiments, while Google's representative stated the company had responded to the complaint. The court emphasized that failure to comply would be treated seriously, and Sachdeva has also filed a criminal complaint alleging distortion of Hindu scriptures.

Aller aux sources primaires (3)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

1 articles

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndépendantDroiteFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 15 h
Delhi HC tells Centre to decide within 15 days on removing Dhruv Rathee's video on Hindu deities

The Delhi High Court has instructed the Union government's Grievance Appellate Committee to decide within 15 days whether to remove a video by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, which discusses the dietary habits of Hindu deities like Ram and Krishna. The video, uploaded on March 21, claims these deities consumed meat and alcohol, leading to an appeal by lawyer Amita Sachdeva who alleges the content is derogatory and inflames communal tensions. The government's counsel argued that YouTube should remove the video, citing potential harm to religious sentiments, while Google's representative stated the company had responded to the complaint. The court emphasized that failure to comply would be treated seriously, and Sachdeva has also filed a criminal complaint alleging distortion of Hindu scriptures.

Lecture du biais (Droite): The article frames the issue through the lens of protecting religious sentiments and communal harmony, emphasizing the 'derogatory' nature of the video and the potential harm to the 'majority community.' The language used suggests a concern for maintaining social cohesion and religious respect, with

Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 85 · Objectivité 75): The article accurately reports the court's directive and the details of the case, aligning closely with the primary source. It presents both sides of the argument, though it leans slightly towards the legal proceedings and the concerns raised by Sachdeva.

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés