ON
← Retour au fil
Contractor which wrongly cleared saplings in Central Catchment Nature Reserve warned; trees replanted
SG🏛️ Politiqueil y a 3 j

Contractor which wrongly cleared saplings in Central Catchment Nature Reserve warned; trees replanted

A contractor involved in maintaining trails at Singapore's Lower Peirce Reservoir Park mistakenly cleared saplings planted as part of the OneMillionTrees greening initiative. The National Parks Board (NParks) investigated and found the error stemmed from a misunderstanding of storage instructions left by a supervisor on overseas leave. NParks replanted 60 new plants in the affected area, which was approximately half the size of a badminton court. The contractor and project supervisor admitted fault and agreed to cover replanting and maintenance costs. NParks issued a 24-month conditional warning, allowing potential legal action if further offenses occur. The incident was reported by a member of the public who shared photos online, prompting NParks to verify the replanted species match those originally planted.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

1 articles

The Straits Times logoThe Straits TimesLié à un parti🔒CentreFactualité 85Objectivité 90il y a 3 j
Contractor which wrongly cleared saplings in Central Catchment Nature Reserve warned; trees replanted

A contractor involved in maintaining trails at Singapore's Lower Peirce Reservoir Park mistakenly cleared saplings planted as part of the OneMillionTrees greening initiative. The National Parks Board (NParks) investigated and found the error stemmed from a misunderstanding of storage instructions left by a supervisor on overseas leave. NParks replanted 60 new plants in the affected area, which was approximately half the size of a badminton court. The contractor and project supervisor admitted fault and agreed to cover replanting and maintenance costs. NParks issued a 24-month conditional warning, allowing potential legal action if further offenses occur. The incident was reported by a member of the public who shared photos online, prompting NParks to verify the replanted species match those originally planted.

Lecture du biais (Centre): The article presents a factual account of an administrative error involving a contractor and the National Parks Board. It does not take a clear ideological stance, nor does it emphasize any particular political agenda. The focus remains on the procedural and regulatory response to the incident, with

Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 85 · Objectivité 90): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the incident, the response from NParks, and the consequences for the contractor. It provides specific details like dates, locations, and quotes from officials. Objectivity is strong as the article presents the situation neutrally, without apparent

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés