A senior official from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) has voiced frustration over the limitations imposed by the country’s long-standing bank secrecy laws, particularly in relation to the ongoing impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte. During a ceremony marking the signing of an information-sharing agreement between the BSP and the Department of Justice, Deputy Governor Elmore Capule highlighted how these laws hinder investigations into potential financial misconduct. The issue came to light after the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, attempted to subpoena bank and anti-money laundering council (AMLC) records related to Duterte, her husband Manases Carpio, and their associated businesses. However, the court found itself unable to access foreign currency deposits due to stricter protections under the Foreign Currency Deposit Act. Capule emphasized the disparity between the Bank Secrecy Law, which permits bank inquiries in impeachment cases, and the Foreign Currency Deposit Act, which mandates written consent from the account holder before any examination. This distinction left prosecutors with incomplete data, despite having obtained the court’s approval. The exclusion of foreign currency deposits from the subpoenas raised concerns among investigators who were seeking to establish a comprehensive financial profile of the individuals involved in the case. During the event, Capule recounted his early experiences with the challenges posed by bank secrecy laws. One of his initial encounters with potential government corruption involved a state-owned corporation transferring funds to a private account during the EDSA revolution. At the time, Capule advocated for the right to examine such accounts, arguing that the deposited money was already under litigation. After a lengthy process, the court eventually ruled in favor of the investigation, but by then, the funds had been moved, rendering them effectively inaccessible. This experience underscored the difficulties faced by investigators trying to trace illicit financial activities through existing legal frameworks. Capule further criticized the evolution of bank secrecy policies, noting how they have become intertwined with the Anti-Money Laundering Act. He expressed concern that other countries view the combination of bank secrecy and money laundering provisions as contradictory, questioning the logic behind such a legislative approach. Despite his criticisms, Capule clarified that he did not assert that Duterte possessed undisclosed foreign currency deposits or that any account contained illegal proceeds. His primary concern lay in the continued existence of bank secrecy laws that could potentially shield criminal activity from scrutiny. The Senate’s decision to subpoena records involving Duterte marks a significant step in the impeachment process, aiming to uncover any discrepancies in her financial disclosures. The prosecution seeks to compare the couple’s declared income, assets, liabilities, and business interests with the financial records obtained through the subpoenas. This move comes amid broader discussions about the need for reform in financial regulations to ensure transparency and accountability in high-profile cases. As the impeachment trial progresses, the limitations imposed by current bank secrecy laws will likely continue to pose challenges for investigators. The situation highlights the urgent need for legislative review and potential amendments to address gaps in the existing framework. With the Senate poised to play a crucial role in determining the outcome of the proceedings, the implications of these legal constraints on the effectiveness of the impeachment process remain to be fully realized.
6 articles
RapplerIndépendantProgressisteFactualité 95Objectivité 85il y a 10 jUn haut fonctionnaire de Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), le vice-gouverneur Elmore Capule, a critiqué les lois sur le secret bancaire obsolètes des Philippines après que la tentative de l'accusation de la Chambre d'examiner les dossiers financiers du vice-président Sara Duterte ait été bloquée par les protections des dépôts en devises étrangères. La cour d'impeachment du Sénat avait ordonné l'ouverture des dépôts bancaires, mais les unités de dépôt en devises étrangères (FCDU) sont restées inaccessibles en raison de protections plus strictes en vertu de la loi sur les dépôts en devises étrangères.
Lecture du biais (Progressiste): L'article présente le problème comme un échec systémique des réglementations financières actuelles pour prévenir les abus, en particulier dans les affaires politiques de haut niveau comme la destitution de la vice-présidente Sara Duterte.
Pourquoi factualité (95): This article provides detailed reporting on a BSP official criticizing outdated bank secrecy laws related to the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte. It includes direct quotes, specific dates, and references to legal procedures, showing strong adherence to factual reporting and alignment with
Pourquoi objectivité (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the facts and legal proceedings without apparent bias. It presents both sides of the issue (the prosecution's request and the court's response) fairly, contributing to its high objectivity score.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndépendantCentreFactualité 90Objectivité 85il y a 15 jSelon Benjamin "Jay" Tolosa Jr., porte-parole juridique de l'équipe de poursuites de la Chambre, l'amélioration des notes de satisfaction de la vice-présidente Sara Duterte ne la protège pas d'une procédure de destitution. Tolosa a souligné que la responsabilité constitutionnelle est basée sur des preuves et non sur l'approbation du public.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente les arguments des deux côtés du processus de destitution sans favoriser ouvertement une perspective.
Pourquoi factualité (90): The article accurately reports on Rep. Terry Ridon’s concerns about the authenticity of the recipients of confidential funds. It details the potential implications of fictitious names and the need for verification, which aligns with the legal and investigative processes described in the primary sour
Pourquoi objectivité (85): The article presents the concerns of the prosecution objectively, without introducing personal opinions or emotional language. It focuses on the legal and evidentiary challenges facing the defense.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndépendantCentreFactualité 90Objectivité 80il y a 18 j L'accusation ne présentera plus Lopez: le témoignage est redondantL'avocate Lorna Kapunan, représentant l'équipe de poursuites de la Chambre des représentants, a déclaré que l'équipe n'appellera plus Zuleika Lopez, le chef d'état-major du bureau du vice-président, comme témoin dans le procès d'impeachment du vice-président Sara Duterte. Kapunan a fait valoir que le témoignage de Lopez serait redondant, car d'autres témoins ont déjà fourni des informations similaires, y compris le capitaine Belinda Bello, qui était impliqué dans des questions de sécurité pendant le mandat de Duterte à la Chambre.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente la décision de l'équipe de l'accusation d'abandonner Zuleika Lopez en tant que témoin, invoquant la redondance plutôt que toute inclinaison idéologique manifeste.
Pourquoi factualité (90): The article accurately reports that Terry Ridon challenged the lawyers of Vice President Sara Duterte, urging them to improve their cross-examination. This is consistent with the primary source document detailing the trial's progression and legal arguments. The information is presented factually wit
Pourquoi objectivité (80): While the article is factual, it carries a slightly confrontational tone, implying that the lawyers are not performing adequately. This introduces a subtle element of judgment rather than pure neutrality.
GMA News OnlineIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 90il y a 12 jLa cour de mise en accusation du Sénat a émis des citations à comparaître pour les dossiers bancaires de Sara Duterte, les dossiers du Conseil anti-blanchiment d'argent (AMLC) et les documents fiscaux. Cela fait suite à des enquêtes en cours sur d'éventuelles inconduites pendant son mandat de vice-présidente.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente l'action procédurale prise par la cour de mise en accusation du Sénat sans approuver ou critiquer ouvertement les actions en cours d'enquête.
Pourquoi factualité (85): The article confirms the PNP's deployment of over 20,000 personnel for the Sona, aligning with the previous report. It includes specifics about the number of officers and their roles, consistent with the general context.
Pourquoi objectivité (90): The article is presented objectively, detailing the PNP's actions without introducing subjective commentary or bias.
RapplerIndépendantCentreFactualité 70Objectivité 60il y a 9 j Les garde-côtes chinois utilisent des canons à eau sur les navires philippins.L'article rapporte que les navires de la garde côtière chinoise ont utilisé des canons à eau et des manœuvres dangereuses contre les navires de la garde côtière philippine dans la région de Bajo de Masinloc. La garde côtière philippine allègue que ces actions étaient hostiles et perturbatrices.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente des informations factuelles sur l'incident impliquant des navires chinois et philippins sans favoriser ouvertement l'une ou l'autre des parties.
Pourquoi factualité (70): This article serves more as a compilation of headlines and brief summaries rather than in-depth reporting. While some details are mentioned, such as the Chinese Coast Guard using water cannons, the lack of substantial content and depth reduces its factuality score. It also lacks primary sources or d
Pourquoi objectivité (60): The tone is more journalistic in format, listing various news items without deep exploration. However, the inclusion of emotionally charged headlines like 'Sara Duterte wants the Senate to pay for her defense team’s meals?' introduces a subjective framing, lowering its objectivity.
RapplerIndépendantCentreFactualité 60Objectivité 70il y a 17 j Sur la place publique: Qui regarde le procès de destitution de Sara Duterte ?L'article discute du procès de destitution du vice-président Sara Duterte, en demandant s'il deviendra une leçon civique importante comme les destitutions passées.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article pose une question sur l'intérêt public dans le procès de destitution sans prendre une position claire sur le résultat ou les implications.
Pourquoi factualité (60): The article discusses media coverage and public interest in the trial but doesn't provide substantial factual details about the subpoena ruling or the legal arguments presented in the primary source. It focuses more on commentary than reporting.
Pourquoi objectivité (70): The article is neutral in tone but focuses on analysis rather than factual reporting. It invites reader engagement without taking a clear stance on the issue.
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.
Devenir soutien
PH
