ON
← Retour au fil
Australian aged care firm accused in class action of charging residents for high teas and classes they couldn’t use
United Kingdom🏛️ Politiqueil y a 12 h

Australian aged care firm accused in class action of charging residents for high teas and classes they couldn’t use

Residents at over 50 Arcare aged care facilities in Australia have initiated a class action lawsuit against the for-profit provider, alleging illegal charges for services like high teas and exercise classes that residents could not use due to mobility or cognitive impairments. The lawsuit claims Arcare charged 'additional services fees' as part of a mandatory 'signature package' between July 2020 and July 2026, which included services already legally required to be provided. According to aged care legislation, providers can only charge for additional services if residents agree, can access and benefit from them, and have the capacity to use them. The claimants argue that residents were in an unequal bargaining position, relying on aged care for medical or social needs, and were told the signature package was non-negotiable. Arcare has not yet responded to the lawsuit, and a spokesperson stated the company would not comment while the matter is before the court. The lawsuit also alleges that some residents on strict dietary regimes or lacking capacity to operate technology were charged for items like Foxtel, newspapers, and wireless internet.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Aller aux sources primaires (1)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

1 articles

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndépendantGaucheil y a 12 h
Australian aged care firm accused in class action of charging residents for high teas and classes they couldn’t use

Residents at over 50 Arcare aged care facilities in Australia have initiated a class action lawsuit against the for-profit provider, alleging illegal charges for services like high teas and exercise classes that residents could not use due to mobility or cognitive impairments. The lawsuit claims Arcare charged 'additional services fees' as part of a mandatory 'signature package' between July 2020 and July 2026, which included services already legally required to be provided. According to aged care legislation, providers can only charge for additional services if residents agree, can access and benefit from them, and have the capacity to use them. The claimants argue that residents were in an unequal bargaining position, relying on aged care for medical or social needs, and were told the signature package was non-negotiable. Arcare has not yet responded to the lawsuit, and a spokesperson stated the company would not comment while the matter is before the court. The lawsuit also alleges that some residents on strict dietary regimes or lacking capacity to operate technology were charged for items like Foxtel, newspapers, and wireless internet.

Lecture du biais (Gauche): The article frames the issue as a violation of residents' rights and highlights systemic unfairness in the aged care industry, emphasizing the power imbalance between residents and the for-profit provider. It uses terms like 'unconscionable conduct,' 'mandatory services,' and 'unequal bargaining' to

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés