L'association de football argentine dément les informations selon lesquelles Tapia aurait été convoqué par les tribunaux américains

Argentina’s football association has denied reports that its president, Claudio Tapia, or treasurer, Pablo Toviggino, were summoned by U.S. courts. In a statement issued on Wednesday, the Argentine Football Association (AFA) called such claims “completely untrue,” asserting that neither Tapia nor Toviggino had been asked to testify or have their personal devices seized by American authorities. According to local media, FBI agents reportedly detained Tapia and requested access to his mobile devices prior to a charter flight departing from New York. This occurred as the Argentina national team prepared to travel abroad. However, the AFA clarified that the U.S. court summons was not addressed to Tapia or Toviggino, but rather to a third party, whose identity was not disclosed. The summons required this individual to appear before a grand jury and possibly provide documents and communications related to several individuals, including AFA officials. The AFA further stated that no electronic devices belonging to Tapia or Toviggino were confiscated. The organization emphasized that the situation involving the third party does not pertain to the leadership of the AFA itself. It is unclear whether the third party is affiliated with the association or another entity connected to the ongoing investigations. Earlier reports suggested that U.S. authorities are examining over $300 million in commercial contracts linked to the AFA. These inquiries come amid broader scrutiny of financial practices within Argentine football, particularly after December raids associated with a money-laundering investigation. Infobae, a local news outlet, noted that these probes have intensified pressure on the administration of the sport in Argentina, raising concerns about transparency and accountability. The allegations against the AFA stem from suspicions of improper financial dealings, including potential conflicts of interest and mismanagement of funds. While the exact nature of the U.S. investigation remains undisclosed, the involvement of federal agencies suggests that the matter could have international implications. The AFA’s denial underscores the complexity of the situation, as it seeks to distance itself from accusations that might affect its reputation both domestically and internationally. In response to the controversy, the AFA has maintained that it operates within legal boundaries and adheres to ethical standards. However, the ongoing investigations highlight the challenges faced by sports governing bodies in maintaining fiscal integrity under increased regulatory scrutiny. The outcome of these proceedings could influence future policies and governance structures within Argentine football. As the situation unfolds, the focus will remain on the identities of those implicated in the U.S. investigation and the extent of their involvement. The AFA’s stance that the summons pertains to a third party adds layers of uncertainty, leaving many questions unanswered. The association continues to assert its innocence while navigating the complexities of an evolving legal landscape.