ON
← Retour au fil
Alfonso Gómez Méndez explique pourquoi il a fermé l'affaire d'Álvaro Uribe pour le massacre d'El Aro en 2000: Les preuves n'étaient pas suffisantes
CO🏛️ Politiqueil y a 12 h

Alfonso Gómez Méndez explique pourquoi il a fermé l'affaire d'Álvaro Uribe pour le massacre d'El Aro en 2000: Les preuves n'étaient pas suffisantes

The former president Álvaro Uribe Vélez has been summoned before the Attorney General’s Office on July 24 to face an investigation related to the massacres of El Aro and La Granja, which occurred in 1996 and 1997 during his tenure as governor of Antioquia. Uribe’s defense team is preparing evidence to prove his innocence, citing concerns over the lack of testimonial, documentary, and technical evidence. The case was previously stalled by the Attorney General’s Office in 2000 under then-Fiscal General Alfonso Gómez Méndez, who explained that an injunction was issued due to insufficient evidence. Gómez Méndez stated that the decision was based on the evaluation of available materials, particularly regarding alleged omissions. He noted that the injunction was not appealed at the time and remained in effect until the office of Fiscal Eduardo Montealegre revoked it in 2012–2014, possibly due to new evidence.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

1 articles

Semana logoSemanaIndépendantCentreil y a 12 h
Alfonso Gómez Méndez explique pourquoi il a fermé l'affaire d'Álvaro Uribe pour le massacre d'El Aro en 2000: Les preuves n'étaient pas suffisantes

The former president Álvaro Uribe Vélez has been summoned before the Attorney General’s Office on July 24 to face an investigation related to the massacres of El Aro and La Granja, which occurred in 1996 and 1997 during his tenure as governor of Antioquia. Uribe’s defense team is preparing evidence to prove his innocence, citing concerns over the lack of testimonial, documentary, and technical evidence. The case was previously stalled by the Attorney General’s Office in 2000 under then-Fiscal General Alfonso Gómez Méndez, who explained that an injunction was issued due to insufficient evidence. Gómez Méndez stated that the decision was based on the evaluation of available materials, particularly regarding alleged omissions. He noted that the injunction was not appealed at the time and remained in effect until the office of Fiscal Eduardo Montealegre revoked it in 2012–2014, possibly due to new evidence.

Lecture du biais (Centre): The article presents both sides of the issue—Uribe’s legal challenge and Gómez Méndez’s explanation for past decisions—without overtly favoring either side. While the subject involves high-profile political figures and legal proceedings, the framing remains balanced, focusing on factual explanations

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés