ON
← Retour au fil
Alan Dershowitz se retire de l'audience d'Epstein, déclenchant une menace de citation à comparaître
United States🏛️ PolitiqueCentreil y a 8 h

Alan Dershowitz se retire de l'audience d'Epstein, déclenchant une menace de citation à comparaître

Le comité de surveillance et de réforme du gouvernement de la Chambre des représentants a menacé de citation à comparaître du juriste Alan Dershowitz s'il ne témoignait pas au sujet de sa relation passée avec le délinquant sexuel condamné Jeffrey Epstein. Dershowitz, ancien professeur de droit à Harvard qui a conseillé Epstein jusqu'en 2019, a d'abord accepté de comparaître devant le comité, mais s'est retiré à la dernière minute. Le président du comité, James Comer, a critiqué Dershowitz pour avoir omis de fournir une raison de son absence et lui a ordonné de subir une entrevue à huis clos.

Alan Dershowitz, the renowned criminal defense attorney and former Harvard Law professor, has withdrawn from a congressional hearing regarding his past association with Jeffrey Epstein, prompting the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to threaten a subpoena. The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, stated that Mr. Dershowitz had previously expressed willingness to testify about his relationship with Epstein but ultimately declined to appear for the scheduled hearing on Monday. In response, Mr. Comer issued a formal letter to Mr. Dershowitz, stating that his legal team had failed to provide a valid explanation for his absence and that this was unacceptable. The Oversight Committee is investigating Epstein's alleged involvement in sex trafficking, focusing on his connections with individuals such as Mr. Dershowitz. According to the committee, Mr. Dershowitz had served as a legal advisor to Epstein until their relationship ended in 2007 after Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges involving the solicitation of prostitution from a minor. Despite the termination of their professional ties, emails obtained from Epstein’s files reveal that Mr. Dershowitz maintained communication with him and continued to offer legal guidance up until 2019, the year Epstein died. Prior to his withdrawal, Mr. Dershowitz had shown interest in cooperating with the committee. He had participated in discussions about Epstein’s conduct, describing the financier’s behavior toward young women as concerning but not necessarily illegal. During a May interview on the podcast “Pod Force One,” Mr. Dershowitz claimed that Epstein was interested in teenagers aged 16 to 18, which he did not classify as pedophilia. Instead, he suggested that Epstein engaged in a form of transactional relationships, offering money in exchange for services such as massages. He further argued that some of the girls who received financial compensation from a victim fund had not actually met Epstein and were instead influenced by others to claim they had done so. Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York City jail in 2019 while awaiting federal charges, was accused of orchestrating a widespread sex trafficking network. His co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serves a 20-year prison sentence for her role in facilitating these crimes. The Oversight Committee has been conducting a broad inquiry into Epstein’s operations, interviewing numerous high-profile figures linked to him, including Bill Gates and former President Bill Clinton. Among the upcoming witnesses is Jes Staley, a former banking executive whose career was impacted by his ties to Epstein. Staley recently lost an appeal against a UK financial regulator’s decision to bar him from the industry due to those connections. Despite the extensive list of witnesses, all have denied any direct participation in or awareness of Epstein’s alleged crimes. As the committee continues its investigation, the potential subpoena of Mr. Dershowitz underscores the seriousness of the inquiry and the pressure being placed on individuals with historical ties to Epstein. The situation highlights the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Epstein’s legacy and the broader implications of his alleged activities.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

1 articles

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesLié à un partiCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 8 h
Alan Dershowitz se retire de l'audience d'Epstein, déclenchant une menace de citation à comparaître

Le comité de surveillance et de réforme du gouvernement de la Chambre des représentants a menacé de citation à comparaître du juriste Alan Dershowitz s'il ne témoignait pas au sujet de sa relation passée avec le délinquant sexuel condamné Jeffrey Epstein. Dershowitz, ancien professeur de droit à Harvard qui a conseillé Epstein jusqu'en 2019, a d'abord accepté de comparaître devant le comité, mais s'est retiré à la dernière minute. Le président du comité, James Comer, a critiqué Dershowitz pour avoir omis de fournir une raison de son absence et lui a ordonné de subir une entrevue à huis clos.

Lecture du biais (Centre): Bien que le sujet soit politiquement sensible, lié au trafic sexuel et à la responsabilité juridique, l'article présente à la fois les actions du comité et les affirmations de Dershowitz sans favoriser ouvertement aucune des deux parties.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article provides details about Alan Dershowitz's refusal to testify and the committee's response, citing emails showing ongoing contact with Epstein until 2019. It references public statements and interviews, aligning with cross-source reporting on the topic. However, it does not include direct

Pourquoi objectivité (75): The article presents the situation from the perspective of the House Oversight Committee, emphasizing their stance and actions. While it reports facts neutrally, it uses terms like 'sex trafficker' and 'terrible thing' which may carry subjective weight, suggesting a slight editorial lean towards con

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés