ON
← Volver al feed
La WNBA ha cortado la cinta: Kanter Freedom y Royce White quedan sin derecho a jugar.
Croatia🏛️ PolíticaCentrohace 6 h

La WNBA ha cortado la cinta: Kanter Freedom y Royce White quedan sin derecho a jugar.

El artículo informa sobre la decisión de la WNBA de negar los derechos de participación a las ex jugadoras de la NBA Enes Kanter Freedom y Royce White, que se habían declarado mujeres y buscaban entrar en la temporada 2026-2027. La WNBA declaró que sus acciones se basaban en el acuerdo de negociación colectiva de la liga, que define explícitamente la elegibilidad por género. La liga enfatizó que no permitiría más discusiones sobre este asunto debido a presiones externas o controversias innecesarias.

The WNBA has officially denied entry to former NBA players Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White, who had attempted to participate in the league under female identities. According to unattributed sources within the league, both individuals were barred from competing in the 2026–2027 season after declaring themselves as women and seeking eligibility through the draft. The decision was made following a series of public appearances and statements by Kanter Freedom and White, which the league described as unnecessary and potentially harmful to its institutional integrity. Kanter Freedom and Royce White publicly announced their intention to compete in the WNBA as women, aiming to assert their right to play in the league. Over the past several weeks, they filled media spaces with what some have called absurd and attention-seeking performances. However, according to an unnamed insider, these efforts were viewed as nothing more than a publicity stunt. The league’s leadership emphasized that such actions were not aligned with its values and would not be tolerated. They stated that the WNBA does not intend to provide further media coverage or engage in discussions that could be perceived as undermining the institution or marginalizing others. The league's front office reiterated that there are no legitimate questions regarding the right to play that require further consideration. “The league can continue discussing this issue, but it will not allow external pressures or unnecessary controversies to dictate any further dialogue,” one source confirmed. The rules governing participation in the WNBA are clear, particularly under Article XIII, Section 1(a), which explicitly states that only female athletes are eligible to compete in the league. This provision leaves little room for interpretation. Despite the official ruling, Kanter Freedom continued his presence at a game between the Indiana Fever and the Chicago Sky in Chicago. He sat in the first row, wearing a black jersey with the message: “Woman (noun): an adult human being of female sex.” During the third quarter, he became involved in a verbal altercation with Natasha Cloud, a player for the Chicago Sky. Cloud had celebrated a basket by colliding her chest with teammate Aicha Coulibaly and turned toward Kanter Freedom, whom she referred to as a “fake woman.” The confrontation escalated quickly, leading to Kanter Freedom being escorted out of the arena by security personnel. Front Office Sports journalist witnessed the incident and noted that Kanter Freedom, while being removed, shouted, “I’m supporting women, so why did you kick me out?” His statement, though emotionally charged, was met with skepticism. The situation highlighted the tension between personal expression and the strict policies of professional sports organizations. Natasha Cloud did not make any formal statements to the press following the incident, but she reportedly spoke directly with league officials and security services. It is anticipated that Kanter Freedom will be prohibited from attending future games, given the nature of his actions and the league’s stance on maintaining order and respect. This controversy comes amid ongoing discussions within the WNBA about whether transgender women, those who have undergone gender transition to align with their identity, should be allowed to compete in the league. To date, no such cases have been documented. The league continues to navigate these complex issues, balancing inclusivity with the need to uphold competitive fairness. Kanter Freedom later posted on social media, expressing frustration over being excluded from the game despite his support for women. “They just kicked me out of the game @WNBA because I support WOMEN! Think about it, AMERICAN!” His comments sparked further debate, drawing attention to the broader conversation around gender identity in sports. While the WNBA has taken a firm stance against what it views as disruptive behavior, the underlying issues surrounding gender and inclusion remain unresolved.

1 informaciones

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependienteCentroVeracidad 85Objetividad 60hace 6 h
La WNBA ha cortado la cinta: Kanter Freedom y Royce White quedan sin derecho a jugar.

El artículo informa sobre la decisión de la WNBA de negar los derechos de participación a las ex jugadoras de la NBA Enes Kanter Freedom y Royce White, que se habían declarado mujeres y buscaban entrar en la temporada 2026-2027. La WNBA declaró que sus acciones se basaban en el acuerdo de negociación colectiva de la liga, que define explícitamente la elegibilidad por género. La liga enfatizó que no permitiría más discusiones sobre este asunto debido a presiones externas o controversias innecesarias.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta la postura de la WNBA como una decisión clara y basada en reglas basada en acuerdos contractuales, sin criticar ni elogiar abiertamente a ninguna de las partes.

Por qué veracidad (85): The article reports on the WNBA's decision to deny participation rights to Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White, who claimed to be women seeking to play in the league. It cites unnamed sources from the league and mentions specific clauses in the collective bargaining agreement (Article XIII, Section

Por qué objetividad (60): The tone of the article leans towards criticism of Kanter Freedom and White, suggesting their actions are misguided or even promotional. The language used implies judgment, such as calling their public appearances 'nepotrebnim' and labeling their efforts as a 'promidžbeni trik.' This reflects a bias

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

El mismo suceso, agrupado por la inclinación política de los medios que lo cubren.

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Cobertura en el mundo

El mismo suceso según se informó en otros países.

Cobertura en el mundo

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Verificación de afirmaciones

Las principales afirmaciones fácticas y cuántas fuentes las respaldan o las rebaten.

Verificación de afirmaciones

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 4 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas