ON
← Volver al feed
¿Por qué los EE.UU. atacan la infraestructura civil del sur de Irán?
Qatar🏛️ PolíticaCentrohace 23 h

¿Por qué los EE.UU. atacan la infraestructura civil del sur de Irán?

Estados Unidos ha intensificado su campaña militar contra Irán, con funcionarios iraníes acusando a Washington de atacar infraestructura civil. En las últimas seis noches, las fuerzas estadounidenses han atacado estaciones de ferrocarril, vecindarios residenciales, puentes, instalaciones de agua, silos de alimentos y otras estructuras civiles en el sur de Irán. Estos ataques siguen a las declaraciones del ex presidente Donald Trump, quien sugirió que Estados Unidos eventualmente atacaría el sector energético de Irán. Las tensiones se han intensificado aún más cuando Irán afirma haber atacado aviones estadounidenses en Bahréin, mientras que Kuwait informa de responder a ataques de misiles y drones. El conflicto, que comenzó el 28 de febrero con ataques israelíes y estadounidenses contra Irán, ha visto a ambas partes acusarse mutuamente de violar un reciente acuerdo de alto el fuego. Los ataques han generado preocupaciones sobre el cumplimiento de la ley internacional y el riesgo de escalar en una guerra más amplia. El enfoque en la infraestructura civil de Estados Unidos ha provocado debates sobre los objetivos estratégicos potenciales, incluidos los preparativos para una invasión terrestre o el aumento de las presiones económicas y políticas.

The United States has escalated its military operations against Iran, targeting civilian infrastructure in southern Iran for the sixth consecutive night. According to Iranian officials, the attacks have struck a railway station and residential neighborhoods, alongside bridges, water facilities, food silos, and other critical infrastructure. These strikes follow comments by U.S. President Donald Trump, who suggested Washington might eventually target Iran's energy sector, stating he would "save the energy targets for last." Tensions have risen significantly, with Iran's military claiming to have struck U.S. aircraft at a military base in Bahrain. Meanwhile, Kuwait has responded to missile and drone attacks, and air defense systems have been activated across several Middle Eastern nations including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan. This renewed conflict follows a month-long ceasefire agreement signed between Washington and Tehran, intended to provide a framework for negotiations to end the ongoing war that began on February 28 with Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran. The current escalation coincides with heightened confrontations over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has warned it will block maritime traffic through the strategic waterway following Oman's announcement of a new shipping transit corridor. In response, the U.S. has reinstated a naval blockade around Iranian ports and coastal areas. As these attacks increasingly focus on civilian infrastructure, concerns are growing regarding the U.S.'s strategic goals, whether they aim to degrade Iran's military capabilities, force negotiations, disrupt essential transport networks, or exert economic and political pressure by damaging infrastructure crucial to daily life. Southern Iran's coastline has faced repeated attacks, with U.S. strikes hitting infrastructure across Hormozgan province and neighboring regions. Explosions have been reported in multiple locations such as Ahvaz, Qeshm, Bushehr, Dashti, Bostan, Sirik, and Bandar-e Lengeh. Iranian officials claim the damage inflicted in these attacks exceeds that of previous rounds. Bandar Abbas, a major naval hub located near the Strait of Hormuz, has been particularly affected. According to Iranian media reports, two individuals were killed and eight others injured after U.S. strikes targeted the Kahurestan Bridge and a residential area in Bandar Abbas. There are local accounts indicating that a railway facility was damaged as well. Tasnim news agency reported that a communications tower overlooking the city was struck, leading to power outages in surrounding areas. Officials in Hormozgan province, whose capital is Bandar Abbas, stated that six bridges were hit in the latest attacks, impacting key transportation routes connecting Bandar Abbas with nearby towns. These include the Gariyeh Bridge on the Bandar Abbas-Khamir-Lar route, a bridge near Latidan village, two bridges on the Kahurestan-Lar road, a partially constructed bridge on the Bandar Khamir-Keshar-Bandar Abbas axis, and a bridge in Maroo village. Elsewhere, officials noted that Iranshahr Airport in southeastern Iran sustained damage due to an attack, resulting in power outages. Authorities in Semnan reported that the main building of a civil institution was also impacted. A U.S. service member was killed in northern Iraq during a controlled detonation of an explosive device from a downed Iranian drone. This incident occurred a day after two U.S. soldiers were killed and another is missing from an Iranian attack in Jordan. The fatality raises the total number of U.S. soldiers killed since the commencement of the U.S.-Israel war on Iran to 17. The U.S. military confirmed the death of the soldier, stating he was killed on July 18 during the detonation of unexploded ordnance from a downed Iranian drone. Another service member suffered minor injuries during the event. The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) indicated that the remains of the deceased soldier had been discovered at the scene, and identification processes were underway. This announcement followed the U.S. conducting attacks on Iran for an eighth consecutive night, prompting retaliatory actions from Tehran involving missiles and drones directed at U.S. assets in the Gulf. Both nations have increased the intensity of their attacks recently, as the interim ceasefire agreement signed a month earlier has effectively collapsed, intensifying the struggle for control of the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial shipping channel. The conflict has resulted in numerous casualties, primarily within Iran and Lebanon, and has caused substantial disruptions to energy supplies, raising concerns about global inflation. Iran has deployed hundreds of low-cost, highly explosive one-way attack drones known as "Shaheds," which are relatively inexpensive to produce compared to the costly interceptors required to neutralize them. Reports indicate that each Shahed drone costs approximately $30,000 to manufacture, whereas the interceptors used to counter them can cost millions of dollars each and often fail to locate their targets. Recent reports suggest that the U.S. conducted an attack near the city of Sirik in southern Iran and near Shadegan, close to the border with Iraq. An explosion was later reported in Abadan, in Iran's southwest. Additionally, Iran's Atomic Energy Organization criticized a U.S. attack on the site of a nuclear power plant under construction in Darkhovin, as reported by Iran's Mehr news agency. The International Atomic Energy Agency is currently investigating reports of an overnight attack, noting that the plant is still in the initial phase of construction. In response to the latest strikes, Iran executed drone attacks on U.S. military assets and equipment at Kuwait’s Al-Adiri camp and the Ali Al Salem airbase, according to Iranian state television. Kuwait's government stated that a desalination plant had been attacked for the second consecutive day, causing a fire, which it described as a direct strike on vital civilian infrastructure. Bahrain's air defenses also intercepted an Iranian attack on Sunday, as reported by Bahraini state television, while sirens were heard in Jordan, where the military claimed to have shot down three Iranian missiles. Jordan has summoned Iran’s charge d'affaires in protest against recent attacks.

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

El mismo suceso, agrupado por la inclinación política de los medios que lo cubren.

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y tu feed Para ti personalizado.

Hazte suscriptor

Cobertura en el mundo

El mismo suceso según se informó en otros países.

Cobertura en el mundo

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y tu feed Para ti personalizado.

Hazte suscriptor

Verificación de afirmaciones

Las principales afirmaciones fácticas y cuántas fuentes las respaldan o las rebaten.

Verificación de afirmaciones

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y tu feed Para ti personalizado.

Hazte suscriptor

3 informaciones

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishEstatal / públicoCentroVeracidad 75Objetividad 90hace 23 h
Miembro del servicio estadounidense muerto durante la detonación de un avión no tripulado iraní en Irak

Un miembro del servicio estadounidense murió en el norte de Irak durante una detonación controlada de un artefacto explosivo recuperado de un avión no tripulado iraní derribado. Este incidente ocurrió solo un día después de que dos soldados estadounidenses murieran y otro desapareciera en un ataque iraní en Jordania. El evento destaca las tensiones en curso entre Irán y las fuerzas lideradas por Estados Unidos en la región, lo que genera preocupaciones sobre los riesgos que enfrentan los militares en las zonas de conflicto.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta un informe fáctico de un incidente militar sin favorecer abiertamente a ningún lado político, proporciona un contexto equilibrado al mencionar tanto las bajas estadounidenses en Irak como el ataque anterior en Jordania atribuido a Irán, sin tomar una postura clara sobre el anfitrión geopolítico subyacente.

Por qué veracidad (75): The article provides a clear account of a US service member being killed during a controlled detonation of an Iranian drone in Iraq. However, it lacks specific details such as the exact date of the incident, the unit involved, or the nature of the drone. The reference to events in Jordan is mentione

Por qué objetividad (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without apparent bias or emotional language. It cites Al Jazeera’s reporter and does not appear to favor either side in the conflict.

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishEstatal / públicoCentroVeracidad 70Objetividad 85ayer
Soldado estadounidense muerto en Irak durante la "detonación controlada" de un avión no tripulado iraní

Un soldado estadounidense murió en el norte de Irak durante una 'detonación controlada' de municiones sin explotar de un avión no tripulado iraní derribado, elevando el número total de bajas estadounidenses desde el comienzo de la guerra entre Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán a 17. El incidente ocurrió como parte de las hostilidades en curso entre Estados Unidos e Irán, que se han intensificado desde febrero 28. Dos miembros adicionales del servicio estadounidense murieron en ataques iraníes en Jordania, mientras que un tercero desapareció. El conflicto se ha intensificado, con ambas partes lanzando ataques y ataques de represalia, incluidos ataques con aviones no tripulados contra activos estadounidenses en el Golfo. Irán ha desplegado cientos de aviones no tripulados Shahed de bajo costo, que han demostrado ser costosos y efectivos contra los interceptores estadounidenses.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta un relato fáctico de las acciones militares y las víctimas sin inclinación ideológica abierta. Si bien cubre un conflicto con carga política, no favorece a un lado sobre el otro en términos de enmarcado o énfasis.

Por qué veracidad (70): This article adds more context by mentioning the total number of US soldiers killed since the start of the US-Israel war on Iran, which is a significant piece of information. However, the claim that the 'war on Iran' began on February 28 is not clearly sourced, and the mention of 'unexploded ordnanc

Por qué objetividad (85): While the article presents facts objectively, it includes some contextual commentary on the broader conflict, which slightly affects neutrality. The mention of the 'struggle for control of the Strait of Hormuz' frames the situation in a geopolitical light, though it doesn’t overtly favor one side.

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishEstatal / públicoCentroVeracidad 65Objetividad 80hace 3 d
¿Por qué los EE.UU. atacan la infraestructura civil del sur de Irán?

Estados Unidos ha intensificado su campaña militar contra Irán, con funcionarios iraníes acusando a Washington de atacar infraestructura civil. En las últimas seis noches, las fuerzas estadounidenses han atacado estaciones de ferrocarril, vecindarios residenciales, puentes, instalaciones de agua, silos de alimentos y otras estructuras civiles en el sur de Irán. Estos ataques siguen a las declaraciones del ex presidente Donald Trump, quien sugirió que Estados Unidos eventualmente atacaría el sector energético de Irán. Las tensiones se han intensificado aún más cuando Irán afirma haber atacado aviones estadounidenses en Bahréin, mientras que Kuwait informa de responder a ataques de misiles y drones. El conflicto, que comenzó el 28 de febrero con ataques israelíes y estadounidenses contra Irán, ha visto a ambas partes acusarse mutuamente de violar un reciente acuerdo de alto el fuego. Los ataques han generado preocupaciones sobre el cumplimiento de la ley internacional y el riesgo de escalar en una guerra más amplia. El enfoque en la infraestructura civil de Estados Unidos ha provocado debates sobre los objetivos estratégicos potenciales, incluidos los preparativos para una invasión terrestre o el aumento de las presiones económicas y políticas.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta un relato equilibrado de la situación, citando acusaciones tanto de EE.UU. como de Irán sin favorecer abiertamente a una de las partes.

Por qué veracidad (65): The article focuses on the escalation of hostilities and quotes Iranian officials regarding alleged attacks on civilian infrastructure. However, these claims lack corroboration from other sources, making them less verifiable. The reference to Donald Trump's comments is included but not directly tied

Por qué objetividad (80): The article leans slightly toward highlighting Iranian perspectives and concerns about civilian infrastructure, which might introduce a subtle bias. While it attempts to remain balanced, the framing emphasizes Iranian accusations without providing equal counterpoints from the US perspective.

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas