¿Quién protegerá a los musulmanes?

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani recently reaffirmed his stance against any state that prioritizes one religion over another during an appearance on ABC, responding directly to the question of whether he would support Israel as a Jewish state. This position echoes past statements, particularly from a Democratic Party primary debate where Mamdani was the sole candidate to decline naming Israel as his “first foreign visit” if elected. His insistence on religious equality has drawn sharp criticism, with some opponents, including Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, accusing him of employing “blatant anti-Semitic language.” Danon’s remarks followed Mamdani’s critique of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which he described as entirely accurate. Such interventions by Israeli officials are not isolated incidents. Israeli Cabinet ministers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, routinely assert their “right to defend” themselves by criticizing global public figures, claiming they endanger the safety of Jews in their territories. These accusations are often used as leverage to silence critics, sometimes with considerable success. Governments, in turn, tend to accommodate these demands, even when the allegations appear unfounded or exaggerated. The broader implications of these dynamics raise pressing questions. What about the concerns of Muslims facing increasing hostility in regions where they live? Why do public figures who promote Islamophobic rhetoric go unchallenged, unlike those accused of anti-Semitic speech? For instance, a current U.S. congressmember has compared Muslims to animals, yet no prominent figure from the Muslim world has publicly condemned such remarks. Similarly, the wealthiest individual in the world has promoted a film depicting the murder of a Muslim immigrant's family, yet no equivalent condemnation has emerged from Muslim leaders or institutions. Muslims today face threats from powerful entities in both the West and the East. Their existence is increasingly viewed as a danger, and this perception endangers their lives. The legitimacy of the term “Islamophobia” is being challenged by individuals who regard Muslims as inferior, leading to a cycle where marginalized Muslims are blamed for rising anti-Semitism in the West. Muslims understand that the increase in anti-Semitism stems not from their presence in Western societies, but from their actions in Eastern contexts. The core issue remains: where can Muslims find protection? Those responsible for fostering Islamophobia in the West, regardless of their location, are unlikely to be held accountable. It is their own actions that create the conditions for discrimination. Thus, the search for solutions must look elsewhere. Civil society might offer avenues for redress, but political agendas and conflicting interests often hinder progress. Those who contribute to the marginalization of Muslims wield significant influence over the narrative, while Muslims themselves struggle to gain visibility. Some hope lies in institutions representing Muslim interests, such as the governments of Muslim-majority nations. These bodies possess the diplomatic stature and collective voice needed to counter the dominant anti-Muslim narrative. They can highlight injustices, safeguard the dignity of Muslim communities, and insist on accountability. However, the effectiveness of such efforts depends on the willingness of these institutions to act decisively and consistently. The path forward remains uncertain, but the need for action is clear.