ON
← Volver al feed
Estados Unidos rechaza la jurisdicción de la Corte Penal Internacional sobre sus propios ciudadanos.
BG🏛️ Políticaayer

Estados Unidos rechaza la jurisdicción de la Corte Penal Internacional sobre sus propios ciudadanos.

The article reports that the United States has rejected the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its citizens. The Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the President of the ICC, stating that the U.S. does not recognize the court’s authority over American nationals. It emphasizes that the U.S. is not a signatory to the Rome Statute and therefore cannot be bound by the ICC’s rulings. The letter criticizes the ICC for acting unlawfully and undermining U.S. sovereignty. The U.S. will no longer cooperate with any investigations, arrests, or transfers requested by the ICC, including extradition. The letter also highlights the importance of U.S. legal sovereignty and constitutional rights.

Ir a las fuentes primarias (2)

Las fuentes oficiales en las que se basa la cobertura. Léelas directamente para evitar el encuadre.

1 informaciones

24 Chasa logo24 ChasaIndependienteDerechaayer
Estados Unidos rechaza la jurisdicción de la Corte Penal Internacional sobre sus propios ciudadanos.

The article reports that the United States has rejected the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its citizens. The Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the President of the ICC, stating that the U.S. does not recognize the court’s authority over American nationals. It emphasizes that the U.S. is not a signatory to the Rome Statute and therefore cannot be bound by the ICC’s rulings. The letter criticizes the ICC for acting unlawfully and undermining U.S. sovereignty. The U.S. will no longer cooperate with any investigations, arrests, or transfers requested by the ICC, including extradition. The letter also highlights the importance of U.S. legal sovereignty and constitutional rights.

Lectura del sesgo (Derecha): The article frames the U.S. stance as a legitimate defense of national sovereignty against an allegedly illegitimate international tribunal. It uses strong language such as 'unlawful,' 'illegitimate,' and 'unconstitutional' to describe the ICC’s actions, which aligns with a right-leaning perspective

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas