Estancada en Polymarket, Francia también bloquea la plataforma de apuestas

On July 17, 2026, French authorities took decisive action against Polymarket, a U.S.-based predictive betting platform, by ordering internet service providers to completely block access to its website within France. The move comes after years of regulatory scrutiny and follows similar actions taken by Italy and over 30 other countries. The French National Gambling Authority (ANJ) cited serious concerns regarding the platform’s role in facilitating illegal gambling, user anonymity, and potential fraud, including allegations of insider trading. The ANJ's decision was based on findings from Paris prosecutors who investigated claims that a weather station at Charles de Gaulle International Airport had been deliberately tampered with. This alleged sabotage aimed to manipulate official temperature data, thereby enabling certain bettors to win specific wagers placed on Polymarket concerning Paris’s climate conditions. Such incidents highlight broader systemic risks associated with the platform, particularly its near-total user anonymity, which regulators argue facilitates insider trading, situations where individuals with confidential information place bets before public knowledge of an event. This case has reignited discussions around the dangers posed by unregulated predictive markets. The ANJ’s current measures represent a culmination of efforts dating back to early 2024, when initial restrictions were imposed to curb financial transactions related to the platform. However, these measures proved inadequate as users found ways to bypass them through digital workarounds. Now, with direct blocking enforced by internet providers, France joins a growing list of nations targeting Polymarket. The platform is already banned in Spain, Italy, several U.S. states, and numerous other jurisdictions worldwide. Regulators have also raised alarms over the scale of the operation. According to reports from reputable news agencies, Polymarket generates annual revenues exceeding one billion dollars. This rapid growth is attributed to the platform’s ability to allow speculation on global events, often without the identity verification processes required by stricter regulations. The lack of oversight raises ethical and legal questions, especially given the potential for misuse and manipulation of market outcomes. The situation has drawn attention to cases involving individual users who have allegedly exploited the system. For example, an Italian engineer working at Google was arrested for placing bets on Polymarket using strategies that reportedly allowed him to win substantial sums. Similar cases have emerged in the United States, where some individuals have allegedly used insider information to gain unfair advantages. These instances underscore the challenges faced by regulators in monitoring and controlling such platforms. Meanwhile, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) introduced new regulatory proposals in June aimed at curbing the influence of predictive betting platforms. These measures reflect a broader international effort to address the risks associated with unregulated financial activities. As more countries take steps to restrict access to Polymarket, the platform faces increasing pressure to comply with stringent regulatory standards or risk further expansion limitations. With the latest developments, the future of Polymarket remains uncertain. The company must navigate a complex landscape of national laws and international pressures while maintaining its core operations. The outcome will likely depend on how effectively it can adapt to evolving regulatory frameworks and whether it can find alternative methods to operate within legal boundaries. The ongoing regulatory battles signal a shift toward greater oversight in the realm of predictive betting.