The article discusses the case of Anđa Vučak, a university student who was injured during a confrontation in Novi Sad in January 2025. The incident led to the resignation of then Prime Minister Miloš Vučević, who initially claimed he had 'objective responsibility' for the event. However, Vučević later changed his narrative, stating that Anđa had physically fought back and fell, causing her injuries. This contradicts initial reports that described her being hit by a baseball bat, resulting in a broken jaw. Legal experts and advocates, including Srđan Hromiš, argue that this revision of facts constitutes a deliberate distortion of the truth. Medical evidence confirms that Anđa sustained serious physical injuries, and the legal proceedings against the perpetrators were halted due to this altered account. Additionally, Vučević used a video from a later protest to challenge claims of her injury, which has been criticized as misleading.
Lectura del sesgo (Derecha): The article frames the incident through the perspective of Miloš Vučević, a prominent right-wing politician, and presents his revised version of events as credible. It emphasizes his claim that Anđa 'physically fought back,' implying she was at fault, while downplaying the severity of her injuries.
Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 65 · Objetividad 45): The article presents a biased account of the incident, emphasizing the political implications and downplaying the victim's experience. It repeats the politician's claim that the girl 'fell' during a scuffle rather than being hit, which contradicts initial reports. The narrative lacks balance by not





