ON
← Volver al feed
El informe demócrata del Senado dice que los grandes bancos "miraron hacia otro lado" en Epstein
Qatar🏛️ PolíticaProgresistahace 8 h

El informe demócrata del Senado dice que los grandes bancos "miraron hacia otro lado" en Epstein

Un informe del senador estadounidense Ron Wyden, el principal demócrata en el Comité de Finanzas del Senado, alega que los principales bancos de Wall Street "miraron hacia otro lado" con respecto a las actividades del financiero en desgracia Jeffrey Epstein. El informe afirma que estos bancos ignoraron pruebas claras de tráfico sexual y lavado de dinero para mantener a Epstein como cliente, violando potencialmente las leyes federales contra el lavado de dinero. Wyden critica al Departamento de Justicia y Tesoro por la diligencia debida inadecuada en el caso Epstein, señalando que mientras Epstein murió bajo custodia en 2019, se presentaron pocos cargos contra otros involucrados. El informe nombra específicamente a JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank y Bank of America, acusándolos de facilitar las operaciones financieras de Epstein y sugiriendo violaciones de los estándares legales.

Senator Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, has released a detailed report alleging that major U.S. banks turned a blind eye to the financial activities of Jeffrey Epstein, the late disgraced financier accused of running a sex-trafficking ring. The report, issued on Tuesday, claims that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America facilitated Epstein's ability to move large sums of money, potentially enabling his criminal operations. According to Wyden, the banks' actions allowed Epstein to maintain access to substantial funds, which were reportedly used to attract, shelter, and transport his victims. The senator's office stated that bank records and public court documents reviewed by his team reveal a consistent pattern of behavior among the largest Wall Street banks, which chose to overlook clear signs of sex trafficking and money laundering to retain a high-profile client. The report suggests that these banks might have violated federal anti-money laundering laws, which require financial institutions to report suspicious transactions. Wyden criticized the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury for not conducting thorough investigations into Epstein's activities. Epstein was discovered dead in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Despite this, the number of criminal charges brought against individuals connected to Epstein has remained limited, primarily targeting Epstein himself and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. In contrast, several international law enforcement agencies have launched investigations into individuals suspected of having ties to Epstein, including the former British royal Prince Andrew. Wyden described the report as a critical resource for prosecutors, investigators, and lawmakers seeking to hold those associated with Epstein accountable. The document specifically names JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, suggesting that certain employees within these institutions should face scrutiny. It also identifies several individuals who allegedly helped Epstein transfer significant amounts of money globally. The report alleges that Bank of America likely breached federal anti-money laundering regulations by failing to report $170 million in payments made to Epstein by billionaire investor Leon Black. Additionally, it claims that JPMorgan Chase executives advised Epstein on methods to withdraw cash using shell companies rather than his personal accounts, thereby concealing information from compliance officers and government regulators. In response to the report, a representative from Bank of America emphasized the institution's commitment to legal and regulatory responsibilities, stating that the bank did not assist in any wrongdoing. A spokesperson for Deutsche Bank expressed regret over its past association with Epstein and noted cooperation with regulatory bodies and law enforcement agencies during their investigations. JPMorgan Chase, which had settled with Epstein survivors in 2023, did not provide immediate comments on the report. As midterm elections approach, Democrats have leveraged criticisms surrounding the Trump administration's management of Epstein-related investigative files as a point of contention. However, the issue has garnered uncommon bipartisan backing, reflecting broader concerns about transparency and accountability in handling such sensitive matters. Last November, both the Senate and House of Representatives initiated efforts aimed at scrutinizing the handling of these files, indicating a growing interest in ensuring that all relevant parties are held responsible for their roles in the Epstein case.

1 informaciones

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishEstatal / públicoProgresistaVeracidad 85Objetividad 70hace 8 h
El informe demócrata del Senado dice que los grandes bancos "miraron hacia otro lado" en Epstein

Un informe del senador estadounidense Ron Wyden, el principal demócrata en el Comité de Finanzas del Senado, alega que los principales bancos de Wall Street "miraron hacia otro lado" con respecto a las actividades del financiero en desgracia Jeffrey Epstein. El informe afirma que estos bancos ignoraron pruebas claras de tráfico sexual y lavado de dinero para mantener a Epstein como cliente, violando potencialmente las leyes federales contra el lavado de dinero. Wyden critica al Departamento de Justicia y Tesoro por la diligencia debida inadecuada en el caso Epstein, señalando que mientras Epstein murió bajo custodia en 2019, se presentaron pocos cargos contra otros involucrados. El informe nombra específicamente a JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank y Bank of America, acusándolos de facilitar las operaciones financieras de Epstein y sugiriendo violaciones de los estándares legales.

Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca el problema como un fracaso sistémico de las principales instituciones financieras y la supervisión gubernamental, enfatizando la complicidad corporativa y la negligencia institucional. El lenguaje sugiere una perspectiva de izquierda al destacar la responsabilidad corporativa y criticar los fracasos regulatorios, ya que

Por qué veracidad (85): The article reports on a Senate Democrat's findings regarding major banks' involvement with Epstein, citing specific claims made by Senator Ron Wyden. While there is no primary source document to verify these claims directly, the article aligns with broader reporting on the Epstein case, including a

Por qué objetividad (70): The article presents the senator's findings as credible but also criticizes the DOJ and Treasury for insufficient due diligence. This critique introduces a level of editorializing, particularly in suggesting that these agencies failed in their responsibilities. The tone leans toward questioning inst

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

El mismo suceso, agrupado por la inclinación política de los medios que lo cubren.

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Cobertura en el mundo

El mismo suceso según se informó en otros países.

Cobertura en el mundo

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Verificación de afirmaciones

Las principales afirmaciones fácticas y cuántas fuentes las respaldan o las rebaten.

Verificación de afirmaciones

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 4 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas