ON
← Volver al feed
- Los días de enfermedad
NO🏛️ Políticaayer

- Los días de enfermedad

The article discusses the ongoing impact of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now entering its fifth year. As of July 1, 2026, the war has lasted 1,590 days, with an estimated two million people injured or killed. On Thursday, Russia launched a major attack on Kyiv using 570 missiles and drones, resulting in 13 deaths and 86 injuries according to local authorities. Meanwhile, Russia is losing momentum on the battlefield, facing economic collapse, and experiencing increasing civilian casualties due to Ukrainian attacks deep within Russian territory. The article highlights growing domestic discontent in Russia, citing a study by the Ukrainian think tank Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR), which found that 80% of Russians support ending the war as soon as tomorrow—the highest level since the full-scale invasion began. Another study noted a significant drop in those who believe the war should continue indefinitely, down to 9%. Anonymous business leaders in Russia have expressed frustration with Putin’s handling of the conflict, calling it a 'disaster' and noting a loss of faith in his leadership.

La guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania ha entrado en su quinto año, marcando un triste hito ya que el conflicto continúa infligiendo profundas cicatrices en ambas naciones. Hasta el jueves, la guerra había alcanzado 1.590 días, con casi dos millones de personas gravemente heridas o muertas. La cifra es asombrosa, y el costo humano continúa aumentando a medida que los combates persisten sin señales de disminuir. En uno de los ataques más significativos hasta ahora, Rusia lanzó 570 misiles y drones contra Kiev durante la noche, lo que resultó en 13 muertes y 86 heridos según las autoridades locales.

Este asalto subraya la intensidad en curso del conflicto y la creciente desesperación de las fuerzas rusas, que han perdido impulso en el campo de batalla y se enfrentan a desafíos crecientes en sus estrategias militares y económicas.

Según el mayor general retirado Arne Bård Dalhaug, el primer año en que la guerra se financia genuinamente a través del aumento de impuestos y tarifas será 2026, ya que los recursos financieros del país comienzan a agotarse. Este cambio ha llevado a una insatisfacción generalizada entre los rusos, que ahora se encuentran soportando la carga de financiar una guerra que muchos creen que es invencible.

Dalhaug señala que esta tensión financiera ha creado una sensación de frustración y desilusión dentro de la población, particularmente a medida que la guerra se vuelve más costosa y menos efectiva.

A pesar de la narrativa oficial de resiliencia y determinación, hay un creciente descontento público con la forma en que se está gestionando la guerra. Un estudio reciente realizado por el Instituto ucraniano de estudios y análisis de conflictos de Rusia (ICAR) revela que ocho de cada diez rusos apoyan el fin de la guerra "lo antes posible", el nivel más alto registrado desde que comenzó la invasión a gran escala. Este sentimiento refleja un cambio en la opinión pública, con menos rusos dispuestos a soportar la guerra indefinidamente.

Según el periódico ruso independiente Meduza, el porcentaje de rusos que quieren que la guerra continúe sin una línea de tiempo fija hasta una victoria completa ha caído significativamente, del 13% al 9%, la cifra más baja desde que comenzó la invasión.

Esta creciente oposición no es meramente teórica, sino que también se refleja en el impacto tangible de la guerra en la vida cotidiana. La creciente frecuencia de los ataques ucranianos en territorio ruso ha acercado la realidad del conflicto a los ciudadanos comunes. El humo negro se eleva desde las refinerías de petróleo cerca de Moscú, como la instalación de Gazprom en las afueras de la capital, destacando el daño infligido por los ataques de aviones no tripulados ucranianos a infraestructuras críticas. Estos incidentes han hecho que la guerra sea más visible e inmediata para el ruso promedio, que ahora experimenta sus consecuencias directamente en lugar de abstractamente.

La frustración pública con el manejo de la guerra por parte del presidente Vladimir Putin también ha crecido. Un empresario ruso de alto rango anónimo le dijo al Financial Times el mes pasado que todos están enojados y que todos están de acuerdo en que la situación es una catástrofe. Otro líder empresarial anónimo, citado por The Guardian, describió una creciente conciencia de las decisiones irracionales y autodestructivas que se están tomando, señalando que incluso aquellos que alguna vez apoyaron a Putin lo han abandonado. A pesar de esto, el empresario ofreció un rayo de esperanza, afirmando que nadie cree que todo se derrumbará repentinamente mañana.

La guerra también ha recuperado su posición como la principal preocupación de los rusos, superando problemas como los bajos salarios y los altos precios. Una encuesta realizada en mayo de 2026 mostró que el 33% de los encuestados citó la guerra como su principal preocupación, en comparación con el 24% para los bajos salarios y el 18% para los altos precios. Esto indica que la guerra se ha convertido en el problema central que afecta la vida de los rusos, eclipsando otras preocupaciones apremiantes.

El propio Putin ha reconocido algunos de estos desafíos, admitiendo esta semana la escasez de combustible en el país después de los ataques de aviones no tripulados ucranianos contra la infraestructura petrolera rusa. En respuesta, estableció un equipo de crisis para abordar la escasez de combustible, señalando una rara admisión de vulnerabilidad. Sin embargo, a pesar de estas dificultades, Putin permanece relativamente seguro en su posición, con más de la mitad de los rusos todavía creyendo que está haciendo un buen trabajo. Esta paradoja, donde la guerra es profundamente impopular pero el presidente mantiene un apoyo significativo, plantea preguntas sobre la dinámica subyacente de la opinión pública y la lealtad política en Rusia.

Si bien la guerra continúa cobrando un alto precio a ambas partes, la situación sigue siendo fluida. La creciente insatisfacción entre la población rusa, combinada con los reveses estratégicos que enfrentan las fuerzas rusas, sugiere que el conflicto podría llegar a un punto de inflexión en los próximos meses. Si esto conduce a un acuerdo negociado o a una mayor escalada sigue siendo incierto, pero las señales de un cambio de marea son cada vez más evidentes.

Ir a las fuentes primarias (5)

Las fuentes oficiales en las que se basa la cobertura. Léelas directamente para evitar el encuadre.

7 informaciones

Dagbladet logoDagbladetIndependienteIzquierdaayer
Putin le da la espalda y dice que es una catástrofe

The article discusses the ongoing impact of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fifth year. It reports that over two million people have been seriously injured or killed in the conflict, with a major missile and drone attack on Kyiv resulting in 13 deaths and 86 injuries. The Russian military has lost momentum, facing economic strain and increasing Ukrainian attacks on strategic targets within Russia. Analysts note growing public discontent, citing a study showing 80% of Russians support ending the war immediately, the highest since the invasion began. Meanwhile, a separate study indicates declining support for continuing the war indefinitely, with only 9% of respondents favoring this approach. Anonymous business leaders express frustration over Putin’s handling of the war, calling it a 'disaster' and noting a loss of faith among former supporters.

Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): The article frames the growing public dissent against the war as a significant shift in Russian society, emphasizing the high percentage of citizens who want an immediate end to the conflict. While it presents data from independent sources like the Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of RUSS

Dagbladet logoDagbladetIndependienteCentroayer
Por primera vez en 88 años

This article discusses the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, marking the first time in 88 years that such a prolonged war has occurred. The war has lasted 1590 days, resulting in over two million casualties. On Thursday, Russia launched a major attack on Kyiv, killing 13 people and injuring 86. Meanwhile, Russia is losing momentum on the battlefield, facing economic collapse, and experiencing increasing resistance from Ukrainian attacks within Russian territory. Analysts note growing public dissatisfaction with the war, citing increased taxes and depleted reserves. A study by the Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR) reveals that 80% of Russians support ending the war as soon as tomorrow, the highest level since the invasion began. Another study indicates declining support for continuing the war indefinitely, with only 9% now supporting this stance. Anonymous business leaders express frustration with Putin’s handling of the war, calling it a disaster and noting a loss of faith in his leadership.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): While the article presents data showing significant public discontent with the war, it does not overtly frame the issue as politically biased. It cites multiple independent sources, including the Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR), Meduza, and anonymous business leaders, to

Dagbladet logoDagbladetIndependienteIzquierdaayer
- Los días de enfermedad

The article discusses the ongoing impact of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now entering its fifth year. As of July 1, 2026, the war has lasted 1,590 days, with an estimated two million people injured or killed. On Thursday, Russia launched a major attack on Kyiv using 570 missiles and drones, resulting in 13 deaths and 86 injuries according to local authorities. Meanwhile, Russia is losing momentum on the battlefield, facing economic collapse, and experiencing increasing civilian casualties due to Ukrainian attacks deep within Russian territory. The article highlights growing domestic discontent in Russia, citing a study by the Ukrainian think tank Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR), which found that 80% of Russians support ending the war as soon as tomorrow—the highest level since the full-scale invasion began. Another study noted a significant drop in those who believe the war should continue indefinitely, down to 9%. Anonymous business leaders in Russia have expressed frustration with Putin’s handling of the conflict, calling it a 'disaster' and noting a loss of faith in his leadership.

Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): The article frames the growing public dissent against the war in Russia as a sign of shifting societal attitudes, emphasizing the high percentage of Russians supporting an end to the conflict. It highlights the economic strain on Russia and the increasing civilian impact of the war, which aligns ide

Dagbladet logoDagbladetIndependienteIzquierdaayer
- No hay calor.

The article discusses the ongoing impact of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now entering its fifth year. It reports that over two million people have been seriously injured or killed in the conflict, with a major missile and drone attack on Kyiv resulting in 13 deaths and 86 injuries. The Russian military has lost momentum, facing increasing challenges from Ukrainian attacks on strategic targets within Russia. Analysts note growing public dissatisfaction with the war, citing rising taxes to fund the conflict and declining support for continued warfare. A study by an independent Russian newspaper reveals that 80% of Russians now support ending the war as soon as tomorrow, the highest level since the invasion began. Meanwhile, economic pressures and civilian casualties continue to fuel discontent among both civilians and elites.

Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): The article emphasizes growing public dissent against the war, highlights economic strain on Russian citizens, and cites independent research showing significant shifts in public opinion. While it presents data from multiple sources including an independent Russian newspaper, the framing leans on a

Dagbladet logoDagbladetIndependienteIzquierdaayer
- Cada día que pasa es peor.

The article discusses the ongoing impact of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now entering its fifth year. As of July 1, 2026, the war has lasted 1,590 days, with an estimated two million people injured or killed. On Thursday, Russia launched a major attack on Kyiv, killing 13 and injuring 86 according to local authorities. Meanwhile, Russia is losing momentum on the battlefield, facing economic collapse, and experiencing increasing civilian casualties due to Ukrainian attacks deep within Russian territory. The article highlights growing domestic discontent in Russia, citing a study by the Ukrainian think tank Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR), which found that 80% of Russians support ending the war as soon as tomorrow—the highest level since the full-scale invasion began. Another study noted a significant drop in those who believe the war should continue indefinitely, down to 9%. Anonymous business leaders in Russia have expressed frustration with Putin’s handling of the conflict, calling it a 'disaster' and noting a loss of faith in his leadership.

Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): The article frames the growing dissent against Russia's war efforts as a reflection of broader societal fatigue and disillusionment, emphasizing the shift in public opinion toward supporting an end to the conflict. It highlights the role of independent research institutions like ICAR and references

Dagbladet logoDagbladetIndependienteCentroayer
- Me voy a despedir.

The article discusses the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, now in its fifth year, with over two million people affected by casualties or injuries. On Thursday, Russia launched a major attack on Kyiv, killing 13 and injuring 86 according to local authorities. The Russian military has lost momentum, facing economic strain and increasing Ukrainian attacks on strategic targets within Russia. Analyst Arne Bård Dalhaug notes growing public dissatisfaction due to reliance on increased taxes to fund the war. A study by the Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR) reveals that 80% of Russians support ending the war as soon as tomorrow, the highest level since the invasion began. Meanwhile, independent reports indicate declining support for continuing the war indefinitely, with only 9% of respondents favoring this option. Anonymous business leaders express frustration over Putin’s handling of the war, calling it a 'disaster' and noting a loss of faith among former supporters.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): While the article presents data showing significant public discontent with the war, it does not overtly frame the issue as politically biased. It includes both Russian state-controlled narratives and independent studies, providing balanced context. The emphasis is on factual reporting rather than a傾

NRK Nyheter logoNRK NyheterEstatal / públicoCentrohace 5 d
Putin se encuentra a salvo

Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to remain secure despite ongoing challenges, including recent attacks on a weapons factory in Voronezh, daily drone strikes, fuel shortages on Crimea, and fires at Moscow's largest oil refinery. These incidents have led to disruptions such as rationing of gasoline and restrictions on mobile internet in Moscow. Despite these issues, more than half of Russians still believe Putin is performing well. However, public sentiment is mixed, with many weary of the war but continuing to support the military effort. The population is increasingly concerned about high interest rates and rising prices rather than the conflict itself. There is little enthusiasm for Russia’s 'special operation' in Ukraine, though many express indifference. Meanwhile, there is hope among some that Russian elites might turn against Putin, recalling historical precedents where elite shifts had significant consequences.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article presents a balanced view of the situation in Russia, highlighting both the challenges faced by the country and the continued support for Putin among a majority of citizens. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either supporting or criticizing Putin, instead providing context on public态度

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas