La PM: "Es normal que un hombre tenga que vencer un poco de resistencia por el sexo".
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Cómo lo cubrió cada lado
El mismo suceso, agrupado por la inclinación política de los medios que lo cubren.
izquierda
centro
derecha
★
Cómo lo cubrió cada lado
Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y tu feed Para ti personalizado.
In 2021, a prosecutor in Benevento requested the dismissal of a domestic violence case against a man, citing the idea that men might need to overcome a woman’s resistance during sexual encounters, which was later revealed by Il Fatto Quotidiano. This statement led to a European Court of Human Rights (Cedu) ruling that condemned Italy for failing to properly handle the case, violating the rights to privacy and protection from inhumane treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights. The victim, Audrey Ubeda, along with her two children, has been awarded €15,000 each in compensation. The court criticized the prosecutor's sexist and stereotypical remarks, noting they contributed to the normalization of domestic violence and secondary victimization of survivors. The judges emphasized that Italian authorities failed to recognize the complex mechanisms of domestic abuse and did not make serious efforts to understand the complainants' situation.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article presents the court's findings and criticisms objectively, quoting the Cedu's statements and the concerns raised by the Council of Europe's expert group. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing but rather reports on the legal and social implications of the case.
Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 85 · Objetividad 70): The article accurately reports the European Court of Human Rights ruling against Italy over the sexist remarks by a prosecutor. It provides details about the case, including the victim’s background and the financial penalties. However, the tone leans slightly towards criticizing Italian judicial pra
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Italy over its handling of a domestic violence case involving a French woman and her two children. The court ruled that the judicial process was too slow, inadequate, and ineffective, failing to meet the standards set by the Convention. The public prosecutor, referred to as 'la pm,' had requested the closure of the case with sexist and stereotypical reasoning, suggesting that men naturally encounter resistance during sexual encounters. The court criticized these remarks as reflecting a sexist and stereotypical mindset, which could further victimize women in court. Following objections from the woman, the request was rejected, leading to additional investigations. The Italian authorities were found to have failed to adequately address the severity of the allegations. As a result, the state must pay €15,000 in moral damages to the woman and her children, plus €15,000 for legal expenses. The woman, Audrey Ubeda, described the ruling as a turning point and a victory for all women.
Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within the Italian justice system, highlighting sexist attitudes among prosecutors and the broader implications for victims of domestic violence. While the subject involves legal procedures, the emphasis on gender-based discrimination and the call-f
El sistema de justicia italiano ha sido condenado por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos por no proteger adecuadamente a una mujer acusada de sufrir violencia doméstica y a sus dos hijos. El tribunal criticó tanto el manejo del caso como las observaciones específicas hechas por los fiscales durante la investigación. El caso involucra a Audrey Carmen Manuela Ubeda, una ciudadana francesa que vive en Italia, que informó de repetidos abusos físicos y psicológicos por parte de su ex pareja, el padre de sus dos hijos. Después de su informe en abril de 2021, ella y sus hijos fueron colocados en un refugio protegido durante más de tres años hasta julio de 2024. El tribunal destacó que los comentarios del fiscal, que se refirieron a la resistencia de la presunta víctima como "normal", reflejaban estereotipos sexistas y contribuyeron a la victimización secundaria. El fallo también señaló que las autoridades actuaron rápidamente, pero la investigación general no cumplió con los estándares internacionales para abordar la violencia doméstica.
Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): El artículo enmarca la crítica al sistema judicial italiano como una cuestión más amplia de discriminación por razón de género y de incapacidad institucional para proteger a las mujeres.
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Italy
