ON
← Volver al feed
Ministarstvo pravosuđa SAD-a odbija objaviti sve Epsteinove spise
Croatia🏛️ Políticaayer

Ministarstvo pravosuđa SAD-a odbija objaviti sve Epsteinove spise

The U.S. Department of Justice has refused to release additional documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, despite a court order, citing that some materials contain sensitive information about victims or were redacted under law. Assistant Attorney General Stanley Woodward requested a delay or cancellation of the deadline, arguing that the department needs time to clarify ambiguities in the files. He noted that certain emails, with hidden senders and recipients, were redacted to protect victims' identities, and that some communications from victims could appear disturbing out of context. The department also claimed that redactions in an 2007 Florida lawsuit were already present in the original file they obtained. The case also involves notes from an interview with a woman who alleged inappropriate conduct by former President Donald Trump, which the DOJ deemed unnecessary compared to typed reports. These handwritten notes were not released, raising concerns over potential exposure of personal data. The DOJ disputes claims that it violated a congressional law meant to force disclosure, asserting it remains committed to compliance. A federal judge previously ruled against the DOJ,指出

Ir a las fuentes primarias (1)

Las fuentes oficiales en las que se basa la cobertura. Léelas directamente para evitar el encuadre.

1 informaciones

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependienteCentroayer
Ministarstvo pravosuđa SAD-a odbija objaviti sve Epsteinove spise

The U.S. Department of Justice has refused to release additional documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, despite a court order, citing that some materials contain sensitive information about victims or were redacted under law. Assistant Attorney General Stanley Woodward requested a delay or cancellation of the deadline, arguing that the department needs time to clarify ambiguities in the files. He noted that certain emails, with hidden senders and recipients, were redacted to protect victims' identities, and that some communications from victims could appear disturbing out of context. The department also claimed that redactions in an 2007 Florida lawsuit were already present in the original file they obtained. The case also involves notes from an interview with a woman who alleged inappropriate conduct by former President Donald Trump, which the DOJ deemed unnecessary compared to typed reports. These handwritten notes were not released, raising concerns over potential exposure of personal data. The DOJ disputes claims that it violated a congressional law meant to force disclosure, asserting it remains committed to compliance. A federal judge previously ruled against the DOJ,指出

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article presents both sides of the legal dispute between the DOJ and the court regarding document disclosure. It includes statements from the DOJ defending their actions and quotes from the judge ruling against them. While there is some emphasis on the DOJ’s position, the overall tone remains客观,

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas