La marcha de la amnesia

Colombian opposition groups staged mass protests against President Abelardo De La Espriella's government shortly after its formation, raising concerns over the new decree regulating police actions during demonstrations. The demonstrations took place amid growing tensions over policy changes and governance issues. The protests were organized by various factions, including labor unions and political opponents, who expressed dissatisfaction with the administration’s early policies. The protests began in late October 2026, following the issuance of a new decree that outlines how law enforcement should respond during public demonstrations. This decree allows for immediate action against individuals committing acts of violence without waiting for dialogue to conclude. Critics argue this could lead to excessive use of force by police during peaceful protests. The United Nations Office in Colombia raised concerns about the potential impact of the new decree. In a statement released in mid-October, the UN questioned several aspects of the regulation, particularly the conditions under which police can end negotiations with protesters. The document highlighted that some provisions allow for broad interpretations, potentially leading to premature termination of dialogues and subsequent use of force. The UN emphasized the importance of distinguishing between violent acts and peaceful demonstrations. It pointed out that carrying an object that could be considered a weapon does not automatically make someone violent or change the nature of a peaceful gathering. Additionally, the organization warned against using economic disruptions or road blockages as justification for coercive interventions. The new decree has sparked debates among legal experts and civil rights advocates regarding its alignment with international standards. Some provisions have been criticized for expanding the definition of violent acts beyond what is typically recognized internationally. The UN urged authorities to ensure that the use of force remains a last resort and only after exhausting non-violent containment methods. Protesters argued that their demands are legitimate and rooted in long-standing issues within the education system and labor laws. However, critics suggested that some of the grievances might be exaggerated or misinterpreted, especially given the recent implementation of policies aimed at addressing these very challenges. The situation highlights ongoing discussions about balancing public safety with the right to peaceful assembly. As the government continues to implement its agenda, the response from both supporters and opponents will likely shape the trajectory of these debates.