El Congreso llama a Infantino a defenderse, en noviembre podría estar en problemas.

Gianni Infantino, president of FIFA, faces mounting political pressure in the United States after being called to testify before Congress. Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, has demanded that Infantino appear before the committee to explain FIFA's relationship with former President Donald Trump and his administration. Raskin requested all documents and communications between FIFA and Trump, members of his administration, and the Trump Organization dating back to 2024. This includes a list of all gifts, awards, public appearances, or other benefits FIFA may have given to Trump or his staff, as well as access to records of visits to FIFA offices in New York and Miami. Raskin accused FIFA of having gone too far in its approach to Trump in recent months. Among the allegations are the awarding of a newly established peace prize to Trump, the opening of offices in the Trump Tower complex, and the relocation of the World Cup draw from Las Vegas to the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., which is managed by Trump’s administration. Additional controversy arose during the World Cup when FIFA lifted a ban on U.S. player Folarin Balogun following a phone call between Trump and Infantino. Trump later publicly claimed credit for the decision, though FIFA insists the move was made independently. Many politicians and sports officials have disputed this claim. In his letter, Raskin highlighted the recent decision by the U.S. Department of Justice to abandon certain proceedings in a long-running investigation into corruption in world football. He argued that the close ties between FIFA and Trump’s administration should be examined to determine if they influenced these decisions. The sale of World Cup tickets has also come under scrutiny, with Raskin citing investigations by state attorneys general into alleged deceptive pricing practices, high markups, and seat changes after ticket purchases. He requested all communication between FIFA and U.S. authorities regarding the sale of tickets. The White House dismissed the allegations. Press secretary Davis Ingle emphasized that Trump successfully hosted the World Cup, which he claimed generated billions in economic impact and became one of the most successful sporting events in history. Although Democrats currently lack a majority in the House and thus cannot compel Infantino to testify, this could change after the November congressional elections. If that happens, Raskin could gain the authority to issue subpoenas. Infantino has faced increasing scrutiny over FIFA's dealings with Trump and his administration. The calls for him to testify reflect broader concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of political figures on international sports organizations. The situation highlights the growing intersection between sports governance and national politics, particularly in the context of major global events like the World Cup. The timeline of events began with Raskin's formal request for Infantino to appear before Congress. This followed a series of actions by FIFA that were perceived as overly favorable toward Trump, including the relocation of the World Cup draw and the lifting of the ban on Balogun. These actions sparked criticism from various quarters, leading to increased pressure on FIFA to provide transparency. The White House's response, while dismissive of the allegations, did not quell the demands from Congress. The individuals and organizations involved include Gianni Infantino, the head of FIFA; Jamie Raskin, the Democratic congressman leading the inquiry; the Trump administration; the Trump Organization; and various U.S. state attorneys general investigating ticket sales. The locations mentioned are New York, Miami, Las Vegas, and Washington, D.C., each playing a role in the unfolding narrative. Background information reveals that FIFA has been under scrutiny for years due to allegations of corruption and unethical practices. The current situation with Trump adds another layer of complexity, as it involves potential political influence on a major international sports body. The differing perspectives between Raskin and the White House highlight the contentious nature of the issue, with Raskin emphasizing the need for accountability and the White House defending Trump's legacy. Reactions from those involved have varied. While Raskin and others demand transparency and accountability, the White House maintains that Trump's hosting of the World Cup was a success. FIFA has consistently denied any undue influence from Trump's administration, insisting that its decisions were made independently. However, the ongoing investigations and congressional inquiries suggest that the situation remains unresolved. As the November elections approach, the potential shift in power dynamics within Congress could significantly affect the outcome of this situation. If Democrats gain control, Raskin would have greater leverage to obtain the information he seeks. Until then, the focus remains on whether FIFA will comply with the requests for testimony and documentation.