ON
← Volver al feed
Dentro de la salida de Ariana Grande del espectáculo de Londres, cómo los jefes de teatro se quedaron en un "terrible lío" - y por qué la ira está comenzando a aumentar hacia la gente alrededor de la frágil estrella
United Kingdom🏛️ PolíticaCentroayer

Dentro de la salida de Ariana Grande del espectáculo de Londres, cómo los jefes de teatro se quedaron en un "terrible lío" - y por qué la ira está comenzando a aumentar hacia la gente alrededor de la frágil estrella

Ariana Grande actuó en Montreal el viernes por la noche, mostrando su talento vocal a pesar de parecer físicamente enferma. Su nuevo video musical para 'Petal', que presenta imágenes gráficas de su ataque a ejecutivos masculinos con una motosierra, provocó una preocupación generalizada por su salud e imagen corporal.

Ariana Grande made headlines worldwide on Saturday after abruptly withdrawing from a highly anticipated London stage production of Sunday in the Park with George just hours before her team officially announced her decision. The move came amid growing controversy over her recent music video for the single Petal, which featured her in a violent confrontation with music executives, sparking intense debate over body image and mental health. Grande, 33, was set to star alongside Jonathan Bailey in the production at London’s Barbican Arts Centre. The pairing was hailed as a major coup for the venue, given the duo’s success in the Wicked film franchise, which grossed over $750 million globally and earned numerous awards. The production was expected to draw large crowds and generate significant buzz in the theater community. However, just under an hour before the announcement, the production team was informed that Grande had withdrawn from the project, leaving them scrambling to manage the fallout. The official statement from Grande’s team came shortly after, stating that she would “take a step back from visibility” following the completion of her Eternal Sunshine Tour. They cited “endless, ongoing scrutiny” about her appearance as the reason behind her decision. The timing of the announcement, just days after the release of the Petal music video, raised questions about whether the controversy surrounding the video influenced her choice. The Petal video, which features Grande wielding a chainsaw against a group of dismissive music executives, sparked widespread discussion. While some praised its boldness and artistic merit, others focused heavily on her physical appearance, with many critics highlighting her slim frame. On social media platforms, particularly Instagram, where Grande has nearly 363 million followers, users began posting comments expressing concern about the potential impact of the video on young fans. Several users attached “community notes” to her posts, warning about eating disorders and encouraging those struggling with them to seek help. British actress and activist Jameela Jamil, who has publicly spoken about her experience with an eating disorder, posted a comment suggesting that Grande might be “dying in front of us.” She criticized the decision to release the video, calling it “deeply irresponsible.” Although she later deleted the post, she reaffirmed her stance, emphasizing the potential harm the video could cause to impressionable viewers. Fans and critics alike have expressed mixed reactions to Grande’s withdrawal from the London production. Some have voiced frustration, arguing that the decision appears to be driven more by external pressures than personal choice. Others have supported her, acknowledging the immense pressure she faces as a global superstar. Social media discussions have turned increasingly critical, with some accusing her team of enabling harmful narratives around her image. The sudden nature of Grande’s withdrawal has left theater professionals and industry insiders bewildered. The Barbican, known for hosting high-profile productions, was caught off guard by the last-minute cancellation. According to reports, the production team was preparing for a major marketing push when the news broke. The incident has also fueled speculation about the influence of public perception on the careers of celebrities, especially those in the entertainment industry. As the situation continues to unfold, the focus remains on the implications of Grande’s decision, not just for her personal well-being, but for the broader conversation around celebrity culture, mental health, and the responsibilities of public figures. What comes next will likely depend on how the public and industry stakeholders respond to the unfolding narrative. For now, the spotlight remains firmly on Ariana Grande and the forces shaping her public persona.

1 informaciones

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependienteCentroVeracidad 75Objetividad 55ayer
Dentro de la salida de Ariana Grande del espectáculo de Londres, cómo los jefes de teatro se quedaron en un "terrible lío" - y por qué la ira está comenzando a aumentar hacia la gente alrededor de la frágil estrella

Ariana Grande actuó en Montreal el viernes por la noche, mostrando su talento vocal a pesar de parecer físicamente enferma. Su nuevo video musical para 'Petal', que presenta imágenes gráficas de su ataque a ejecutivos masculinos con una motosierra, provocó una preocupación generalizada por su salud e imagen corporal.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo se centra en las decisiones personales de salud y carrera de Ariana Grande, sin contenido político directo ni comentarios sobre políticas gubernamentales, funcionarios o políticas públicas.

Por qué veracidad (75): The article provides details about Ariana Grande's performance in Montreal and her decision to step back from public life, citing her team's announcement. It references the release of her music video 'Petal' and fan reactions. While these facts align with general knowledge about Grande's career, the

Por qué objetividad (55): The article presents a narrative that emphasizes the controversy surrounding Ariana Grande's appearance in the music video and the public backlash. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'drenched in blood, like a horror film' and highlights fan reactions with quotes that seem to support a par

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

El mismo suceso, agrupado por la inclinación política de los medios que lo cubren.

Cómo lo cubrió cada lado

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Cobertura en el mundo

El mismo suceso según se informó en otros países.

Cobertura en el mundo

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Verificación de afirmaciones

Las principales afirmaciones fácticas y cuántas fuentes las respaldan o las rebaten.

Verificación de afirmaciones

Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.

Hazte suscriptor

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 4 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas