The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has confirmed that Femi Gbajabiamila, the Chief of Staff to President Bola Tinubu, was not arrested in connection with the ongoing investigation into the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC) scandal. Instead, Gbajabiamila voluntarily attended an interview with investigators and left after answering their questions, according to a statement released by the commission on Tuesday. Gbajabiamila arrived at the ICPC headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday afternoon, met with investigators, and departed shortly thereafter. The commission emphasized that his presence was based on an invitation from its investigators and aligned with its broader effort to collect information related to the PFIPC controversy. There was no mention of any formal detention or legal action against Gbajabiamila during the encounter. This clarification comes after reports circulated suggesting that Gbajabiamila had been arrested. His lawyer, Jiti Ogunye, had previously informed the media that Gbajabiamila appeared before the ICPC on Monday to respond to questions about the alleged scandal. According to Ogunye, Gbajabiamila cooperated fully with the commission's inquiries and returned to his duties afterward. The investigation into the PFIPC follows a directive from President Tinubu, who ordered the ICPC to conduct a thorough examination of the matter in early July. The president mandated that the commission complete its inquiry and present a detailed report within 30 days. The PFIPC, which is not recognized by any law or presidential decree, has been the subject of intense scrutiny due to claims that it operated within the federal bureaucracy despite lacking legal legitimacy. The controversy surrounding the PFIPC intensified after Adeniyi Adeyemi, an individual who allegedly posed as the organization's director-general, claimed to have paid N400 million in bribes to secure its operations. Among these payments, Adeyemi reportedly included funds he believed were given to Gbajabiamila. However, Gbajabiamila has denied receiving any such bribe and has stated that he was the one who reported Adeyemi to the police. Adeyemi faces multiple charges, including conspiracy and forgery, in relation to the PFIPC. A warrant for his arrest has been issued following repeated absences from court proceedings. He is currently in police custody. Meanwhile, Gbajabiamila has initiated legal action against Adeyemi, filing a N15 billion defamation lawsuit after demanding that the latter retract the bribery allegations and issue an apology. The PFIPC scandal has raised concerns about the functioning of the federal bureaucracy, particularly how the organization managed to secure office space, obtain budget allocations, open bank accounts, and employ public officials without a legal foundation. These issues are central to the ICPC's current investigation. Separately, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has called on President Tinubu to apologize to Nigerians and resign over what he describes as a cover-up related to the PFIPC accounts scandal. This call follows conflicting statements from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation (OAGF). Atiku argues that the discrepancies between these two institutions' accounts have placed the Tinubu administration in a severe credibility crisis. In a statement released by his senior special assistant on public communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku asserted that the president must take immediate responsibility for the situation. He urged Tinubu to initiate an independent investigation and hold all parties accountable to restore public trust. If the president fails to act decisively, Atiku suggested that Tinubu has forfeited the moral authority to remain in office. Atiku criticized the administration for its lack of transparency and warned that the continued silence of key officials, including the attorney-general, exacerbates the crisis. He called on the National Assembly to compel both the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Governor of the Central Bank to testify before an investigative committee under oath, ensuring that the public receives a clear and unified explanation of the events. The PFIPC scandal has evolved beyond mere financial disputes, according to Atiku, becoming a test of President Tinubu's integrity and leadership capabilities. He argued that if a single individual could manipulate the system to create contradictions between two crucial financial institutions, it raises serious questions about the extent of potential mismanagement and oversight failures within the administration.
3 informaciones
Premium Times NigeriaIndependienteCentroVeracidad 90Objetividad 85hace 6 dLa Comisión Independiente de Prácticas Corruptas y Otros Delitos Relacionados (ICPC) en Nigeria confirmó que interrogó a Femi Gbajabiamila, el Jefe de Gabinete del Presidente Bola Tinubu, con respecto a una investigación sobre las actividades de un supuesto Consejo Presidencial de Promoción de Inversiones Extranjeras (PFIPC). El PFIPC no fue establecido oficialmente por ley o decreto presidencial, pero según se informa operó dentro de la Secretaría Federal en Abuja durante más de dos años. Gbajabiamila asistió a la investigación voluntariamente y cooperó con los investigadores, aunque no fue arrestado. El ICPC enfatizó que el interrogatorio era parte de sus esfuerzos en curso para recopilar información sobre las supuestas operaciones ilegales del PFIPC. La controversia surgió después de que Adyieniy Adeemi, quien afirmaba ser el director general del PFIPC, alegó que pagó 400 millones de dólares en sobornos para facilitar el funcionamiento de la organización, incluidos los supuestos pagos que Adejabi Gbajabiamila hizo a la policía y negó haber recibido reclamos de soborno.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta un relato equilibrado de la situación, citando tanto la confirmación del ICPC de interrogar a Gbajabiamila como las declaraciones del abogado de Gbajabiamila, e incluye detalles desde múltiples perspectivas sin aparente sesgo hacia ninguno de los lados de la investigación.
Por qué veracidad (90): This article accurately reports the ICPC's confirmation that Gbajabiamila was questioned but not arrested. It includes direct quotes from the ICPC spokesperson and aligns closely with the first article's information. The details about the questioning process and the lack of arrest are consistent wit
Por qué objetividad (85): The article remains largely objective, presenting the facts without overt bias. It avoids taking sides and focuses on the actions of the ICPC and Gbajabiamila. However, it could have included more context from other parties involved in the scandal for greater balance.
Vanguard NigeriaIndependienteCentroVeracidad 90Objetividad 80hace 6 dLa Comisión Independiente de Prácticas Corruptas (ICPC) en Nigeria ha aclarado que Femi Gbajabiamila, el Jefe de Gabinete del Presidente Bola Tinubu, no fue arrestado, pero cooperó voluntariamente con los investigadores con respecto al escándalo PFIPC. En una declaración, el portavoz de la ICPC, Demola Bakare, confirmó que Gbajabiamila visitó la oficina de la comisión en Abuja, respondió preguntas y se fue voluntariamente. La investigación, ordenada por el presidente Tinubu en julio, está en curso, y la comisión se comprometió a proporcionar más actualizaciones. El abogado de Gbajabijamila declaró anteriormente que el ayudante compareció ante la ICPC para abordar las acusaciones relacionadas con el escándalo.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta información factual del ICPC sobre la cooperación de Gbajabiamila con los investigadores, sin favorecer abiertamente a ningún lado político, incluye citas de fuentes oficiales y proporciona contexto sobre la investigación en curso sin tomar una postura ideológica clara.
Por qué veracidad (90): The article provides a clear and factual account of the ICPC confirming that Gbajabiamila was questioned but not arrested. It includes direct quotes from the ICPC spokesperson and aligns with the second article's information. The timeline and procedural details are consistent with the available cros
Por qué objetividad (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, reporting events objectively without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and sticks to verified facts, though it does not include perspectives from other stakeholders like Atiku Abubakar or the Tinubu administration.
Vanguard NigeriaIndependienteProgresistaVeracidad 75Objetividad 45hace 5 d Escándalo PFIPC: Disculpe y renuncie ahora, Atiku se enfrenta a TinubuEl ex vicepresidente Atiku Abubakar ha instado al presidente Bola Tinubu a disculparse con los nigerianos y a renunciar por el escándalo de las cuentas de PFIPC, citando testimonios contradictorios entre el Banco Central de Nigeria (CBN) y la Oficina del Contador General de la Federación (OAGF). Atiku acusó a la administración de Tinubu de encubrimiento y una crisis de credibilidad, argumentando que el presidente debe una disculpa a los nigerianos y debe iniciar una investigación independiente. Criticó la falta de claridad de ambas instituciones financieras y condenó al fiscal general por permanecer en silencio. Atiku pidió a la Asamblea Nacional que convocara a ambos funcionarios para un testimonio jurado para resolver la disputa.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca el escándalo de la PFIPC como una crisis de credibilidad e integridad dentro de la administración del presidente Tinubu, usando un lenguaje fuerte como "encubrimiento", "crisis de credibilidad" y "autoridad moral".
Por qué veracidad (75): The article accurately reports Atiku Abubakar's demands regarding the PFIPC scandal and references the conflicting testimonies between CBN and OAGF. However, it lacks specific details about the nature of these contradictions and does not cite direct evidence or official statements beyond Atiku's cla
Por qué objetividad (45): The article uses strong, emotionally charged language such as 'gravest credibility crisis' and 'web of deception,' which suggest bias toward Atiku's position. It frames the situation as a clear-cut case of corruption and dishonesty without presenting alternative viewpoints or providing nuance.
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Hazte suscriptor
NG
![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos (La verdad es que no es así)](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FTULFO_ULET.mp4.00_03_26_16.Still001.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)