Akbayan Party-list Representative Perci Cendaña asserted Monday that Vice President Sara Duterte will face a certain conviction based solely on the evidence presented during her impeachment hearings. Speaking in Manila, Cendaña emphasized that if the proceedings rely exclusively on documented proof, Duterte's conviction is inevitable. This claim comes amid ongoing legal battles surrounding the vice president’s financial disclosures and allegations of unexplained wealth. During the House of Representatives’ Committee on Justice impeachment hearings, Cendaña highlighted discrepancies in Duterte’s Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth. These inconsistencies prompted calls for the release of her bank and tax records, which are currently under scrutiny by the Senate impeachment court. The court is set to rule on a subpoena request filed by the prosecution team seeking access to these documents. The documents are intended to be compared with Duterte’s SALN filings to assess whether there is a discrepancy in her declared assets and income. Supporters of the impeachment effort, including groups such as Akbayan Party-list, Magdalo, Mamamayang Liberal, EveryWoman, Tindig Pilipinas, and others, have gathered outside the Senate building to demand the immediate disclosure of Duterte’s financial information. They argue that transparency is essential to holding public officials accountable. Akbayan President Rafaela David stated that the public is watching closely not just Duterte, but also the senator-judges overseeing the impeachment trial, as they are scrutinized for impartiality. The prosecution team, led by the House of Representatives' impeachment committee, has sought to obtain the financial records of Duterte and her husband, lawyer Manases Carpio, as well as those of businesses allegedly linked to the couple. The subpoena request is tied to Article II of the Impeachment Articles, which addresses allegations of unexplained wealth. Senator-judges are scheduled to have up to 10 minutes each to ask clarifying questions to both the prosecution and defense teams. Each side is allowed a maximum of one hour to present its arguments before the court votes on whether to approve the subpoena. Former Congressman Oscar Moreno, who previously served as a prosecutor during the impeachment trial of former President Joseph Estrada, expressed support for the subpoena request. He noted that bank records can provide a clear trail of financial activity, helping to trace the flow of funds associated with Duterte. Moreno emphasized that while bank confidentiality laws exist, they are not absolute and should not be used to shield corrupt practices. He pointed out that the Philippines’ strict bank secrecy rules have contributed to its placement on the Financial Action Task Force’s gray list, highlighting concerns about financial transparency. Moreno also mentioned that reports from the Anti-Money Laundering Council could play a critical role in identifying suspicious transactions. These reports, though not conclusive proof of wrongdoing, could guide prosecutors toward specific accounts, checks, depositors, and counterparties that warrant further investigation. He stressed that transparency and accountability are essential in combating graft and corruption, arguing that public officials must not be allowed to hide behind confidentiality to avoid scrutiny. Non-government organizations, such as Pinoy Aksyon, have praised the Senate’s decision to issue the subpoena, calling it a step forward in promoting transparency. Chairperson BenCyrus Ellorin described the requested documents as vital to uncovering the truth regarding Duterte’s alleged unexplained wealth. The documents are expected to be submitted to the impeachment court by 9 a.m. on July 30, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal proceedings.
4 informaciones
RapplerIndependienteProgresistaVeracidad 90Objetividad 85ayerEl ex congresista Oscar Moreno, quien anteriormente trabajó en el juicio político contra el ex presidente Joseph Estrada, testificó que los registros financieros podrían ayudar a rastrear la presunta riqueza inexplicable de la vicepresidenta Sara Duterte. El tribunal de juicio político del Senado autorizó recientemente citaciones para Duterte y su esposo, el abogado Manases 'Mans' Carpio, para obtener sus documentos bancarios e impositivos. Estos registros se compararían con los activos e ingresos declarados de Duterte. La defensa de Duterte afirma que las citaciones son ilegales y opresivas, mientras que Moreno argumenta que dichos registros son esenciales para rastrear los movimientos de activos y posibles fondos ilícitos.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca la cuestión en torno a la necesidad de transparencia y responsabilidad en los cargos públicos, alineándose con los valores progresistas. Destaca las preocupaciones sobre la riqueza inexplicable y la corrupción, utilizando argumentos legales para apoyar la posición de la fiscalía.
Por qué veracidad (90): The article accurately reports on the legal arguments between the prosecution and defense regarding the subpoena of Duterte's financial records. It cites former congressman Oscar Moreno's comments and aligns with the primary source document's timeline and events. The information is presented factual
Por qué objetividad (85): While the article provides a clear summary of the legal debate, it gives more weight to the prosecution's perspective by quoting Moreno, who supports the subpoena. However, it does include some counterarguments from the defense, maintaining a reasonable level of balance.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependienteCentroVeracidad 88Objetividad 82hace 6 dEl senador Francis 'Chiz' Escudero, que preside la corte de juicio político, elogió los argumentos orales "calmos" entre el abogado defensor de la vicepresidenta Sara Duterte, Michael Poa, y el fiscal de la Cámara de Representantes, Chel Diokno. El debate se centró en si la corte de juicio político podría citar a los registros bancarios y fiscales de Duterte. Poa argumentó que leyes como la Ley contra el blanqueo de dinero y el Código Nacional de Ingresos Internos protegen la privacidad financiera, mientras que Diokno sostuvo que estas leyes no impiden explícitamente que la corte acceda a dichos registros. Escudero elogió a ambas partes por mantener una discusión respetuosa y caballerosa sobre un tema controvertido.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta un relato equilibrado del debate jurídico entre los equipos de defensa y de acusación, haciendo hincapié en el carácter respetuoso del intercambio.
Por qué veracidad (88): The article accurately reports on Akbayan Representative Perci Cendaña's assertion that Duterte will be convicted based on evidence alone. It includes relevant context about previous hearings and public pressure for transparency. The facts are supported by the broader context of the impeachment tria
Por qué objetividad (82): The article emphasizes Cendaña's confident prediction of conviction, which may reflect a biased stance. While it mentions opposition to the subpoena, it doesn't adequately present alternative viewpoints or challenge the certainty of the outcome, leading to a slight imbalance.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependienteProgresistaVeracidad 85Objetividad 80hace 6 h Grupo aclama citación para el banco de Sara Duterte, registros de impuestosUn grupo de defensa no gubernamental llamado Pinoy Aksyon elogió la decisión de la corte de juicio político del Senado de citar a los registros bancarios y fiscales de la vicepresidenta Sara Duterte, llamándolo un paso hacia la transparencia. La solicitud tiene como objetivo investigar las acusaciones de que Duterte acumuló riqueza inexplicable durante su tiempo en el cargo, que no se refleja en su Declaración de Activos, Pasivos y Valor neto (SALN). El presidente de Pinoy Aksyon, Ben Cyrus Ellorin, enfatizó que la citación representa un compromiso con decisiones basadas en evidencia y plena divulgación. Los documentos, incluidos los de Duterte y su esposo, el abogado Manases Carpio, se presentarán a la corte de juicio político el 30 de julio.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca la citación como un paso positivo hacia la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas, alineándose con los valores progresistas.
Por qué veracidad (85): The article reports on the subpoena of Vice President Sara Duterte's bank and tax records as part of the impeachment proceedings. It quotes a non-government group, Pinoy Aksyon, expressing support for transparency. While the primary source document does not mention this specific group or their state
Por qué objetividad (80): The article presents the viewpoints of a non-government group supporting transparency, but it lacks balance by not mentioning opposing perspectives, such as the defense's claim that the subpoena is illegal and oppressive. The tone leans slightly towards supporting the subpoena effort.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependienteProgresistaVeracidad 85Objetividad 80ayer Cendaña: Duterte será condenado al 100 por ciento solo por las pruebasEl representante de la lista del Partido Akbayan, Perci Cendaña, afirmó que la vicepresidenta Sara Duterte será condenada en sus audiencias de juicio político basadas únicamente en evidencia, citando inconsistencias en sus revelaciones financieras. Cendaña enfatizó la necesidad de transparencia, instando al Senado a divulgar evidencia para garantizar la rendición de cuentas. El tribunal de juicio político decidirá sobre una solicitud de citación para los registros bancarios y fiscales de Duterte, que la fiscalía afirma que se relacionan con acusaciones de riqueza inexplicable. Los defensores del juicio político, incluidos Akbayan y otros grupos, se han reunido fuera del Senado para exigir transparencia, mientras que los jueces del Senado revisarán las solicitudes de citación antes de votarlas.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca el proceso de destitución como una cuestión de verdad y responsabilidad, enfatizando la necesidad de transparencia y acceso público a la evidencia.
Por qué veracidad (85): The article accurately reports Cendaña's statement about Duterte's potential conviction based on evidence. However, it adds commentary about the public protests and the monitoring of senator-judges, which introduces some subjective interpretation beyond the primary sources.
Por qué objetividad (80): The article shows some bias through its focus on the public protests and the implied criticism of the senator-judges. While it quotes Cendaña directly, the additional context about the protests and the monitoring of judges suggests a leaning toward the prosecution's perspective.
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Hazte suscriptor
PH
