ON
← Volver al feed
Evo što je poznati španjolski sudac rekao o poništenom golu Gvardiola
Croatia⚽ Deporteshace 12 h

Evo što je poznati španjolski sudac rekao o poništenom golu Gvardiola

During the dramatic quarter-final match of the World Cup between Croatia and Argentina, a controversial goal by Josko Gvardiol was disallowed due to a subtle handball by Croatian player Igor Matanović. The incident occurred in the 13th minute when Matanović barely touched the ball with his head, which was detected by the embedded chip in the ball. This led to the goal being nullified because the Croatian player was in an offside position at the moment of contact. Spanish referee Iturralde González explained that modern technology, including the chip in the ball, has eliminated human error in such decisions. He emphasized that the system automatically draws lines and determines offside positions, removing the need for manual intervention by referees. Despite this, the final decision to disallow the goal was made by Norwegian referee Espen Eskås. González clarified that the Portuguese defender Renato Veiga's subsequent touch did not negate the offside call, as it was considered an accidental deflection rather than an intentional kick.

1 informaciones

tportal logotportalIndependienteCentroVeracidad 85Objetividad 75hace 12 h
Evo što je poznati španjolski sudac rekao o poništenom golu Gvardiola

During the dramatic quarter-final match of the World Cup between Croatia and Argentina, a controversial goal by Josko Gvardiol was disallowed due to a subtle handball by Croatian player Igor Matanović. The incident occurred in the 13th minute when Matanović barely touched the ball with his head, which was detected by the embedded chip in the ball. This led to the goal being nullified because the Croatian player was in an offside position at the moment of contact. Spanish referee Iturralde González explained that modern technology, including the chip in the ball, has eliminated human error in such decisions. He emphasized that the system automatically draws lines and determines offside positions, removing the need for manual intervention by referees. Despite this, the final decision to disallow the goal was made by Norwegian referee Espen Eskås. González clarified that the Portuguese defender Renato Veiga's subsequent touch did not negate the offside call, as it was considered an accidental deflection rather than an intentional kick.

Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article discusses a sports event and focuses on the technical aspects of the offside call using modern football technology. There is no political framing, bias, or controversy related to politics, officials, or public policy. The content remains neutral and factual.

Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 85 · Objetividad 75): The article accurately describes the incident involving Matanović's contact with the ball and the subsequent goal being disallowed due to offside. It references the technology used and quotes Iturralde González, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it leans slightly towards supporting

Mantengamos las noticias honestas.

ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.

Hazte suscriptor

Historias relacionadas