La Oficina Nacional de Investigaciones (NPU) envió un informe por 148/10 a los miembros de la Ley de Procedimiento Penal (ZKP). Esto significa que la policía en el caso de Snežiča no presentó suficientes pruebas para demandar por el pago de una indemnización. El informe fue enviado de acuerdo con la ley, lo que significa que la policía no presentó pruebas penales, por lo que no se pudo presentar.
El asunto de Dars estalló en el otoño de 2023, cuando la televisión comercial POP TV publicó un testimonio de una mujer llamada Žvižgača, que dijo que había comprado un camión de nieve en un acuerdo de compra con Darsom. La televisión también publicó un postnetek, en el que Snežič recibió 5.000 euros, un total de 90.000 euros por compra.
En abril de 2024, la NPU publicó un reporte de irregularidades en los medios de comunicación, debido a la mala posición en la que se encontraba y a la falta de esfuerzos para aceptar que se llevara a cabo una investigación en Darsu, así como también en Hajdinjaku en Snežiču.
En caso de que la policía lo confirme, el Ministerio de Justicia especializado en el asunto enviará un informe de conformidad con la Ley de Procedimiento Penal, en el que se indicarán las consecuencias físicas concretas de la violación de los datos personales.
Rok Snežič dijo en su informe sobre el STA que el nuevo director de la NPU envió un informe a la justicia, que se esperaba un año antes, que en primer lugar la policía de Dars no había encontrado ninguna evidencia, que Rok Snežič había presentado ante la SDS 90.000 euros. La Fiscalía Estatal Especializada se basó en el informe de la policía y ahora decidió, pero el caso concluyó, pero requirió explicaciones adicionales o procedimientos adicionales.
Snežič también anunció una acción judicial en contra de Alenci Bratuškovi en Andreju Ribiču, que fue la última acusación que provocó. Su opinión es que el caso fue utilizado por los medios de comunicación con fines políticos, lo que provocó un ataque de los medios de comunicación. También expresó su preocupación sobre quién sería responsable de ello, lo que afectó a su reputación en la vida en los últimos dos años.
4 informaciones
N1 SlovenijaIndependienteIzquierdaVeracidad 90Objetividad 80hace 21 hThe article discusses the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption involving Rok Snežič, a former member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), in connection with the 'Dars' scandal. The National Prosecutorial Office (NPU) has concluded that there were insufficient grounds for criminal charges against Snežič due to lack of conclusive evidence regarding the receipt of €90,000 in bribes. The scandal emerged in autumn 2023 when a whistleblower claimed to have bribed Snežič to secure a position at Dars, a construction company. Despite initial denials by both Snežič and former Dars CEO Valentin Hajdinjak, the NPU conducted home searches in 2024. Six individuals were suspected of involvement, including Snežič and Damijan Jaklin, now a state secretary. The police confirmed they sent a report to the specialized state prosecutor’s office but did not specify which individuals were involved due to privacy concerns. Snežič stated that the report indicated no evidence of bribery.
Lectura del sesgo (Izquierda): The article frames the situation in a way that suggests the authorities failed to act decisively against political figures, implying potential systemic issues within the legal process. It emphasizes the lack of evidence against Snežič while highlighting the broader implications for political ethics.
Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 90 · Objetividad 80): Highly factual and consistent with other sources regarding NPU’s decision not to file charges against Snežič. Maintains neutrality by presenting information without emotive language. References to media exposure and legal procedures are accurately reported.
DomovinaIndependienteCentroVeracidad 88Objetividad 78hace 23 hThe article discusses the legal proceedings related to the 'DARS affair' involving Rok Snežič, a former executive at DARS. The National Prosecutorial Office (NPU) has submitted a report to the Specialized State Prosecutor’s Office under Article 148/10 of the Criminal Procedure Code but has not filed a criminal complaint against Snežič regarding alleged bribery for SDS. This indicates that based on collected evidence, there is insufficient basis for a criminal charge. The case is currently in the stage of preparing a state prosecutor's decision, with limited information being disclosed due to privacy concerns. The affair initially emerged in October 2023 when a hidden businessman claimed to have paid Snežič €90,000 for a job at DARS, suggesting funds might have gone to SDS. Both SDS and Snežič denied these allegations. The situation has had political implications, raising public concerns about potential corruption networks within DARS reaching opposition parties. Snežič claims the NPU's decision was expected and that the gathered evidence does not support the allegation of receiving a bribe.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article presents factual developments and legal procedures without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the actions of the NPU and the Specialized State Prosecutor’s Office, while also including statements from Rok Snežič and the denial by SDS. There is no clear ideological leaning
Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 88 · Objetividad 78): Accurate reporting on NPU’s actions and legal framework. Provides clear explanation of the difference between a report and a charge. Maintains balance but slightly leans towards emphasizing the implications of the NPU’s decision without overt bias.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)Estatal / públicoCentroVeracidad 85Objetividad 75hace 21 hThe article reports on the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption involving Rok Snežič, a member of the Slovenian Social Democracy Party (SDS), in connection with the Dars affair. The National Prosecution Office (NPU) has concluded that there were insufficient grounds for prosecution against Snežič, based on police findings that no evidence was collected proving he received €90,000 in bribes for the SDS. The case emerged in autumn 2023 after a whistleblower claimed Snežič was bribed to secure a position at Dars, a company involved in infrastructure projects. Despite initial denials by Snežič and former Dars CEO Valentin Hajdinjak, who later became the Minister of Defense, the NPU launched investigations in April 2024. Six individuals, including Snežič and former Dars employee Damijan Jaklin, were implicated. The police stated they sent a report to the specialized state prosecutor’s office but could not confirm specific individuals due to privacy concerns.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article presents information from both sides—Snežič denies receiving bribes, while the whistleblower claims otherwise. The reporting remains neutral, citing official sources such as the NPU and police, without overtly favoring either side. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing or ph
Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 85 · Objetividad 75): Factual accuracy is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on NPU not gathering sufficient evidence for charges against Snežič. However, the article includes direct quotes from Snežič which may introduce bias. The mention of 'domnevnega prejemanja podkupnine' is consistent with other reports
VečerIndependiente🔒CentroVeracidad 82Objetividad 70hace 17 hThe article reports that Rok Snežič, a tax advisor, has been cleared of criminal charges related to accepting a bribe in connection with the Dars affair. The National Prosecution Office (NPU) did not gather evidence against him in this context. A group of four plaintiffs has requested the initiation of a judicial investigation. The piece raises several questions regarding the allegations against Snežič, his response to the NPU, the origins of the Dars affair, and who else is involved in the case.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): The article presents factual information about the legal status of Rok Snežič in relation to the Dars affair without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It outlines the current situation based on available information and does not exhibit clear ideological leaning in its framing or use
Por qué estas puntuaciones (Veracidad 82 · Objetividad 70): Contains some factual elements but appears more focused on the legal process and potential consequences rather than providing full context. Includes less detailed background and omits some key points present in other articles, leading to lower objectivity due to focus on procedural aspects over bala
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Hazte suscriptor
Slovenia
