CJN prohíbe a los abogados usar "Barrister" como título

The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, has issued a directive barring lawyers from using the title “Barrister” as a prefix to their names in all official contexts. The order, contained in a circular dated July 13, 2026, and signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court, Kabir Akanbi, mandates immediate compliance. The circular addresses litigation staff, legal practitioners, court registrars, and lawyers, stating that the use of the term “Barrister” is inappropriate and inconsistent with the professional standards expected within the Supreme Court of Nigeria. The directive applies to all official correspondence, records, documents, identity materials, and other official engagements. The circular explicitly instructs all affected officers to discontinue the use of the title “Barrister” before their names. It also directs heads of departments and unit heads to ensure strict adherence to the directive by all personnel under their supervision. The CJN emphasized that the use of the title undermines the integrity of the legal profession and fails to align with international norms regarding legal titles. The move follows growing concerns about the misuse of the term, particularly among non-practicing individuals who adopt the title to assert their status as legal professionals. The use of “Barrister” as a courtesy title preceding names has been a longstanding tradition in Nigeria, despite its lack of official recognition. While the term originated in Britain and refers to a lawyer qualified to argue cases in court, it is not used as a formal title in any jurisdiction where lawyers are licensed. In Nigeria, lawyers are enrolled as Barristers and Solicitors of the Supreme Court, reflecting the country’s fused legal system, which allows practitioners to perform both roles. However, the use of “Barrister” as a title rather than a designation has gained popularity, often being adopted by individuals not actively practicing law. Legal experts and regulatory bodies have previously raised concerns about the widespread use of the title. The Council of Legal Education, for instance, recently cautioned prospective lawyers against wearing wigs and gowns or presenting themselves as qualified legal practitioners before being formally called to the Nigerian Bar. Such actions were deemed to undermine the dignity of the legal profession and could result in disciplinary action. Similarly, the Body of Benchers, through its chairman, HRM Albert Akpomuje, SAN, highlighted the improper use of the “Barrister” title, noting that it is particularly prevalent among political figures who seek to signal their legal credentials without being in active practice. The CJN’s directive appears to be part of broader efforts to standardize professional conduct and reinforce the authority of the judiciary. By prohibiting the use of the title in official capacities, the CJN aims to eliminate confusion and maintain consistency with global legal practices. The decision also reflects ongoing discussions about the regulation of legal titles and the need for greater clarity in distinguishing between legal practitioners and non-practitioners. The CJN has not yet addressed the use of the postnominal “Esq.” (Esquire), which is commonly used by lawyers in Nigeria, although it is not officially recognized either. As the directive takes effect, legal professionals across Nigeria will be required to adjust their official documentation and communications. Compliance will be enforced through internal oversight mechanisms, with supervisors tasked with ensuring adherence to the new rules. The impact of the ruling may extend beyond the courtroom, influencing how legal professionals present themselves in public and private spheres. The CJN’s stance signals a renewed focus on professionalism and ethical conduct within the legal community, setting a precedent for future reforms.