La burocracia y la furia de la regulación: un chaleco de plomo en rojo, blanco y rojo [premium]

Austrian trade opening hours have become outdated, according to recent political commentary. Economic Minister Martin Hattmannsdorf of the People’s Party supports a proposal by NEOS politician Josef Schellhorn to exempt unmanned sales boxes from current legal restrictions. This move follows a discussion initiated by REWE boss Marcel Haraszti regarding retail flexibility. Hattmannsdorf has left open whether local shops might soon remain open until 7 p.m. on Saturdays or 9 p.m. on Thursdays, though he demands negotiations within the government coalition. Advocates argue that securing value creation and jobs requires allowing flexibility, provided this happens in close coordination with employees. There is also a push to allow shop owners who stand behind the counter themselves to operate on Sundays, noting that many citizens are willing to work on that day. The debate extends beyond retail schedules into broader bureaucratic reform. Schellhorn, the State Secretary for Deregulation and De-bureaucratization, often faces frustration from entrepreneurs asking why promised relief has not yet arrived. He notes that while Argentina under President Javier Milei fired 15,000 civil servants overnight, the Austrian constitution prevents such drastic measures, which he considers appropriate. However, he asserts that key decisions have been made and the process is moving forward. He warns against the perception that nothing is progressing, stating that federal-level issues, such as accelerated commercial law procedures and energy infrastructure expansion, are already advancing. Monika Koppl-Turyna, head of the think tank Eco Austria, conducted a comprehensive study highlighting bureaucracy as a heavy burden on the economy. Her research suggests that consistent de-bureaucratisation could increase Austrian economic output by 20 billion euros by 2032. Currently, administrative tasks consume seven percent of total working time in companies. Koppl-Turyna analyzed 4,700 submissions to the state online platform SEDA, where citizens report their experiences with official processes. She identified federalism as a major pain point due to unclear competence distribution and poor communication between authorities, often driven by power retention. She calls for a federalism reform that establishes clear responsibilities and financial transparency. Critics also point to a lack of risk culture among businesses and representatives. Koppl-Turyna cites Scandinavian models, specifically Sweden and Denmark, as examples where social security and market economies coexist effectively. In Denmark, the Once Only principle ensures data is submitted once and shared digitally between agencies by law. New laws undergo a Digital Check and are rejected if not fully automatable. In contrast, the Social Democratic Party in Austria demanded a right to an analogue life in 2024. Their leader, Andreas Babler, pushed for a legal claim to free paper invoices in his Heart and Mind plan. Schellhorn advocates for a One Stop Shop for bureaucratic tasks but acknowledges that this initiative fails due to blockades from several states. His criticism notably omits the Styria region, governed by the Freedom Party, which drew resentment within the three-party coalition. Despite this, Styrian Governor Mario Kunasek presented a comprehensive package to reduce red tape just last Thursday. This package includes abolishing vacancy fees, reducing mandatory chimney sweep appointments, repealing dance school laws, and removing approval requirements. These moves signal ongoing efforts to streamline regulations despite persistent structural challenges.