Donald Trump has expressed fury over the appointment of Ed Miliband as the United Kingdom’s foreign secretary, citing the former Labour leader’s past criticisms of him. According to reports, the White House is “deeply concerned” about the move, with Trump’s administration warning that the new role could complicate diplomatic relations between the U.S. and the UK. Miliband, who took office on Monday as part of Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s newly formed government, has long been vocal in his disdain for Trump, calling him a “racist, misogynistic, self-confessed groper” during the 2016 presidential campaign. The tensions between the two men date back over a decade. Miliband has repeatedly criticized Trump’s policies and rhetoric, particularly regarding climate change and democracy. In 2017, he referred to the president as someone who had “lowered the bar for idiocy.” He also condemned Trump’s “incredibly peculiar relationship with Russia” and accused him of undermining political norms. His public disapproval of Trump’s stance on oil and gas exploration in the North Sea has further strained relations, with Trump accusing Miliband of being an “extreme” environmentalist who blocks fossil fuel expansion. A source close to the White House told The Independent that Trump does not forget past slights and that Miliband has “some serious diplomatic repair to undertake.” This sentiment echoes concerns raised by a consultant working with both the White House and the State Department, who remarked that Miliband’s appointment is “going down like a lead balloon” and that the U.S. government no longer takes the UK seriously. The consultant noted that Miliband is viewed in Washington as an “unreasonable ‘net zero’ extremist” who opposed North Sea oil production but supported the UK’s purchase of Norwegian fossil fuels. Burnham, the new prime minister, selected Miliband for the role partly due to his experience in international affairs during his tenure as energy secretary under Sir Keir Starmer. However, the decision has drawn criticism, especially from former leaders like Boris Johnson, who argued that Miliband’s actions as Labour leader contributed to geopolitical shifts. Johnson claimed that Miliband’s refusal to support military intervention in Syria in 2013—when Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons, led directly to Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014. He tweeted that the Kremlin would be “delighted” with Burnham’s choice, suggesting that Miliband’s policies have had far-reaching consequences. Miliband’s tenure as Labour leader included a notable stance against the Iraq War, which he described as a “fundamental loss of trust” in the party. His opposition to the 2003 invasion set him apart from previous Labour leaders like Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and even from his own brother, David Miliband, who had supported the war. While Miliband did not personally vote on the Iraq War during his early parliamentary career, he later acknowledged that he was constrained by collective ministerial responsibility during his time in government. A subsequent inquiry into the war concluded that the invasion was based on flawed intelligence and contributed to the rise of groups like ISIS. As foreign secretary, Miliband has pledged to prioritize global stability, strengthening ties with the EU, NATO, and the UN. He has also emphasized the importance of supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression and has outlined plans to address conflicts in the Middle East, including efforts toward peace in Palestine and Israel. Despite these ambitions, his appointment has sparked controversy, with some fearing that his progressive views on climate and international cooperation may clash with U.S. interests, particularly under a presidency that favors fossil fuel expansion. Miliband’s personal history adds another layer to the debate. He spent childhood years in Boston, Massachusetts, where his father, a Marxist academic, taught. He is a fan of baseball and a supporter of the Boston Red Sox. His background reflects a blend of intellectual rigor and cultural connection to the U.S., yet his public statements have often placed him at odds with American political figures. Government ministers have attempted to reassure the U.S. that Miliband’s appointment will not harm bilateral relations, emphasizing that the UK government will remain committed to working with its allies.
4 informaciones
Middle East EyeIndependienteProgresistaVeracidad 50Objetividad 40hace 7 hEd Miliband, el recién nombrado Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores del Reino Unido bajo el primer ministro Andy Burnham, enfatizó su compromiso de defender los valores británicos arraigados en la historia de su familia como refugiados judíos de la persecución nazi. Reconoció la creciente inestabilidad global y las amenazas al derecho internacional y la democracia, afirmando que Gran Bretaña fortalecería los lazos con la UE, la OTAN y la ONU mientras apoya a Ucrania contra la invasión de Rusia.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo destaca la postura progresista de Miliband en los asuntos internacionales, incluida la oposición a las intervenciones militares en Irak y Siria, el apoyo al Estado palestino y la alineación con las asociaciones globales del sur.
Por qué veracidad (50): The article primarily focuses on Miliband's foreign policy views and does not discuss the 2013 Syria vote or its implications. It mentions his past positions on Syria but lacks direct reference to the primary source document. As such, it fails to provide sufficient information to assess the factual
Por qué objetividad (40): The article presents Miliband's views on international issues without providing a balanced perspective on the debate around his 2013 Syria vote. It emphasizes his current role and past stances without addressing differing viewpoints or contextualizing the controversy.
The IndependentIndependienteConservadorVeracidad 30Objetividad 20hace 6 hEl artículo informa que la Casa Blanca está "profundamente preocupada" por el nombramiento de Ed Miliband como secretario de Relaciones Exteriores del Reino Unido, citando críticas pasadas de Miliband a Donald Trump. La administración de Trump afirma que Miliband tiene "serias reparaciones diplomáticas que emprender" debido a sus duros comentarios anteriores sobre Trump, incluido llamarlo "racista, misógino, autoconfesado". El artículo señala que Miliband ha criticado las políticas de Trump sobre el cambio climático y su relación con Rusia, lo que llevó a percepciones negativas en Washington. También menciona que el primer ministro Andy Burnham seleccionó a Miliband para el papel a pesar de la oposición del ala derecha de su partido, con el objetivo de alinear la Oficina de Relaciones Exteriores con los objetivos climáticos del Reino Unido.
Lectura del sesgo (Conservador): El artículo enmarca la controversia en torno a las críticas pasadas de Miliband a Trump, enfatizando la percepción negativa de él en Washington.
Por qué veracidad (30): The article contains speculative claims about Trump's reaction to Miliband's appointment and references past criticisms of Trump without citing primary sources. It misrepresents the connection between Miliband's Syria vote and Trump's policies, lacking factual basis in the primary source document.
Por qué objetividad (20): The tone is clearly biased towards portraying Miliband as controversial and Trump as unfairly targeted. The article uses emotionally charged language and frames the situation in a way that suggests personal vendetta rather than objective reporting.
The IndependentIndependienteConservadorVeracidad 30Objetividad 20hace 7 h Boris Johnson afirma que Ed Miliband es el culpable de la invasión de Putin a UcraniaEl ex primer ministro del Reino Unido, Boris Johnson, criticó el nombramiento de Ed Miliband como secretario de Relaciones Exteriores, acusándolo de ser responsable de la invasión de Vladimir Putin a Ucrania. Johnson argumentó que el "fracaso de Miliband en enfrentarse a Assad" en Siria contribuyó a la decisión de Putin de invadir Ucrania en 2014. El artículo hace referencia a las acciones pasadas de Miliband, incluida su renuencia a apoyar la intervención militar en Siria en 2013 y su postura posterior sobre permitir que Assad se postule en una elección democrática.
Lectura del sesgo (Conservador): El artículo enmarca las decisiones pasadas de Miliband como si tuvieran consecuencias negativas directas para las relaciones internacionales, en particular vinculando sus acciones a la invasión de Ucrania por parte de Putin.
Por qué veracidad (30): The article repeats the false claim that Miliband's 2013 Syria vote directly caused Putin's invasion of Ukraine, which is not supported by the primary source document. This is a significant factual error and misrepresentation of the historical context.
Por qué objetividad (20): The article presents a one-sided narrative blaming Miliband for geopolitical events, using strong language like 'appalling choice' and 'Kremlin will be delighted.' It shows no attempt to present alternative perspectives or balance the argument.
Middle East EyeIndependienteProgresistahace 8 h Ed Miliband, nuevo secretario de Asuntos Exteriores del Reino Unido, sobre Israel, Irak, Siria e IránEd Miliband, recién nombrado secretario de Relaciones Exteriores del Reino Unido por el primer ministro Andy Burnham, ha esbozado sus prioridades centradas en fortalecer las alianzas internacionales, abordar la inestabilidad global y buscar la paz en regiones como Palestina-Israel e Irán. Miliband, ex líder laborista, se ha opuesto históricamente a ciertas intervenciones militares, incluida la Guerra de Irak, que criticó como injustificada. Anteriormente votó en contra de la acción militar en Siria y apoyó el reconocimiento de un estado palestino. Su nombramiento se produce en medio de las tensiones geopolíticas en curso, y enfatizó el compromiso de Gran Bretaña de apoyar a Ucrania contra la invasión de Rusia y buscar soluciones a los conflictos en el Medio Oriente.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo destaca la oposición histórica de Miliband a las acciones militares como la Guerra de Irak y su apoyo al reconocimiento del Estado palestino, que se alinea con las posturas de izquierda.
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Hazte suscriptor
United Kingdom
