Manila, Philippines, The Philippine government has refuted claims by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blocked his proposal for a P10,000 cash assistance program for every Filipino family. According to palace officials, the failure of the initiative lies with Cayetano's own actions rather than any obstruction from the president. During a press briefing held on July 20, 2026, Undersecretary Claire Castro stated that there was no basis for Marcos to have rejected the proposal since Cayetano had already submitted the measure prior to the president taking office. This assertion comes in response to Cayetano's recent allegations that Marcos had refused to support his plan for universal financial aid. Castro emphasized that the responsibility for the stalled proposal rests squarely on Cayetano. She pointed out that the senator had previously made similar promises while serving in Congress, yet none of these initiatives had progressed beyond the initial stages. “Senator Alan Cayetano’s shortcomings, his slow pace and inability to fulfill his promises, should not be blamed on others,” Castro remarked. To back her claims, Castro presented several newspaper articles from 2021 and 2022, which detailed Cayetano's early advocacy for the cash aid program. These documents highlighted that the proposal had been introduced well before Marcos assumed the presidency. “If a proposal is beneficial and feasible, there’s no reason it can’t be passed. And when the 2022 national budget was approved, President Marcos Jr. wasn't even President yet,” she noted. Furthermore, Castro criticized Cayetano for not fully believing in his own proposal. She suggested that even former President Rodrigo Duterte, who is considered a political ally of Cayetano, seemed skeptical about the feasibility of the P10,000 aid package. “It seems he doesn’t even believe in his own proposed bill, and it appears he hasn’t studied it thoroughly, because he’s asking for around P200 billion,” Castro said. In a separate communication via Viber, Castro accused Cayetano of spreading unfounded narratives. She argued that instead of accepting accountability for his lack of progress, the senator was deflecting blame onto others to avoid embarrassment. “Why can’t Sen. Alan Cayetano stop himself from stirring up intrigue and peddling baseless stories? Instead of acknowledging his own negligence in his duties, he points fingers at others just to save himself from embarrassment. He passes the work he fails to accomplish onto other people,” she wrote. Cayetano has faced criticism from various quarters for his handling of legislative proposals. Earlier this year, Senator Bongbong Marcos, the president's son, had called for greater accountability among lawmakers regarding their commitments. Meanwhile, some members of the opposition have expressed concern over the potential impact of unfulfilled campaign promises on public trust in the political process. The controversy surrounding the P10,000 aid proposal underscores broader issues within the legislative branch concerning the implementation of populist policies. While such programs often gain traction during election seasons, they frequently face challenges related to funding, bureaucratic hurdles, and political will once implemented. As the debate continues, attention will remain focused on whether Cayetano can provide evidence supporting his claims against the administration. The situation highlights the need for transparency and follow-through in political commitments, especially as the country navigates economic uncertainties and social challenges.
2 informaciones
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependienteConservadorVeracidad 75Objetividad 65hace 11 h Cayetano, no Marcos, es el culpable del fracaso de la ayuda de P10,000 PalacioEl palacio presidencial filipino ha negado la afirmación del senador Alan Peter Cayetano de que el presidente Ferdinand Marcos Jr. bloqueó su programa de ayuda en efectivo de P10,000 propuesto para cada familia filipina. Según la subsecretaria Claire Castro, el fracaso de la propuesta radica en el propio Cayetano, quien introdujo la medida antes de que Marcos asumiera el cargo y no la avanzó mientras servía en el Congreso. El palacio enfatizó que si la propuesta fuera viable, se habría incluido en el presupuesto nacional de 2022, que fue aprobado antes de que Marcos se convirtiera en presidente. Castro también señaló que incluso el ex presidente Rodrigo Duterte, un aliado político de Cayetano, parecía no convencido del plan. El palacio criticó a Cayetano por repetir la promesa como una promesa de campaña a pesar de no avanzar en ella y lo acusó de difundir narraciones infundadas para desviar la culpa.
Lectura del sesgo (Conservador): El artículo enmarca al senador Alan Peter Cayetano como responsable del fracaso de su programa de ayuda propuesto, atribuyendo el problema a sus "deficiencias", "ritmo lento" y "incapacidad para cumplir promesas".
Por qué veracidad (75): The article reports that Malacañang attributed the failure of the P10,000 aid proposal to Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano rather than President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., citing that the proposal was filed before Marcos took office. This aligns with the cross-source consensus that Cayetano's lack of progress an
Por qué objetividad (65): The tone is somewhat confrontational, with the Palace spokesperson directly criticizing Cayetano's performance and using emotionally charged language like 'slow pace' and 'jetski campaign promise.' The article frames the issue as a political dispute between Cayetano and the administration, showing b
GMA News OnlineIndependienteProgresistaVeracidad 60Objetividad 55anteayer Alan Peter Cayetano, señalando que Marcos no tiene una ayuda de P10K después de las elecciones de 2022El artículo informa que Alan Peter Cayetano acusó a Ferdinand Marcos Jr. de oponerse al programa de asistencia en efectivo de P10,000 después de ganar las elecciones de 2022. La afirmación sugiere que Marcos criticó la iniciativa de ayuda, que era parte de un esfuerzo de bienestar social más amplio por parte de la administración. La declaración implica un desacuerdo político sobre las políticas económicas y los programas de apoyo social. No se proporcionan más detalles o contexto sobre la naturaleza de las críticas o sus implicaciones.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca la acusación contra Marcos como una crítica política, lo que implica que su oposición al programa de ayuda refleja una postura que se alinea con posiciones más conservadoras o económicamente cautelosas.
Por qué veracidad (60): This article states that President Marcos allegedly criticized the P10K aid proposal after winning the 2022 election, but it does not provide specific evidence or quotes to support this claim. It also mentions that the proposal was previously publicized in 2021 and 2022, which is consistent with oth
Por qué objetividad (55): The phrasing is highly biased, suggesting that Marcos 'allegedly' criticized the proposal, implying a lack of substantiation. The article appears to take a partisan stance in favor of Cayetano, presenting the narrative without balance or neutrality.
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Hazte suscriptor