ON
← Back to feed
Zepto delivery agent 'harasses' Bengaluru woman; company terminates his ID
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

Zepto delivery agent 'harasses' Bengaluru woman; company terminates his ID

A woman in Bengaluru posted a video on Instagram alleging that a Zepto delivery partner repeatedly asked to enter her home despite her refusal, causing her fear. The delivery partner initially came to deliver an order and asked for drinking water, which she provided. After finishing the water, he allegedly insisted on entering her home multiple times, even after she declined. When she attempted to close the gate, he rang the doorbell repeatedly and eventually began banging on the gate. The woman stated that Zepto responded by issuing a restraining order against the delivery partner and terminating his account. She mentioned she did not report the incident to the police due to lack of personal details about the delivery partner. This incident follows a similar case involving a Flipkart delivery executive who was recently arrested for alleged sexual harassment.

A woman in Bengaluru has accused a Zepto delivery agent of harassment after he repeatedly asked to enter her home, according to a video she posted on social media. The incident led to the termination of the delivery agent’s ID by the company, as revealed in a follow-up post by the woman. The video shows the woman recounting how the delivery partner arrived at her residence to deliver an order and then asked for drinking water. She gave him a bottle and told him he could keep it. After finishing the bottle, the delivery partner returned asking for more water. The woman alleges that he then insisted on entering the house for five minutes despite her repeated refusals. She claims she offered him space outside where he could sit, but the delivery agent persisted in his requests. As she attempted to close the gate, he rang the doorbell multiple times and again asked if he could come inside for a few minutes. The woman said she felt frightened and locked the door, remaining inside. She described how the delivery partner then began banging on the gate. In the video, she called on Zepto to investigate the incident and criticized the company’s complaint process. In a subsequent video, the woman stated that Zepto had issued a restraining order against the driver, preventing him from approaching her house, and had terminated his ID. She explained that she did not report the incident to the police because she lacked the delivery partner’s personal details. “I didn’t go to the police because I didn’t have any details of the rider,” she said. This follows a similar case earlier this month, where a delivery executive from Flipkart was arrested after a woman alleged that he entered her flat without permission and sexually harassed her after requesting to use her washroom. Zepto, which operates as a food delivery platform, has faced increasing scrutiny over its safety protocols and the conduct of its delivery agents. The incident with the Bengaluru woman highlights ongoing concerns about the interactions between delivery personnel and customers, particularly in situations where boundaries are perceived to be crossed. While the company has taken action by terminating the rider’s ID, critics argue that more robust measures are needed to prevent such incidents. The woman’s account aligns with reports of growing unease among users regarding the behavior of delivery agents. Some users have raised concerns about the lack of clear guidelines and accountability mechanisms within delivery platforms. The recent arrest of the Flipkart delivery executive underscores the seriousness of these allegations and the potential legal consequences for misconduct. The incident has sparked discussions on the need for better training and oversight of delivery agents, as well as improved reporting systems for customers who feel uncomfortable during deliveries. Advocacy groups have called for stricter regulations to ensure the safety of both customers and delivery workers. Meanwhile, Zepto continues to operate under increased public pressure to address these issues transparently. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on the actions taken by Zepto following the incident. The termination of the delivery agent’s ID marks a direct response to the woman’s allegations, though questions remain about whether additional steps will be taken to prevent future occurrences. The broader implications of the case extend beyond individual incidents, raising broader concerns about the responsibilities of delivery platforms in ensuring safe and respectful interactions between their employees and customers.

1 reports

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
Zepto delivery agent 'harasses' Bengaluru woman; company terminates his ID

A woman in Bengaluru posted a video on Instagram alleging that a Zepto delivery partner repeatedly asked to enter her home despite her refusal, causing her fear. The delivery partner initially came to deliver an order and asked for drinking water, which she provided. After finishing the water, he allegedly insisted on entering her home multiple times, even after she declined. When she attempted to close the gate, he rang the doorbell repeatedly and eventually began banging on the gate. The woman stated that Zepto responded by issuing a restraining order against the delivery partner and terminating his account. She mentioned she did not report the incident to the police due to lack of personal details about the delivery partner. This incident follows a similar case involving a Flipkart delivery executive who was recently arrested for alleged sexual harassment.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on an incident involving a private company's employee and does not present a clear ideological slant. It provides the account of the complainant and mentions the company's response without overtly favoring either side. There is no indication of biased language or selective fact-p

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a claim made by a woman in Bengaluru who alleges harassment by a Zepto delivery partner. It cites the social media video as a primary source and describes the sequence of events as presented by the woman. While no official documentation is available, the reporting aligns with

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the woman's allegations as the central narrative and includes her direct quotes. While it mentions Zepto's response, it frames the situation primarily through the victim's perspective, potentially giving more weight to her account than alternative viewpoints. The language used (

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories