ON
← Back to feed
Alice Evans and Ioan Gruffudd's bitter divorce is over: Judge rules that actor must increase maintenance payments despite 'online harassment' campaign against him and wife Bianca
United Kingdom🏛️ Politics6 hr. ago

Alice Evans and Ioan Gruffudd's bitter divorce is over: Judge rules that actor must increase maintenance payments despite 'online harassment' campaign against him and wife Bianca

The divorce proceedings between actor Ioan Gruffudd and former spouse Alice Evans have concluded, with a court ruling requiring Gruffudd to increase his maintenance payments to Evans. The case involved a nine-day hearing in Los Angeles where the judge granted Gruffudd a restraining order against Evans due to allegations of harassment and abuse toward him and his new wife, Bianca Wallace. However, on financial matters, the judge largely supported Evans, determining that Gruffudd had underpaid her by $27,000 rather than the $400,000 he claimed. Evans, who has custody of their two daughters, will receive 10% of Gruffudd’s gross income, amounting to $1,862 monthly, as stipulated by their prenuptial agreement. The judge criticized Evans for not timely disclosing a $168,000 savings account, which affected her credibility, while also rejecting Gruffudd’s argument that the online harassment campaign constituted a valid reason to avoid payments.

1 reports

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentCenter6 hr. ago
Alice Evans and Ioan Gruffudd's bitter divorce is over: Judge rules that actor must increase maintenance payments despite 'online harassment' campaign against him and wife Bianca

The divorce proceedings between actor Ioan Gruffudd and former spouse Alice Evans have concluded, with a court ruling requiring Gruffudd to increase his maintenance payments to Evans. The case involved a nine-day hearing in Los Angeles where the judge granted Gruffudd a restraining order against Evans due to allegations of harassment and abuse toward him and his new wife, Bianca Wallace. However, on financial matters, the judge largely supported Evans, determining that Gruffudd had underpaid her by $27,000 rather than the $400,000 he claimed. Evans, who has custody of their two daughters, will receive 10% of Gruffudd’s gross income, amounting to $1,862 monthly, as stipulated by their prenuptial agreement. The judge criticized Evans for not timely disclosing a $168,000 savings account, which affected her credibility, while also rejecting Gruffudd’s argument that the online harassment campaign constituted a valid reason to avoid payments.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a private divorce case involving financial and legal decisions made by a court. While there are mentions of restraining orders and allegations of harassment, these are specific to the individuals involved and do not relate to broader political issues, policies, or governance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories