Why has the wildlife landfill rehabilitation failed? Ministry: No bid, costs skyrocket
The cleanup of illegal waste at the PPK Velebit site in Gospić has entered a new phase, with the estimated cost of removing scattered waste near the silo increasing from 2.1 million to 4.72 million euros before VAT. The Environmental Protection Fund is seeking contractors for the removal of approximately 650 tons of waste in 'big bag' containers, while exploring options for handling buried waste abroad. The Ministry of Environment and Green Transition detailed the timeline of actions taken by both the ministry and the fund since the site was included in the Waste Management Plan in May last year. Despite efforts to attract bids through public tenders, no offers were received initially. Additional consultations with potential contractors revealed that the technical requirements and costs depend heavily on the composition of the waste, particularly chlorine content. Due to these findings, the estimated cost of the first phase of remediation increased significantly. A separate tender process has been initiated specifically for the removal of the 650 tons of non-hazardous waste in big bags, with an estimated value of 400,000 euros before VAT. The deadline for submitting bids in botht 1
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković addressed concerns over hazardous waste found in Gospić, Lika, stating that the situation is being handled at legal, remediation, and political levels. According to measurements conducted by the Croatian Institute for Public Health (HZJZ), there is no threat to drinking water. Plenković emphasized that representatives from the Environmental Protection Fund (FZOEU) and Krunoslav Capak from HZJZ confirmed that no danger exists for drinking water in Lika. He requested HZJZ to report publicly on water quality within three to four days. Further actions depend on criminal proceedings and investigations. The government has issued public calls for the cleanup of waste, with 32,000 tons buried at the former PKK Velebit site and 5,000 tons on the surface. The government will seek financial compensation, as ecocide is being introduced into the Criminal Code. Two meetings were held involving the cabinet and members of the ruling coalition to discuss the issue of illegal dumping of large quantities of waste in several locations in Lika, including Gospić, Štikada, and Lički Osik. USKOK initiated an investigation against Josip and Monika Šinc and other suspects last year, which has since expanded to new locations and additional individuals. Plenković stated that the issue is being treated on three levels: the penal level managed by the State Judicial Administration (DORH) and USKOK, the remediation level managed by the Environmental Protection Fund and coordinated by the Ministry of Environmental Protection, and the political level led by the opposition seeking to gain political points through misinformation and spreading panic among residents of Gospić and the Ličko-Senjska county. He noted that the opposition, driven by changes in public opinion and political trends, has used the waste situation to attract media attention. Plenković acknowledged the opposition's desire for media attention, noting that the tourism season is performing well and will likely exceed last year's performance, contributing positively to economic growth. He mentioned the slowdown in inflation pressures, regulation of energy and fuel prices, maintaining investment credit ratings, and addressing injustices from the Račan government towards defenders. Regarding the costs of removing hazardous waste, Plenković stated that the waste contains hazardous materials and procedures require finding companies capable of handling such waste. Croatia currently lacks suitable facilities or sites for this purpose. The Environmental Protection Fund is currently contacting companies across Europe to handle the waste. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Spatial Planning, Construction, and State Property Branko Bačić addressed concerns regarding illegal hazardous waste dumps in Lika and outlined the government’s plans for remediation. He assured citizens that the government understands their concerns and is taking all necessary steps to maintain the quality of drinking water, emphasizing continuous monitoring and testing of water quality. He highlighted that the government has elevated the activities of relevant ministries to the highest level, guided by three principles: daily and continuous measurement of water samples in Lika, regular publication of test results even if negative, and immediate remediation and restoration of the area in Gospić. Bačić noted that the first public tender for the cleanup failed due to lack of bids, while the second deadline is set for August 25. However, the ministry and the Environmental Protection Fund have already started negotiations with around 70 European companies to handle the buried waste. If no acceptable bids are received by August 25, the surface waste of 4,500 tons and 650 tons in large bags will be addressed immediately. He stressed that the government is not waiting and is actively working on solutions. Regarding the removal of hazardous waste, Bačić explained that the first phase of the negotiation process involves market research and that contacted companies are asked to submit proposals for the disposal and management of hazardous waste. He indicated that approximately 30,000 tons of buried waste would be removed and transported abroad, going to the country whose company provides the most comprehensive and comprehensive proposal. Gospić Mayor Darko Milinović criticized the government and Prime Minister Plenković for their handling of the hazardous waste situation in Gospić. He claimed that the government could have initiated direct negotiations for remediation, but instead lost over a year and a half without removing a single kilogram of the controversial waste. He pointed out that the city was warned in 2023 about the dumping of tens of thousands of tons of waste and the concerns of citizens regarding water safety. Milinović accused the government of lying when Plenković stated that direct negotiations could not be initiated immediately. He argued that the law allows for direct negotiations in unforeseen situations beyond the control of the contracting party. He criticized the change in the amount of waste from 3,500 to 4,150 tons, which prevented the initiation of direct negotiations again. He expressed frustration that no progress had been made despite the time elapsed. He also questioned who is responsible for the situation, indicating that the chief state prosecutor had responded to his request, though the response was related to lithium. He suggested that the government does not know how to handle the waste and criticized the comparison to the situation in Varazdin, where no chemical elements threatening human health were found. Mayor Milinović emphasized that direct negotiations are not optional but mandatory in the case of Gospić. He criticized the government for its inaction and failure to address the issue promptly. The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition detailed the chronology of actions taken in the case of the illegal waste dump in Gospić. It noted that the location was included in the Waste Management Plan in May of last year, creating a legal basis for the Environmental Protection Fund to conduct the cleanup. However, preparatory work on the site could not begin until mid-November 2025 due to investigative activities in the criminal proceeding. After USKOK informed the fund that there were no obstacles to accessing the site, an investigation of domestic and international markets was conducted. In February of this year, a public procurement process was launched for the first phase of the cleanup, specifically the removal and disposal of scattered waste near the silo. Despite allowing interested companies to take samples and familiarize themselves with the site conditions, no bids were received. As a result, the fund conducted additional consultations with potential contractors in July. Technical requirements and the cost of disposal largely depend on the composition of the waste, particularly the chlorine content. Higher chlorine content requires more complex and expensive thermal processing abroad. Due to new findings, the estimated value of the first phase of the cleanup increased from 2.1 million to 4.72 million euros excluding VAT. Deadlines have also changed: the selected contractor will have a maximum of 12 months to remove the scattered waste from the site and another 12 months for its final reuse and disposal. A separate procurement process has been initiated for the removal of approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste in big bags. The estimated value of this task is 400,000 euros excluding VAT, with a six-month deadline for execution. The deadline for submitting bids in both processes expires at the end of August. The more complex issue of buried waste remains unresolved. The fund initially contacted 15 foreign operators and later sent inquiries to approximately 60 addresses of waste disposal operators and power plants in the European Union. Four inquiries were also sent regarding the possibility of long-term storage of waste in closed former salt mines. Possible solutions are being investigated, including data from reports by the Faculty of Geotechnics. The Ministry emphasized that preferred options include disposal at hazardous waste landfills or energy recovery, with the possibility of combining these solutions. Parallel to the cleanup, possible effects of the waste on the environment and the health of the population are being examined. The Ministry requested expert opinions on the presence of PFAS compounds and the safety of drinking water, which the Croatian Institute for Public Health confirmed as safe. At the end of July, representatives of the government, the Ministry, and the fund met with the civil initiative "Gospić is our home." They agreed to publish all available analyses, submit requests for the disclosure of the entire forensic report from the criminal proceedings, and consider the possibility of expanding the network of monitoring stations for groundwater. A new meeting is scheduled to be held by September 20, when models for the cleanup of buried waste are expected to be presented. The Ministry emphasized that it did not issue permits or conduct inspections.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Premijer Andrej Plenković objasnio je situaciju s ilegalnim odlaganjem otpada u Lici, uključujući Gospić, Štikadu i Lički Osik, naglašavajući da nema ugroze za pitku vodu prema podacima Hrvatskog zavoda za javno zdravstvo. Naglasio je da su na sastanku sudjelovali predstavnici Fonda za zaštitu okoliša i Krunoslav Capak iz HZJZ, koji su potvrdili sigurnost vode. Plenković je također istaknuo da su aktivnosti u sanaciji ovisile o kaznenom postupku i izvidima, te da je vlada planira financijsku nadoknadu. Dodatno, kritizirao je oporbu za iskorištavanje teme za političke poene i širenje panike putem dezinformacija.
Bias read (Center): Artikl neutralno prikazuje situaciju s otpadom kao politički i državni problem, citira službene izvore (HZJZ, Fond za zaštitu okoliša), i kritizira oporbu za političko iskorištavanje teme bez evidentnog stranih slanja. Nema jednostrane izvoreništva ili izbjegava izrazito političke stajališta, što ga
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Premier Plenković's statements regarding the handling of hazardous waste in Gospić, citing the Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) and mentioning specific figures like 37,000 tons of waste. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus, particularly with Art
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting Plenković’s statements without overt bias. However, it does emphasize the government's actions and responses, which may slightly favor the official narrative over alternative perspectives.
Ministar prostornog uređenja, graditeljstva i državne imovine Branko Bačić odgovorio je na pitanja vezana uz ilegalna odlagališta opasnog otpada u Lici, te planove za njihovu sanaciju. U toku razgovora sa gostom Dnevnika HRT-a, Bačić je objasnio da je vlada podigla aktivnosti svih relevantnih ministarstava na najvišu razinu i da se vodi tri načela: kontinuirano mjerenje kvalitete vode, javno objavljivanje podataka i brzo uklanjanje otpada. Nije čekao tradicionalni natječaj za sanaciju koji je zakazan za 25. kolovoza, već je počeo pregovor sa 70 kompanijama u Europi. Sanirani otpad će biti odvezen izvan Hrvatske.
Bias read (Center): Čak iako se radi o politički kontroverznim temama poput otpada i vode, tekst ne pokazuje jasno slanje ka lijevoj ili desnoj strani. Informacije su predstavljene neutralno, bez evidentnog editorijalnog slanja. Ministar Bačić je dao detaljne objašnjenja i planove, ali bez evidentnog kritičkog ili podr
Why factuality (85): The article reports directly on statements made by Branko Bačić, including his reassurance about water quality based on HZJZ results. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the government is taking action and monitoring water quality. The information is presented as per official statements,
Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat reassuring but leans towards supporting the government's actions. There is an emphasis on the government's efforts and reassurances, which may reflect a more supportive stance toward the administration.
Gospićki gradonačelnik Darko Milinović je u intervjuu RTL Direktu oštro kritizirao hrvatsku vladu i premijera Andreja Plenkovića zbog sporog rješavanja problema opasnog otpada u regiji. Tvrdi da je vladajuća strana mogla pokrenuti izravni pregovarački postupak za sanaciju, ali je proces trajao više od godinu i pol, tokom kojeg nije odvezen ni jedan kilogram otpada. Milinović navodi da je grad već 2023. bio upozoren na odlaganje desetaka tisuća tona otpada, a građani su bili zabrinuti zbog kontaminacije vode. Kritizira i vladu za lažne objašnjenja i nedostatak akcije, tvrdeći da se problem može riješiti bez dodatnih propisa.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a strong critique of the government and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, using emotionally charged language such as 'lies' and 'disregard for citizens.' It emphasizes the failure of the central government to act swiftly on environmental issues, frames the government as negligent
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the content of the primary source document by quoting Darko Milinović’s criticisms of the government and Premier Plenković, including his claim that the government could have initiated direct negotiation procedures and that no waste was removed in 1.5 years. It also m
Why objectivity (65): The tone of the article leans towards criticism of the government and Premier Plenković, using strong language like 'oštro kritizirao Vladu' and emphasizing the frustration of citizens. While it presents the facts, it frames them in a way that supports Milinović’s perspective, potentially influencin
The cleanup of illegal waste at the PPK Velebit site in Gospić has entered a new phase, with the estimated cost of removing scattered waste near the silo increasing from 2.1 million to 4.72 million euros before VAT. The Environmental Protection Fund is seeking contractors for the removal of approximately 650 tons of waste in 'big bag' containers, while exploring options for handling buried waste abroad. The Ministry of Environment and Green Transition detailed the timeline of actions taken by both the ministry and the fund since the site was included in the Waste Management Plan in May last year. Despite efforts to attract bids through public tenders, no offers were received initially. Additional consultations with potential contractors revealed that the technical requirements and costs depend heavily on the composition of the waste, particularly chlorine content. Due to these findings, the estimated cost of the first phase of remediation increased significantly. A separate tender process has been initiated specifically for the removal of the 650 tons of non-hazardous waste in big bags, with an estimated value of 400,000 euros before VAT. The deadline for submitting bids in botht 1
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the situation regarding the illegal waste site, detailing the steps taken by the Ministry and the Environmental Protection Fund, the challenges faced in securing bids, and the financial implications. It does not exhibit clear bias towards any particular政治派
Why factuality (70): This article continues the discussion on the cost increase and challenges in finding contractors for the cleanup. It cites the Ministry's timeline and the legal basis for the Fund's involvement. While it includes additional details about the tender process and technical requirements, these are prese
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, though it emphasizes the urgency of the situation and the government's commitment to legal compliance. There is a slight leaning towards highlighting the complexity of the issue, but no clear political bias is evident.
Marija Selak Raspudić, članica parlamenta iz stranke Drito, govorila je na programu 'Novi dan' o problemima zagađenja voda i tla posljedičnim odlaganjem opasnog otpada u Gospiću. U razgovoru s Tihomirom Ladišićem, ističe političke posljedicе afere, posebno u vezi s predsjednikom Zoranom Milanovićem, za kojeg traži da prihvatite odgovornost umjesto da bude 'predsjednik fikusa'. Tema razgovora pokriva okolišne probleme i njihove političke implikacije.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikl naglašava kritiku prema Milanoviću, koristeći izraz 'predsjednik fikusa', što ukazuje na desnički slant. Međutim, autor koristi poziv na odgovornost kao poziv na lijevu stranu. Iako je izraz 'fikus' jasno desnički, kontekst razgovora i pitanje o odgovornosti sugerira lijevu poziciju. Kritika,
Why factuality (70): The article mentions Marija Selak Raspudić discussing water and soil contamination after the discovery of hazardous waste in Gospić but lacks specific details or direct quotes from her interview. This makes it less precise compared to the first article. It also doesn't provide enough information to
Why objectivity (55): The article appears biased toward the opposition viewpoint, focusing on the negative implications of the waste scandal without offering a balanced view of the government's position or any official responses. The tone suggests a critical stance toward the current administration without neutrality.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.