ON
← Back to feed
Why doctors waited 2 days to remove the bullet from Tiger Shroff firing victim
India🩺 HealthCenter4 hr. ago

Why doctors waited 2 days to remove the bullet from Tiger Shroff firing victim

Umesh Chauhan, a vlogger shot on October 18 outside actor Tiger Shroff’s residence in Mumbai, underwent surgery at KEM Hospital to remove a 1.5 cm bullet lodged in his body. Medical staff delayed the extraction for two days to monitor the patient for internal bleeding and potential damage to vital organs, specifically noting that the bullet had traveled through the chest region and injured areas near the liver. Dr. Uday Jadhav, head of the hospital’s cardiac surgery department, explained that the primary priority in such cases is stabilizing the patient and assessing the extent of internal trauma before determining the necessity of emergency intervention. The article notes that because Chauhan remained stable without ongoing critical bleeding, doctors opted for a monitored approach, which ultimately allowed for a smaller surgical incision during the two-hour procedure. The piece includes commentary from medical experts clarifying that bullets are not always removed immediately, as the risk of extraction can sometimes outweigh the benefits if the projectile is not causing active, life-threatening hemorrhage.

5 reports

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 80yesterday
Thought it was heart attack: Man shot while filming Tiger Shroff recounts ordeal

Umesh Chauhan, a man injured during an attack on Bollywood actor Tiger Shroff's vehicle in Mumbai, recounted his experience to India Today TV. He initially believed he was suffering from a heart attack due to severe chest pain and difficulty breathing after the incident. Chauhan was filming near the car's window when the attackers opened fire. He later discovered he had been shot and received medical attention at Cooper Hospital before being transferred to KEM Hospital for further treatment. Doctors confirmed the bullet did not damage his heart or lungs, and he remains stable under observation. Meanwhile, three suspects involved in the attack were arrested in Kota, Rajasthan, and are linked to the Lawrence Bishnoi gang through an alleged associate.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the incident involving a Bollywood actor and the subsequent arrest of suspects. It includes quotes from the victim and information from the hospital and police without apparent bias toward any political entity or ideology. There is no indication of loaded语言

Why factuality (80): The article gives a firsthand account of Umesh Chauhan's experience, which is valuable and corroborated by hospital statements. It includes specific medical details and the current status of the victim, aligning with other reports. However, it doesn't provide broader context about the attack itself

Why objectivity (80): The article is empathetic and presents the victim's account without editorializing. It maintains neutrality by quoting the hospital and the victim directly. However, the focus on the victim's personal story might give the impression of prioritizing human interest over the broader factual context of

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 95yesterday
3 Innovas, 3 Routes, 3 States: How Tiger Shroff's Shooters Were Brought To Mumbai

Actor Tiger Shroff was targeted by gunfire while driving in Mumbai's Juhu area. Three individuals suspected of being involved in the shooting were later arrested in Kota. The incident has raised concerns about security for celebrities and the circumstances surrounding the attack.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal incident involving a celebrity without taking a clear stance or showing bias toward any political entity or ideology. It focuses on the event itself rather than framing it within a political context.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (95): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing solely on the factual details of the arrests and their connection to the incident. No opinion or emotional language is present.

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 95yesterday
Identity Of Tiger Shroff's Shooter Still Unknown As Family Denies Link

Tiger Shroff, a well-known Bollywood actor, was shot at during an incident that occurred on a busy Sunday evening in Mumbai's upscale Juhu area. The event was recorded on video, but the identity of the shooter remains unknown. Shroff's family has denied any connection to the incident, indicating they are not involved in the circumstances surrounding the shooting. The situation continues to unfold as authorities investigate the case.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of the incident without apparent bias. It does not take a stance on the political implications or involve any political figures directly. The focus is on the event itself and the lack of information regarding the perpetrator.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone, presenting the facts without bias or emotional language. It clearly states that the investigation is ongoing and that full details are not yet available.

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenter4 hr. ago
Why doctors waited 2 days to remove the bullet from Tiger Shroff firing victim

Umesh Chauhan, a vlogger shot on October 18 outside actor Tiger Shroff’s residence in Mumbai, underwent surgery at KEM Hospital to remove a 1.5 cm bullet lodged in his body. Medical staff delayed the extraction for two days to monitor the patient for internal bleeding and potential damage to vital organs, specifically noting that the bullet had traveled through the chest region and injured areas near the liver. Dr. Uday Jadhav, head of the hospital’s cardiac surgery department, explained that the primary priority in such cases is stabilizing the patient and assessing the extent of internal trauma before determining the necessity of emergency intervention. The article notes that because Chauhan remained stable without ongoing critical bleeding, doctors opted for a monitored approach, which ultimately allowed for a smaller surgical incision during the two-hour procedure. The piece includes commentary from medical experts clarifying that bullets are not always removed immediately, as the risk of extraction can sometimes outweigh the benefits if the projectile is not causing active, life-threatening hemorrhage.

Bias read (Center): While the incident involves a high-profile celebrity and police action, the article focuses almost exclusively on the medical reasoning behind the treatment delay. It relies on expert medical explanations regarding trauma care protocols rather than political opinion or partisan framing, resulting in

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenter20 hr. ago
Bulletproof glass at Akshay Kumar’s home, security increased for Salman Khan

Following an attempted assassination against actor Tiger Shroff, heightened security measures have been implemented for several Bollywood celebrities, including Salman Khan and Akshay Kumar. According to reports, a prominent Bollywood figure was initially targeted by the attackers, though Shroff ended up being the victim. Salman Khan has received Y+ level security, while Akshay Kumar has installed bulletproof glass at his residence. Police patrols have also increased around the homes of Aamir Khan and Rohit Shetty. Meanwhile, Umesh Chauhan, the injured bystander shot during the incident, is preparing for surgery at KEM Hospital in Mumbai. Tiger Shroff's mother, Ayesha Shroff, visited Chauhan at the hospital and offered assistance to his family. Chauhan's wife, who is eight months pregnant, has been advised not to visit the hospital due to potential risks.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the security measures taken for Bollywood actors following an attack on Tiger Shroff. It includes information from multiple sources and presents both the actions taken by the celebrities and the condition of the injured individual, without apparent bias or煽

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories