ON
← Back to feed
Who do you trust in an emergency? Researchers ask people in places hit by extreme weather
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter14 hr. ago

Who do you trust in an emergency? Researchers ask people in places hit by extreme weather

In August 2025, a Pakistani shepherd named Abuzar Hussain saved hundreds of lives by using a mobile signal to warn his village of an approaching glacial flood, despite the area having significant investments in early warning systems. This incident highlights a broader issue identified by researchers: during emergencies, people often rely more on local informants than official sources. Researchers conducted surveys in Belgium, Germany, Poland, and Florida, regions affected by major weather disasters in 2024, to assess 'information voids' between what people expect from emergency alerts and what they actually receive. They found that while respondents believed they received sufficient information, the main issue lay in the credibility of the sources and the effectiveness of communication channels. The study aimed to quantify these gaps by measuring factors such as the accuracy of information, the reliability of sources, and the accessibility of communication methods.

Advertisement

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Phys.org logoPhys.orgIndependentCenter14 hr. ago
Who do you trust in an emergency? Researchers ask people in places hit by extreme weather

In August 2025, a Pakistani shepherd named Abuzar Hussain saved hundreds of lives by using a mobile signal to warn his village of an approaching glacial flood, despite the area having significant investments in early warning systems. This incident highlights a broader issue identified by researchers: during emergencies, people often rely more on local informants than official sources. Researchers conducted surveys in Belgium, Germany, Poland, and Florida, regions affected by major weather disasters in 2024, to assess 'information voids' between what people expect from emergency alerts and what they actually receive. They found that while respondents believed they received sufficient information, the main issue lay in the credibility of the sources and the effectiveness of communication channels. The study aimed to quantify these gaps by measuring factors such as the accuracy of information, the reliability of sources, and the accessibility of communication methods.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of how communities respond to emergencies, focusing on the role of both official and informal sources of information. While it acknowledges challenges in emergency communication, it does not take a clear ideological stance. The emphasis is on empirical data

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories