ON
← Back to feed
Vy calls Go-Ahead's ability historically poor
NO🏛️ Politicsyesterday

Vy calls Go-Ahead's ability historically poor

The article discusses concerns raised by Vy, a Norwegian railway operator, regarding the performance of Go-Ahead Norway on the Sørlandsbanen route. Vy criticizes Go-Ahead's service quality, citing issues such as poor punctuality, unreliable maintenance, and frequent train cancellations. They argue that since Go-Ahead took over six years ago, the situation has deteriorated significantly compared to when NSB operated the line. Go-Ahead's director, Emil Eike, acknowledges the challenges but emphasizes their commitment to improving service before handing over operations to Vy in December 2027. The article highlights ongoing disruptions, including record numbers of train cancellations and a decline in passenger numbers. Vy has written to the Railway Directorate expressing concerns about potential costs associated with taking over the services, though they admit these costs are beyond their control.

1 reports

NRK Nyheter logoNRK NyheterState / PublicLeftyesterday
Vy calls Go-Ahead's ability historically poor

The article discusses concerns raised by Vy, a Norwegian railway operator, regarding the performance of Go-Ahead Norway on the Sørlandsbanen route. Vy criticizes Go-Ahead's service quality, citing issues such as poor punctuality, unreliable maintenance, and frequent train cancellations. They argue that since Go-Ahead took over six years ago, the situation has deteriorated significantly compared to when NSB operated the line. Go-Ahead's director, Emil Eike, acknowledges the challenges but emphasizes their commitment to improving service before handing over operations to Vy in December 2027. The article highlights ongoing disruptions, including record numbers of train cancellations and a decline in passenger numbers. Vy has written to the Railway Directorate expressing concerns about potential costs associated with taking over the services, though they admit these costs are beyond their control.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue as a critique of Go-Ahead's management and operational failures, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often scrutinizes corporate accountability and public service delivery. While the subject is about a private railway operator, the tone suggests a broader关切

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories