Finance Minister Andrej Šircelj announced at the Capitals Markets 2026 conference in Zagreb that Slovenia plans to continue issuing people's bonds and implement measures to reduce costs for companies listing on stock exchanges. He emphasized the importance of capital markets for enhancing European competitiveness, highlighting the potential of activating uninvested savings by households. In Slovenia, nearly €33 billion is held in household deposits, but due to high inflation, Slovenians lose approximately €1 billion in purchasing power annually. Šircelj noted that Europe needs between €750–800 billion to boost competitiveness, which cannot be achieved through national budgets alone. The government has previously introduced measures to develop the capital market, including new issues of people’s bonds and proposals to increase limits on individual investment accounts. The minister also mentioned efforts to make it easier for innovative companies to access capital for expansion into foreign markets.
Finance Minister Andrej Šircelj announced at the Capital Markets 2026 conference in Zagreb that Slovenia will continue issuing individual government bonds and implement measures to reduce costs for companies listing on stock exchanges. He stated that inflation erodes approximately one billion euros of purchasing power annually from Slovenian household savings, which total nearly 33 billion euros in bank deposits. The minister proposed doubling the maximum allowed contributions to individual investment accounts, aiming to channel these funds into long-term investments to support economic growth. The conference, organized by the Slovenian media house Delo and the Croatian media house Hanza Media, took place on October 20 in Zagreb. The theme focused on strengthening Europe’s financial strength and competitiveness. Croatian Finance Minister Tomislav Ćorić and Slovenian Finance Minister Andrej Šircelj delivered keynote addresses. Ana Hanžeković Krznarić, president of the board of Hanza Media, welcomed the attendees. The two ministers also held a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the event. Šircelj highlighted that 87 percent of Slovenian bank deposits are demand deposits, a share roughly 30 percentage points higher than the European Union average. He argued that this high proportion of liquid savings represents missed opportunities for innovation and expansion. According to the minister, if ten percent of these demand deposits were directed toward long-term investments, it would provide nearly three billion euros for development. This capital is needed by innovative companies seeking to expand into foreign markets and develop new technologies. The minister cited a report by Mario Draghi, which estimated that Europe requires between 750 and 800 billion euros in additional investment to become more competitive. This amount equates to approximately 4.5 percent of gross domestic product. Šircelj noted that no single European country can fund this through its national budget alone, asserting that only private capital can bridge this gap. He pointed out that Europe lags behind other regions in both economic growth and research and development spending. The International Monetary Fund projects global economic growth of 3.1 percent this year, with Europe growing at just 1.1 percent. In comparison, China is projected to grow by 4.5 percent and the United States by 2.3 percent. Regarding research and development expenditure, the European Union allocates 2.24 percent of GDP, compared to 3.45 percent in the US and 2.58 percent in China. To address these challenges, the Ministry of Finance has proposed increasing the limit for individual investment accounts. Currently, the cap is 17,000 euros. The proposal suggests raising this to 40,000 euros in the first year and 20,000 euros in each subsequent year, with a cumulative limit of 300,000 euros. Šircelj indicated that the government might further modify or even remove these limits entirely, similar to practices in some other countries. He mentioned that Croatia does not intend to tax returns on such investment accounts, a policy he described as worthy of consideration, though Slovenia currently maintains its existing taxation regime. The minister emphasized the need for the state to borrow on the domestic market rather than relying primarily on large financial institutions in the European market. He promised continued and increased issuance of individual bonds to facilitate this shift. Additionally, he outlined plans to make it easier for companies, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, to enter the stock exchange. Current listing processes involve high regulatory burdens and administrative costs, which act as barriers to entry. The previous government had planned co-financing mechanisms for corporate bond issuances and listings, a path the current administration intends to pursue. Benjamin Jošar, chairman of the board of Triglav Investments, spoke at the conference about the structural differences between European and American economies. He described the European economy as one of the present, while characterizing the American and Chinese economies as ones of the future. Jošar argued that Europe possesses ample resources, including population size and knowledge, yet fails to translate them into competitive advantage due to fragmented capital markets. He stressed that startup financing relies heavily on capital markets rather than banks, and that establishing a unified European capital market is essential. However, he warned that this measure alone is insufficient without removing internal trade barriers, which the International Monetary Fund estimates have effects comparable to high tariffs, particularly in financial services. Maja Bešević Vlajo, chairman of the board of UniCredit Invest, noted that European bank deposits exceed ten trillion euros. She observed that these funds do not find efficient pathways to businesses requiring capital for development. She called for better integration between banks, capital markets, and companies, arguing that banks cannot solely finance risky developmental projects. She urged European policymakers to adopt a more optimistic approach and focus on creating conditions for company growth rather than merely discussing obstacles. Tomasz Bardziłowski, chairman of the Warsaw Stock Exchange, pointed out that Central European countries represent 11 percent of the EU's GDP but only 3 percent of its market capitalization. He cited Sweden as a successful example, noting that Swedish pension funds have driven over 500 initial public offerings in the last decade. In Sweden, only 15 percent of savings are held in deposits, whereas the regional average is around 40 percent and Poland’s is 50 percent. Bardžilowski advised building local ecosystems involving pension funds, venture capital, and private equity to attract institutional investors before engaging foreign capital. Marko Bombač, chairman of the Ljubljana Stock Exchange, emphasized that companies seek capital where it is available at fair prices. If domestic markets fail to provide adequate funding, companies will look abroad, typically to the United States. While competition forces efficiency, Bombač warned that this often leads to the relocation of headquarters, strategic decision-making, research and development, intellectual property, and key jobs overseas. He argued that providing competitive capital domestically is crucial to retaining these assets within Europe. Ivana Gažić, chairman of the Zagreb Stock Exchange, expressed optimism regarding the adoption of investment accounts in Poland and their upcoming introduction in Croatia. She noted that earlier adopters like Sweden, Norway, and France created broad investor bases, encouraging individuals to prepare financially for retirement beyond reliance on state pension systems. She highlighted that Croatian capital markets have recently gained political attention after years of neglect.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article discusses Slovenia's economic challenges related to inflation eroding savings, despite high levels of household deposits. Finance Minister Andrej Šircelj highlighted the need to redirect these savings into long-term investments to support innovation and economic growth. He emphasized the importance of capital markets in enhancing Europe’s competitiveness and noted that European countries allocate significantly less of their GDP to research and development compared to the U.S. and China. The article mentions a conference in Zagreb focused on strengthening financial power and regional competitiveness, attended by Slovenian and Croatian finance ministers.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of economic policy proposals and challenges without overtly favoring any particular ideological stance. It includes quotes from the finance minister and references broader economic data without biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (90): The article provides accurate information about the conference, including the participation of Slovenian and Croatian ministers, the focus on capital markets, and the mention of savings lost due to inflation. It aligns closely with the primary document's content.
Why objectivity (75): While generally neutral, the article emphasizes the importance of capital markets for competitiveness and mentions the potential benefits of activating savings. It maintains a balanced tone but could have included more perspectives on challenges or limitations of these proposals.
Finance Minister Andrej Šircelj announced at the Capitals Markets 2026 conference in Zagreb that Slovenia plans to continue issuing people's bonds and implement measures to reduce costs for companies listing on stock exchanges. He emphasized the importance of capital markets for enhancing European competitiveness, highlighting the potential of activating uninvested savings by households. In Slovenia, nearly €33 billion is held in household deposits, but due to high inflation, Slovenians lose approximately €1 billion in purchasing power annually. Šircelj noted that Europe needs between €750–800 billion to boost competitiveness, which cannot be achieved through national budgets alone. The government has previously introduced measures to develop the capital market, including new issues of people’s bonds and proposals to increase limits on individual investment accounts. The minister also mentioned efforts to make it easier for innovative companies to access capital for expansion into foreign markets.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of economic policies proposed by the Finance Minister, focusing on technical aspects of financial instruments and their implications for competitiveness. There is no overtly biased language, and the framing remains neutral, emphasizing data and policy goals.
Why factuality (88): The article accurately conveys the economic situation described at the conference, including the loss of purchasing power due to inflation and the need for increased investment. It references the primary document's points about the size of savings and the gap between Europe and the US.
Why objectivity (70): The article leans slightly towards emphasizing the urgency of financial reform in Europe while acknowledging the challenges. It avoids overt bias but could have presented counterarguments or alternative solutions to maintain perfect neutrality.
The article discusses concerns raised by Benjamin Jošar at the 'Kapitalski trgi 2026' conference in Zagreb regarding Europe's economic challenges compared to the United States and China. Jošar argues that while Europe has resources like capital, knowledge, and population, it lags behind due to structural issues such as fragmented financial markets and regulatory barriers. He emphasizes that America's advantage lies in its unified capital market, which supports innovation and startup growth, whereas Europe struggles with national divisions and inefficiencies. Jošar highlights that simply creating a unified European capital market won't solve the problem unless there is genuine economic integration. The discussion also includes insights from Maja Bešević Vlajo, who notes that Europe holds over ten billion euros in bank deposits but lacks effective channels to channel this into productive investment.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between the current state of the European economy and the future-oriented strategies of the US and China. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. Instead, it reports on perspectives shared during a conference, and
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the main themes from the conference, including the comparison between Europe and the US, the role of institutional capital, and the focus on Slovenia and Croatia. However, it omits specific details from the primary document such as the exact date (October 20, 2026), lo
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'gospodarstvo sedanjosti' (economy of the present) and frames Europe as lagging behind the US and China. It presents a biased perspective favoring the need for European transformation without adequately representing opposing viewpoints.
The article discusses the development of investment markets in Slovenia, Croatia, and Poland, emphasizing the need for increased domestic investment to compete globally. Representatives from the Zagreb Stock Exchange and Warsaw Stock Exchange highlight the importance of building strong capital markets, drawing inspiration from Sweden’s success in creating a robust investment environment. They note that Slovenia, like Croatia and Poland, has relatively low levels of private savings compared to other European countries and stress the need for institutional investments, pension funds, and venture capital ecosystems to support local businesses and attract foreign investors.
Bias read (Center): The article presents viewpoints from financial institutions and officials discussing economic strategies and market development. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing favoring any particular political stance. The content remains focused on economic policy
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the conference and highlights the need for stronger capital markets in Europe. However, it lacks detailed information about the event itself, such as the date, location, and specific topics covered in the primary document.
Why objectivity (60): The article exhibits a strong bias toward the need for European economic reform and presents a one-sided argument. It does not provide a balanced analysis of the issues discussed at the conference.
The article discusses economic growth in Slovenia, noting that while the economy continues to accelerate, energy prices are once again contributing to inflation. The piece highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing economic expansion with rising costs related to energy, which impacts overall price levels.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of economic performance and inflationary pressures without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It focuses on economic indicators and does not include explicit ideological framing or biased language.
Why factuality (0): This article is incomplete and does not provide any relevant information about the conference or its discussions. It appears to be an advertisement or subscription page rather than a news article.
Why objectivity (0): The article fails to provide any objective analysis or reporting on the event. It is clearly designed to promote subscriptions rather than inform readers about the conference.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
