A fire, possibly caused by human action, has burned through 37 hectares in the Devesa del Saler area, marking it as the worst fire in the history of the Natural Park. This surpasses the previous major fire in 1986, which destroyed 35 hectares. While preventive measures such as 11 water cannons have been installed in recent years, other actions aimed at reducing fire risk, like applying fire-retardant products in strategic areas, were abandoned this summer. The initiative was initially announced by the local council’s Devesa department, led by Vox spokesperson José Gosálbez, as a pilot project in May of last year. It involved covering 13,000 square meters with 32,500 liters of product, applied via mobile water tankers and manually in hard-to-reach areas. However, the department confirmed they decided not to repeat the operation, calling it a 'pilot test.'
Bias read (Conservative): The article highlights the decision by Vox, a right-wing party, to abandon a fire prevention measure they had previously promoted. The framing emphasizes the pilot nature of the program and the lack of repetition, potentially implying criticism of the approach or its effectiveness. The tone appears
Why factuality (75): The article reports on an ongoing wildfire in the Devesa del Saler, stating it has burned 37 hectares and is the worst in the park’s history. It mentions the installation of 11 water cannons as a preventive measure but notes they have stopped being used. The article also discusses the Vox-led munici
Why objectivity (65): The article presents information from multiple sources, including official statements from the Vox-led municipality and local authorities. While it remains neutral in tone overall, there is a slight bias toward highlighting the political implications of the decision not to apply fire-retardants, par


