The article reports that the High Court of Offenses confirmed that Miro Bulj was correct in his decision to refuse implementing COVID certificates in the city administration of Sinj during the pandemic. This ruling supports Bulj’s stance that he legally protected equality and dignity of all citizens by refusing to enforce discriminatory measures. The article highlights that this decision came after over four years and aligns with claims made by the Most party, which asserts that local authorities like Bulj resisted the policies imposed by figures such as Andrej Plenković, Vili Beroš, Davor Božinović, and the Civil Protection Service, which they claim divided citizens into 'compliant' and 'non-compliant' groups. The article emphasizes that the court ruled the accusations against Bulj were not legally justified and lacked essential elements of a violation, indicating that the State Inspectorate acted without proper legal basis. It concludes by calling for accountability from those who enforced these policies and suggests that the ruling serves as validation for citizens who opposed the restrictions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as a struggle between local officials resisting politically motivated discrimination and national authorities enforcing restrictive policies. It portrays the state inspectorate and figures like Plenković as acting beyond legal justification, implying a broader pattern






