ON
← Back to feed
The High Criminal Court has confirmed that Bully during the Covid pandemic was right
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives5 hr. ago

The High Criminal Court has confirmed that Bully during the Covid pandemic was right

The article reports that the High Court of Offenses confirmed that Miro Bulj was correct in his decision to refuse implementing COVID certificates in the city administration of Sinj during the pandemic. This ruling supports Bulj’s stance that he legally protected equality and dignity of all citizens by refusing to enforce discriminatory measures. The article highlights that this decision came after over four years and aligns with claims made by the Most party, which asserts that local authorities like Bulj resisted the policies imposed by figures such as Andrej Plenković, Vili Beroš, Davor Božinović, and the Civil Protection Service, which they claim divided citizens into 'compliant' and 'non-compliant' groups. The article emphasizes that the court ruled the accusations against Bulj were not legally justified and lacked essential elements of a violation, indicating that the State Inspectorate acted without proper legal basis. It concludes by calling for accountability from those who enforced these policies and suggests that the ruling serves as validation for citizens who opposed the restrictions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

Net.hr logoNet.hrIndependentProgressive5 hr. ago
The High Criminal Court has confirmed that Bully during the Covid pandemic was right

The article reports that the High Court of Offenses confirmed that Miro Bulj was correct in his decision to refuse implementing COVID certificates in the city administration of Sinj during the pandemic. This ruling supports Bulj’s stance that he legally protected equality and dignity of all citizens by refusing to enforce discriminatory measures. The article highlights that this decision came after over four years and aligns with claims made by the Most party, which asserts that local authorities like Bulj resisted the policies imposed by figures such as Andrej Plenković, Vili Beroš, Davor Božinović, and the Civil Protection Service, which they claim divided citizens into 'compliant' and 'non-compliant' groups. The article emphasizes that the court ruled the accusations against Bulj were not legally justified and lacked essential elements of a violation, indicating that the State Inspectorate acted without proper legal basis. It concludes by calling for accountability from those who enforced these policies and suggests that the ruling serves as validation for citizens who opposed the restrictions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as a struggle between local officials resisting politically motivated discrimination and national authorities enforcing restrictive policies. It portrays the state inspectorate and figures like Plenković as acting beyond legal justification, implying a broader pattern

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressive5 hr. ago
Bridge: High Criminal Court confirms that Bulj was right about COVID certificates

The article reports that the High Court of Offenses has confirmed that Miro Bulj was correct in his refusal to implement COVID certificates in the city administration of Sinj. This decision, which took over four years to reach, validates Bulj's stance that he was protecting the equality and dignity of all citizens by refusing to enforce discriminatory measures. The article frames this as a victory against political pressure and abuse of state power, highlighting that the State Inspectorate lacked legal grounds for its accusations against Bulj. It also criticizes former leaders like Andrej Plenković, Vili Beroš, Davor Božinović, and the Civil Protection Service for enforcing divisive policies during the pandemic. The article concludes by questioning whether these officials will acknowledge their wrongdoing and apologize to the citizens who were marginalized.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Miro Bulj's actions as a principled stand against discrimination and political overreach, while criticizing the ruling elite for implementing policies that divided citizens. The tone suggests support for Bulj and skepticism toward the political figures accused of abusing state权力

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressive5 hr. ago
Bridge: High Criminal Court confirms that Bulj was right about the covid certificates

The article reports that the High Administrative Court in Croatia confirmed that Miri Bulj was correct in his refusal to implement COVID certificates in the city administration of Sinj. This decision, which took over four years, supports Bulj’s stance that he was protecting the equality and dignity of all citizens by refusing to enforce discriminatory measures. The ruling states that the State Inspectorate’s allegations against Bulj were legally unfounded and lacked essential elements of a violation. The article frames the case as a victory against political pressure and abuse of state power, suggesting that the ruling confirms that Bulj acted lawfully and in defense of civil rights. It also criticizes former officials, including Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and others associated with the Civil Protection Agency, for enforcing policies that divided citizens based on health status.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the court's ruling in favor of Miri Bulj as a significant legal and moral victory against political interference and discrimination. It frames the case as a broader struggle against authoritarian governance and the misuse of state authority. The tone emphasizes the legitimacy of

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories