ON
← Back to feed
More than 40,000 defective condoms sold online and in pharmacies: Buyers at risk of infection and pregnancy
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

More than 40,000 defective condoms sold online and in pharmacies: Buyers at risk of infection and pregnancy

An investigation by French authorities has identified over 40,000 non-compliant condoms sold online and in pharmacies, including brands such as Friday Bae, Okamoto, Sagami, and My Lubie. These products failed to meet EU safety standards, lacked proper labeling in French, or had defects like rupture risks. The DGCCRF and DGS reported that around 10,000 packages were sold online, primarily through Asian distributors, while some were available in stores and pharmacies. Two products with CE markings were still found to be non-compliant. The Ministry of Health has initiated recalls, affecting approximately 260,000 units. Authorities warn users of increased risk of STIs and unintended pregnancy, advising testing and urging internet platforms to remove suspicious listings.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 887 days ago
French authorities have warned that tens of thousands of condoms are potentially defective and at risk of bursting.

Francuske državne agencije, DGCCRF i DGS, upozorile su na desetke tisuća kondoma koji mogu biti neispravni i imati rizik od pucanja ili perforacija. Preko 260.000 kondoma bilo je povučeno iz prodaje nakon laboratorijskih testova. Agencije su također pronašle 30 linija kondoma na internetu bez potrebnih oznaka. Od tih, već je prodano oko 40.000 kondoma. Proizvođači su uklonili proizvode iz ponude, a upozorenje se odnosi na marke od japanske tvrtke Okamoto Industries, te na marke My Lubie i Friday Bae tvrtke Passage du Desir.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding a health safety issue involving condoms, without taking a political stance. It reports on actions taken by French governmental agencies and does not frame the issue in a politically charged manner. The focus is on public health and regulatory action

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the recall of over 260,000 condoms and aligns closely with the primary source document from Euronews. It mentions the brands affected, the risk of bursting and perforations, and advises users to get STI tests and pregnancy tests. However, it omits specific details like

Why objectivity (88): The tone remains informative and advisory, focusing on public health concerns. While it presents the facts clearly, it uses slightly emotive language such as 'potencijalno neispravno' (potentially defective) which could be seen as slightly alarmist, though still within reasonable bounds.

Net.hr logoNet.hrIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 877 days ago
260,000 condoms were recalled from pharmacies, and more than 40,000 defective condoms were sold to customers.

French anti-fraud agency DGCCRF and health agency DGS have warned about thousands of potentially defective condoms being sold online, in stores, and pharmacies. Over 260,000 condoms distributed by pharmacies and stores were recalled after lab tests identified two products as posing a risk of rupture or perforation. Consumers advised to get tested for sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy if their period is missed. The agencies also found 30 lines of condoms lacking EU conformity markings or French labeling on online platforms. Around 40,000 units from these brands, produced by Japanese company Okamoto Industries and brands My Lubie and Friday Bae from Passage du Desir, have already been sold. Platforms agreed to remove these products from sale.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a product recall involving condoms, focusing on regulatory actions taken by French authorities. It does not take a partisan stance, nor does it emphasize any particular political group or ideology. The framing remains neutral, providing balanced context

Why factuality (93): The article accurately reflects the recall numbers, the brands involved, and the reasons for the recall. It matches the primary source in detailing the 40,000 condoms sold online and the 260,000 recalled. It also includes the recommendation for STI and pregnancy tests.

Why objectivity (87): The tone is informative and advisory, similar to the others. It avoids strong emotional language but does use phrases like 'neispravnih kondoma' (defective condoms) which could be seen as slightly biased towards concern rather than neutrality.

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 857 days ago
More than 40,000 defective condoms sold online and in pharmacies: Buyers at risk of infection and pregnancy

An investigation by French authorities has identified over 40,000 non-compliant condoms sold online and in pharmacies, including brands such as Friday Bae, Okamoto, Sagami, and My Lubie. These products failed to meet EU safety standards, lacked proper labeling in French, or had defects like rupture risks. The DGCCRF and DGS reported that around 10,000 packages were sold online, primarily through Asian distributors, while some were available in stores and pharmacies. Two products with CE markings were still found to be non-compliant. The Ministry of Health has initiated recalls, affecting approximately 260,000 units. Authorities warn users of increased risk of STIs and unintended pregnancy, advising testing and urging internet platforms to remove suspicious listings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information from French regulatory agencies without overt ideological framing. It reports on a public health concern without taking sides, focusing on the actions of authorities and the need for consumer caution. While the issue involves government regulation, the tone,措

Why factuality (92): This article provides accurate figures and aligns well with the primary source, mentioning the brands, the number of condoms recalled, and the testing process. It includes the CE marking issue and the advice for users. Minor discrepancies include the phrasing of dates and slight variations in brand

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone but uses more dramatic language such as 'rizik od zaraze i trudnoće' (risk of infection and pregnancy) which could be interpreted as sensationalizing the situation, even though it's intended to raise awareness.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories