VIDEO Stanković recalled the greatest shame: 'I almost got fired because of this guest'

Jutarnji listIndependentCenter2 hr. ago

Aleksandar Stanković, urednik emisije 'Nedjeljom u 2', priznao je da je najveći propust u karijeri nastao zbog pogrešne najave gosta Davora Mihajlovića, koji je bio predstavljen kao imajući četiri doktorata, što nije bilo točno. Ova greška, koja je nastala iz nenamjerne pogreške, dovela je do velike reakcije publike i smanjenja plati za Stankovića za 30 posto. Nakon što je otkrivena laž, Stanković je izrazio žalost i ispričao se, ali nije se ispričao zbog izjava gosta, jer smatra da je on rekao

Bias read (Center): The article discusses a professional mistake made by a TV producer, which led to public backlash and financial loss. While the incident involves public figures and media, it does not directly involve political parties, policies, or governance. The framing focuses on the personal accountability of an

Večernji listIndependentCenter2 hr. ago

In a video from the series 'Legendarne Nedjeljom u 2', TV host Aleksandar Stanković reflects on a major professional mistake from 2012. During an episode, he invited Darko Mihajlović, whom he presented as a renowned economist with four doctorates. However, shortly after the broadcast, it was revealed that Mihajlović had no academic degrees and was actually a bookkeeper with basic qualifications. Mihajlović later admitted he never claimed to have those credentials. The incident led to calls for Stanković’s dismissal and a 30% pay cut for the month. Despite this, Stanković defended the content of the interview, acknowledging that Mihajlović made valid points. The incident has sparked public discussion, with some viewing it as a humorous moment and others criticizing the lack of due diligence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the incident, focusing on the factual outcome rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the event involved a controversial figure (Mihajlović), the narrative does not frame the issue through a political lens. Instead, it emphasizes the personal,