ON
← Back to feed
[Video] RTV over social networks because politicians don't need them anymore
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives10 days ago

[Video] RTV over social networks because politicians don't need them anymore

The article discusses how traditional media outlets like RTV Slovenia are losing influence as politicians increasingly use social media to communicate directly with the public, bypassing journalists and editors. RTV has attempted to address this by highlighting examples of politicians using platforms such as YouTube to share self-promotional videos and comment on current issues, often avoiding uncomfortable questions from reporters. The piece critiques RTV’s perceived failure to adapt, noting that while they criticize politicians for using social media, they have not similarly scrutinized figures like Robert Golob, who actively uses these platforms. The article suggests that traditional media has lost its gatekeeping role, allowing politicians to reach audiences independently.

RTV Slovenia has launched a campaign targeting social media platforms, arguing that politicians no longer need traditional media channels. The initiative, which includes a video release, highlights the growing influence of social networks in political communication. According to reports, RTV claims that politicians can now directly reach the public through these platforms, bypassing the need for editors, journalists, or television programs altogether. This shift reflects a broader trend in how political messaging is distributed and consumed, with social media becoming a primary tool for direct engagement. The video, released by RTV Slovenia, showcases several examples of politicians using social media to communicate with their audiences. Among them are Zoran Stevanović, Anže Logar, and Jernej Vrtavec. Logar stated in one of the videos, “Skok will deal with this type of crime so that those who committed it will also answer,” while Vrtavec claimed, “I will try my best to resolve the current situation and quickly restore traffic on the motorway junction.” These statements were edited and combined with excerpts from interviews between politicians and RTV journalists, aiming to illustrate how “unpleasant questions” are posed during traditional media interactions. Despite these efforts, the video does not address the case of Robert Golob, a prominent politician who frequently uses social media to share his views and political messages. Unlike others, Golob’s approach has not been portrayed as problematic by RTV. He regularly engages with the public directly, posting his statements and responding to issues in real time, often avoiding the scrutiny of journalists. This contrast suggests that not all politicians are equally affected by the rise of social media, and some continue to leverage these platforms effectively without facing criticism. Traditional media, including RTV Slovenia, once played a central role in shaping public discourse. They acted as gatekeepers, deciding which information reached the audience and how it was presented. However, the emergence of social media has disrupted this model. Politicians can now bypass these intermediaries, reaching millions of viewers instantly. This change has led to a decline in the authority of traditional media, as they lose control over the narrative and the flow of information. The impact of this shift is evident in the statistics. According to data cited by RTV Slovenia, the TV Dnevnik, a popular news program, averaged around 10.5% viewer minutes per episode in the first quarter of 2026, with approximately 199,700 viewers. In contrast, individual political videos on Facebook and other platforms have amassed significantly higher numbers, with some accumulating over 150,000 views within days or weeks. This disparity underscores the changing landscape of political communication, where social media offers greater reach and immediacy than traditional broadcasting. Analysts suggest that the ability of politicians to engage directly with the public through social media has fundamentally altered the dynamics of political discourse. With the power to shape narratives independently, politicians are no longer reliant on traditional media to convey their messages. This evolution challenges the long-standing role of institutions like RTV Slovenia, which must now navigate a rapidly evolving media environment. As digital platforms continue to grow in influence, the relevance of traditional media will likely remain a topic of ongoing debate.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7013 days ago
[Video] RTV over social networks because politicians don't need them anymore

The article discusses how traditional media outlets like RTV Slovenia are losing influence as politicians increasingly use social media to communicate directly with the public, bypassing journalists and editors. RTV has attempted to address this by highlighting examples of politicians using platforms such as YouTube to share self-promotional videos and comment on current issues, often avoiding uncomfortable questions from reporters. The piece critiques RTV’s perceived failure to adapt, noting that while they criticize politicians for using social media, they have not similarly scrutinized figures like Robert Golob, who actively uses these platforms. The article suggests that traditional media has lost its gatekeeping role, allowing politicians to reach audiences independently.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames traditional media as outdated and ineffective, criticizing their loss of control over information dissemination. It highlights the shift toward direct communication by politicians through social media, which is portrayed as empowering citizens but undermining traditional media's '

Why factuality (85): The article reports on RTV Slovenia's response to politicians using social media directly, citing examples like Zorán Stevanović, Anže Logar, and Jernej Vrtovč. It references specific quotes from these politicians and describes how RTV edited their statements. While no primary source is available, t

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly towards criticizing politicians who bypass traditional media, suggesting they avoid difficult questions. While not overtly biased, the framing implies that RTV's role is being undermined by direct political communication, which introduces some editorial perspective.

Požareport logoPožareportIndependentProgressiveFactual 45Objective 3010 days ago
It's not Logar's butter, it's Han's butter.

The article discusses various topics related to Slovenian politics and media, including allegations against members of the Golob family regarding their absence from work and potential misuse of public funds. It references social media posts and comments from multiple accounts, including those of journalists and politicians. The article also mentions ongoing labor disputes at RTV Slovenia, with calls for strikes and resistance against the government. Additionally, it touches upon new TV programs and other unrelated news snippets, such as a reference to a Japanese author and a mention of a purchase of the Los Angeles Lakers by a businessman connected to Donald Trump's family.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discussion around alleged misuse of public funds by high-profile individuals and criticizes government actions, particularly referencing calls for strikes and resistance against the ruling party. The tone suggests skepticism toward certain officials and highlights labor rights

Why factuality (45): The article contains vague and unsubstantiated claims about family members taking time off, but no specific facts are presented or sourced. The references to individuals like Golob and Gabrova are not clearly supported by evidence, and the connection to 'Hanovo maslo' is unclear. There is little con

Why objectivity (30): The tone is highly biased and opinionated, using phrases like 'how stupid, really bright and repetitive these posts are.' It includes personal commentary and appears to take sides rather than presenting an objective account of events.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories