ON
← Back to feed
A new controversy in HNL, see why Hajduk asked for a penalty in moments of drama
Croatia⚽ Sports7 days ago

A new controversy in HNL, see why Hajduk asked for a penalty in moments of drama

In a dramatic final moments of their match against Gorica, Hajduk sought a penalty after a challenge between Jakov Filipović and Rokas Pukštas in the 81st minute, but referee Patrik Pavlešić and VAR did not award the penalty. The incident occurred when Pukštas fell inside the penalty area after contact with Filipović, and Hajduk players immediately protested. However, the officiating team determined there were insufficient elements to justify the most severe punishment. This situation sparked strong reactions among Hajduk fans, especially since Gorica had just equalized through a penalty scored by Bruno Bogojević minutes earlier. Despite the controversy, Hajduk eventually won the match 2:1 in the 87th minute when Marko Livaja scored from within the penalty area.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 507 days ago
A new controversy in HNL, see why Hajduk asked for a penalty in moments of drama

In a dramatic final moments of their match against Gorica, Hajduk sought a penalty after a challenge between Jakov Filipović and Rokas Pukštas in the 81st minute, but referee Patrik Pavlešić and VAR did not award the penalty. The incident occurred when Pukštas fell inside the penalty area after contact with Filipović, and Hajduk players immediately protested. However, the officiating team determined there were insufficient elements to justify the most severe punishment. This situation sparked strong reactions among Hajduk fans, especially since Gorica had just equalized through a penalty scored by Bruno Bogojević minutes earlier. Despite the controversy, Hajduk eventually won the match 2:1 in the 87th minute when Marko Livaja scored from within the penalty area.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event with no explicit political content or framing. It focuses solely on the match outcome, player actions, and referee decisions without any ideological or political commentary.

Why factuality (30): This article discusses a controversial penalty decision during the Hajduk vs. Gorica match. It references the VAR and referee decisions but does not mention Tihomir Pejin or the incident from the primary source document. Content is unrelated to the main event.

Why objectivity (50): The tone leans slightly toward supporting the fans' frustration over the penalty decision, showing mild bias. However, it remains focused on the game itself without overt emotional language.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories