ON
← Back to feed
Firefighter accused of threatening Ranka Ostojic: "Malj is ready and sharp"
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter16 hr. ago

Firefighter accused of threatening Ranka Ostojic: "Malj is ready and sharp"

A professional firefighter from the Public Fire Department in Imotski has been charged with threatening SDP MP Ranko Ostojić after commenting on his Facebook post about the Jasenovac concentration camp. The charge was filed by the municipal state prosecutor’s office in Split. According to the indictment, the firefighter posted a message on April 23rd criticizing Ostojić's post, which commemorated the 81st anniversary of the Jasenovac uprising. The message included threats such as 'Malj je spreman i naoštren' (He is ready and sharpened). The prosecutor’s office recommended a conditional prison sentence of ten months with a three-year probation period. The firefighter denies the allegations, stating he did not commit a criminal act and that the language used against him is inaccurate.

A professional firefighter with the Public Fire Department in Imotski has been charged with threatening a member of parliament from the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Ranko Ostojić, according to the municipal state prosecutor’s office in Split. The charge was filed following a social media comment made by the firefighter on April 23, in which he allegedly threatened Ostojić after responding to a post about the 81st anniversary of the Jasenovac uprising. The prosecutor's office alleges that the firefighter posted a message on Facebook criticizing Ostojić’s comments on the historical event. The message reportedly read: “It’s a shame you weren’t among them, the air would have been much cleaner. Go there, idiots, if you don’t go soon, believe me, you’ll soon be gone. Malj is ready and sharpened. Is your mother still alive?” The term “malj” is a colloquial expression often used to refer to a child or someone young, though its exact meaning can vary depending on context. The state prosecutor’s office has recommended that the court issue a criminal order against the firefighter, proposing conditional imprisonment for ten months with a three-year probation period. If the case proceeds to trial, the prosecution suggests that the court should impose the same sentence with a three-year review period. In response to the charges, the firefighter has denied wrongdoing and claims that he did not commit a criminal act. He also asserts that the language attributed to him in the indictment does not reflect his actual statements or intentions. According to his defense, the words used against him are not representative of his character or conduct. The controversy arose after Ostojić published a statement commemorating the 81st anniversary of the Jasenovac uprising. In the post, Ostojić described the event as a moment when approximately 670 prisoners, many suffering from illness or weakness, attempted to break out of the Jasenovac concentration camp. Only 89 of them succeeded in escaping. Those who were unable to participate in the breakout were executed and burned along with the camp structures. Ostojić noted that over 83,000 people were killed in the Jasenovac camp, a number he compared to the population of the city of Zadar. Ostojić’s post highlighted the tragic outcome of the uprising, emphasizing the loss of life during the attempt to escape the camp. His remarks sparked a public reaction, leading to the firefighter’s online response. The incident has raised questions about freedom of speech and the boundaries of acceptable discourse, particularly regarding sensitive historical topics. The case highlights the potential consequences of using inflammatory language in public forums, even when discussing historical events. While the firefighter denies making threats, the legal proceedings will determine whether his actions constitute a violation of the law. The court will assess the nature of the communication and its implications under Croatian criminal law. As the legal process unfolds, both sides will present their arguments. The prosecution will argue that the firefighter’s comments crossed into the realm of harassment or intimidation, while the defendant will maintain that his words were misunderstood or taken out of context. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how such disputes are handled in future instances involving public figures and historical narratives.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8516 hr. ago
Firefighter accused of threatening Ranka Ostojic: "Malj is ready and sharp"

A professional firefighter from the Public Fire Department in Imotski has been charged with threatening SDP MP Ranko Ostojić after commenting on his Facebook post about the Jasenovac concentration camp. The charge was filed by the municipal state prosecutor’s office in Split. According to the indictment, the firefighter posted a message on April 23rd criticizing Ostojić's post, which commemorated the 81st anniversary of the Jasenovac uprising. The message included threats such as 'Malj je spreman i naoštren' (He is ready and sharpened). The prosecutor’s office recommended a conditional prison sentence of ten months with a three-year probation period. The firefighter denies the allegations, stating he did not commit a criminal act and that the language used against him is inaccurate.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal charges against the firefighter in a factual manner, quoting both the indictment and the firefighter's defense. It does not take a clear ideological stance toward either the accused or the politician involved, maintaining neutrality in framing the issue. While the case

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the charges against the firefighter based on the primary source document from Dalmatinski portal. It includes the exact quote from the firefighter, the date of the incident, and the proposed sentence by the state prosecutor. The article also provides context about Osto

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the facts neutrally but uses emotionally charged language such as 'prijetio' (threatened) and 'sporan i naoštren' (prepared and sharpened), which may imply judgment. It also frames the situation as a legal matter without clearly distinguishing between the facts and the subjectiv

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories