In the judicial and prosecutorial ranks critical of the Jump Act: This will not contribute to more effective prosecution of crimes

Nova24TVParty-alignedProgressive3 hr. ago

The article discusses criticism of a new law aimed at improving cooperation between institutions combating organized crime and corruption, which has been challenged by the General State Prosecutor, Katarina Bergant. She argues that the law undermines the professional autonomy of the prosecution service and increases political influence. Meanwhile, some members of the public believe necessary changes are needed in criminal investigations. The article references past experiences, including incidents where transitional leftist actors allegedly promoted their services within corrupt systems, and revelations in Tarči that were suppressed by Golob’s administration. Public trust in the investigation of economic crimes, corruption among public officials, and organized crime remains low. Supporters of the law, such as communication office head Sebastjan Jeretič and former Prime Minister Anže Logar, argue that the establishment of SKOK (Special Criminal Office) is a necessary step toward effective anti-corruption efforts. The article criticizes the current state prosecutor and judiciary for being ineffective, while also highlighting concerns over the legal reasoning behind the proposed law.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as a necessary reform against corruption, supporting the establishment of SKOK as a response to systemic failures. It highlights criticisms of the current judicial system and portrays the opposition to the law as politically motivated. While it acknowledges public

DeloIndependent🔒Center3 hr. ago

The Supreme Court has called for reconsideration regarding the 'Skok' law, emphasizing that changes to the criminal procedure law are necessary to more effectively pursue the most serious offenses. Legal experts and prosecutors argue that the current legal framework is insufficient to address severe crimes efficiently. The call comes amid ongoing discussions about improving the justice system's ability to handle complex and high-stakes cases. This development highlights concerns over the effectiveness of existing procedures in combating serious criminal activities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view by citing legal experts and prosecutors who highlight the need for reform without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on procedural improvements rather than partisan issues, maintaining neutrality in its framing.

VečerIndependent🔒Center3 hr. ago

Predsednik vrhovnega sodišča Damjan Orož je izrazil zaskrbljenost glede predloga zakona o specializiranih sodiščih za obravnavo korupcijskih kaznivih dejanj in organiziranega kriminala (Skok). Orož meni, da bi ta predlog podaljšal čase reševanja kazenskih zadev in povzročil manjkovanje prehodnega obdobja za pripravo novega sodišča. Tudi rok ustanovitve sodišča 1. januarja 2027 je ocenjen kot nerealen in nevaren za stabilnost sodnega sistema. Vrhovno sodišče zahteva poseben neposredni odpor in poročila predsednika Specializiranega sodišča državnemu zboru, da bi se varovala neodvisnost sodstva. Orož opozorja, da obstaja še vedno problema z izločevanjem sodnikov in predodeljevanjem zadev, kar lahko vpliva na pravice obtoženca.

Bias read (Center): The article presents concerns raised by the Supreme Court president regarding a proposed law, but does not take a clear partisan stance. It reports on legal and procedural issues without overtly favoring any political side. The tone remains objective, focusing on the implications of the proposed law

DnevnikIndependent🔒Progressive4 hr. ago

The Slovenian government has proposed a law known as 'Skok' (Jump), which aims to restructure specialized state prosecutors into a new body focused on corruption and organized crime. The proposal has sparked strong reactions from prosecutors, judiciary institutions, independent organizations, and opposition parties. Critics argue that the law does not address the root causes of lengthy criminal proceedings but instead undermines the professional autonomy of prosecutors by increasing political influence over their appointments and potentially leading to new judicial delays. General State Prosecutor Katarina Bergant criticized the bill for reducing the independence of prosecutors and for being prepared in secrecy without involving experts or institutions directly affected. She noted that the law would remove current leadership mandates and replace them with appointments made by the government and parliament, excluding the chief prosecutor from the process. Specialized prosecutor Ivan Pridigar stated that while the organization would change, the new body would not gain significant additional authority over prosecuting complex crimes.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as an attempt to increase political control over prosecutorial appointments and reduce institutional independence, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of executive overreach. While the law is presented as a reform, the emphasis on undermining professional aut

VečerIndependent🔒Progressive5 hr. ago

The Slovenian Supreme Court and the Specialized State Prosecutor’s Office (SDT) have criticized a proposed law aimed at improving the fight against corruption and organized crime. They argue that the law does not strengthen anti-corruption efforts but instead weakens the independence of prosecutors by increasing political influence over staffing decisions. The law would reorganize the SDT into a new body called StKOK, change the naming and evaluation system for state prosecutors, and reduce the role of the General State Prosecutor in appointing leadership. Both institutions claim the law lacks meaningful reforms and fails to address systemic issues in the criminal justice system, such as prolonged legal proceedings. They emphasize that true improvements require comprehensive reforms to the Criminal Procedure Code rather than mere organizational changes.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as politically motivated and detrimental to judicial independence, emphasizing concerns about increased political influence over prosecutorial appointments. It highlights the perceived lack of substantive reform and criticizes the process of drafting the law, with

ReporterIndependentProgressive5 hr. ago

The article discusses concerns raised by General State Prosecutor Ana Bergant regarding a proposed law (Skok) aimed at restructuring specialized organs for handling corruption and organized crime cases. Bergant criticizes the law's secretive preparation process, lack of involvement with professional experts and relevant institutions, and its potential impact on the autonomy of the state prosecutor's office. She argues that the law would reduce the independence of prosecutors by allowing the Minister of Justice to influence staffing decisions without consulting the State Prosecution Council. The law also proposes changes to the internal structure of the state prosecution system, which Bergant claims could weaken the effectiveness of the prosecution service. Meanwhile, Ivan Pridigar, head of the Specialized State Prosecution Office (SDT), states that the law does not expand the scope of prosecuting serious crimes but rather introduces new internal support units for prosecutors.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as a significant threat to the independence of the prosecutorial system, emphasizing concerns about political influence over staffing decisions and organizational structure. It highlights the lack of transparency and consultation during the drafting process, which

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressive6 hr. ago

The proposed law on Skok has faced criticism from high-ranking legal figures in Slovenia. General State Prosecutor Katarina Bergant stated that the changes introduced by the law do not contribute to more efficient prosecution of criminal acts but rather weaken the professional autonomy of the prosecution by increasing political influence over the entire state prosecution system. The Supreme Court President, Damjan Orož, warned that adopting the law would significantly impact the level of legal security. He criticized the reassignment of criminal cases and noted numerous unresolved issues regarding the organization of the new specialized court. Bergant emphasized that the proposal was developed in secrecy without involving professional experts or relevant institutions. She pointed out that the content of the proposed law goes beyond its stated goals, altering not just the structure and appointment process of leadership and prosecutors at Skok but also changing the method of appointing all state prosecutors. According to her, this would systematically undermine the professional independence of the prosecution and allow the Minister of Justice, as a politically accountable figure, to

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents critical perspectives from legal authorities such as the General State Prosecutor and the President of the Supreme Court, who argue that the proposed law undermines judicial independence and increases political influence. These voices represent institutional legal authority, and

Žurnal24IndependentCenter6 hr. ago

The article discusses criticism of Slovenia's proposed law on the State Prosecution Office (StKOK), which aims to increase political influence over prosecutorial appointments and operations. General Prosecutor Katarina Bergant argues that the law undermines professional autonomy by giving more power to the Ministry of Justice in selecting prosecutors, rather than relying on the existing State Prosecution Council. Multiple institutions, including the State Attorney’s Office, the Human Rights Defender, and the Court of Auditors, have expressed concerns about the lack of transparency in drafting the law and the absence of input from legal experts. Critics argue that the law does not address core issues in criminal prosecution but instead strengthens political control over the judiciary. The opposition party 'Prerod' claims the law merely renames and restructures the current system without meaningful reform.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives—criticisms from legal professionals, institutions, and political groups—without overtly favoring any side. It highlights concerns about political influence and procedural flaws while quoting various stakeholders, maintaining a balanced tone.

DeloIndependent🔒Center6 hr. ago

The Supreme Court of Slovenia (VDT) and the Specialized State Prosecution Office (SDT) have criticized the proposed law on specialized organs for handling corruption and organized crime cases (StKOK), which was introduced by the government on July 15, 2026. Both institutions argue that the proposed changes do not bring significant improvements to the prosecution of complex criminal cases and warn of potential organizational and systemic changes that could affect the functioning of the state prosecution service. They highlight that the proposal was prepared without consultation with expert public and relevant authorities, and they question the justification for using urgent legislative procedures, as the conditions for this are not met. The VDT notes that the government did not have access to the official text but only to a version briefly published online, which may still have been revised before final approval. The proposal is seen as exceeding the goal of more effective fight against corruption and organized crime, as it would also interfere with the naming system of all state prosecutors. Key changes include removing the requirement for the Ministry to consult the State Prosecut

Bias read (Center): While the article presents criticism of a proposed law from two state prosecution offices, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It reports the concerns raised by these institutions without overtly endorsing or opposing their positions. The tone remains objective, focusing on the legal and/or

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenter21 hr. ago

The article discusses the debate over the proposed establishment of the Special Anti-Corruption Court (SKOK) in Slovenia. Anže Logar, leader of the Democratic Party and Minister of Economy, defends the initiative, stating that it aims to effectively combat serious corruption cases, including those involving members of the ruling structure. He argues that existing institutions are inefficient and that SKOK represents a clear commitment by the government to fight corruption. On the other hand, Lucija Tacer Perlin from the Freedom Movement criticizes the proposal, arguing that it grants excessive power to the Ministry of Justice and risks undermining judicial independence. She highlights concerns raised by legal professionals about the discretionary authority of the minister in appointing prosecutors and points out the absence of the Justice Minister in public discussions on this important issue.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives on the proposed SKOK court—support from the ruling party and criticism from the opposition—without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both Logar and Tacer Perlin, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the arguments made.