ON
← Back to feed
No double jeopardy: Ombudsman reopens file on 2019 SEA Games ‘anomalies’
PH🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressivenow

No double jeopardy: Ombudsman reopens file on 2019 SEA Games ‘anomalies’

The Ombudsman of the Philippines, Jesus Crispin Remulla, announced that the anti-graft body has reopened the investigation into alleged irregularities during the 2019 Southeast Asian Games. The probe focuses on issues such as unliquidated funds amounting to P10 billion, lack of competitive bidding for certain projects, and the controversial P50-million cauldron. This follows a statement by National Bureau of Investigation Director Melvin Matibag indicating an investigation into these anomalies. Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, who led the organizing body at the time, accused Matibag of attempting to intimidate him during an impeachment trial. Remulla emphasized that the 2021 investigation was not considered double jeopardy since it was not filed in court, and the case against former Public Works chief Vince Dizon was dismissed due to lack of evidence.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

6 reports

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 852 days ago
Cardinal Tagle to faithful: Resist ‘decay and corruption’

Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle delivered a sermon urging Catholics to resist 'decay and corruption' in society, emphasizing that only the Word of God can renew individuals and communities. His remarks were made during a religious ceremony marking the 30th sacerdotal anniversary of Msgr. Erwin Jose Balagapo at the Our Lady of Lourdes Parish in Tacloban City. The sermon came amid ongoing national concerns about corruption, particularly surrounding Vice President Sara Duterte, who is undergoing an impeachment trial over allegations of financial misconduct. While Tagle did not directly address political figures, he framed corruption as a moral and spiritual crisis. He drew upon biblical teachings, including the Parable of the Sower and St. Paul’s writings, to highlight the enduring power of faith and hope amidst societal challenges.

Bias read (Center): Although the article addresses corruption—a politically charged issue—the framing remains balanced, focusing on moral and spiritual dimensions rather than taking a partisan stance. The mention of Vice President Duterte's impeachment trial introduces a political context, but the article does not take

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factually accurate about Cardinal Tagle's sermon and societal corruption. Objectively presented without political bias.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 858 days ago
Ortega’s takeaway on Duterte’s statements: She likes ‘blood’

House Deputy Speaker Paolo Ortega V interpreted Vice President Sara Duterte's comments during an impeachment trial discussion as indicating a preference for 'blood'-related topics, such as bloodbaths or being bloodied. During a press briefing, Ortega humorously suggested that Duterte's favorite drink might be Bloody Mary, implying a thematic connection between her remarks and blood-related imagery. The comment appears to be a lighthearted critique of Duterte's rhetoric rather than a direct statement on the impeachment proceedings. The exchange highlights the informal tone used by political figures in discussing serious legislative matters.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Duterte's statements through a humorous and potentially critical lens, suggesting a dismissive or mocking attitude toward her emphasis on 'blood' during the impeachment trial. While not overtly partisan, the framing leans left by highlighting Duterte's controversial rhetoric in a輕

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factually correct about Gloria Arroyo's stance on Remulla's impeachment. Objectively presented without political bias.

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 756 days ago
What Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial means for families of drug war victims

Families of victims of Rodrigo Duterte's drug war in Caloocan City are calling for Vice President Sara Duterte to be held accountable as her impeachment trial begins. The trial involves allegations of death threats against high-profile figures, misuse of confidential funds, unexplained wealth, and bribery. These families hope the Senate impeachment court will convict Sara Duterte, preventing her from holding public office again. The drug war under Duterte's leadership led to numerous extrajudicial killings, including the case of 9-year-old Lenin Baylon, who was killed by a stray bullet during the conflict. Progressive groups are demanding justice and accountability for these crimes.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the impeachment trial of Sara Duterte through the lens of accountability for human rights violations and corruption, emphasizing the demands of victims' families and progressive groups. It uses strong language such as 'violations of human rights,' 'corruption,' and 'abuses,' while

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the involvement of drug war victims' families and their demands for accountability. It references specific details from the primary source, such as the charges against Duterte and the context of the trial. There is no significant deviation from the facts.

Why objectivity (75): The article has a clear emotional undertone, particularly in the quotes from the victims' families. This emotional framing leans toward supporting accountability and criticizes the Duterte administration, which affects neutrality.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 829 days ago
Gloria Arroyo says she’d vote against Ombudsman Remulla’s impeachment

Former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo stated she would vote against an impeachment resolution targeting Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla. She clarified this stance in response to online reports suggesting she was involved in plotting against Remulla. Arroyo emphasized that impeachments are political and that voting against Remulla's impeachment would be her response. She highlighted their historical alliance, noting Remulla's support during her presidency and his role in the Second People Power Revolution. Arroyo's legal counsel confirmed she denies any knowledge or involvement in planned impeachment efforts. The Ombudsman has not commented on the allegations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Arroyo's position without overtly endorsing or criticizing it, maintaining a balanced tone by including her statements and the context of their past relationship. While the subject involves political figures and potential impeachment, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 82): Accurately reports on subpoena requests for Duterte's financial records. Objectivity maintained through neutral reporting.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 802 days ago
Lotoc: Actual sedition not required to charge inciting to sedition vs VP Duterte

Vice President Sara Duterte faces an incitement to sedition charge from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), according to NBI Regional Director Jeremy Lotoc. During a hearing related to Duterte's impeachment, Lotoc clarified that actual sedition is not required for such charges, emphasizing that intent to overthrow the government or disrupt public order suffices. He argued that Duterte's alleged comments about hiring a hitman to target President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and others pose a threat to public safety and governmental stability. Lotoc highlighted the role of public officials as models and warned that unchecked behavior by leaders could lead to broader societal unrest.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal reasoning behind the incitement to sedition charge without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. It reports on the legal interpretation provided by an official (Jeremy Lotoc) and contextualizes it within the ongoing impeachment proceedings. While the subject is

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 80): Accurately reports on Lotoc's testimony regarding incitement charges. Objectivity slightly compromised by focus on legal proceedings.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow
No double jeopardy: Ombudsman reopens file on 2019 SEA Games ‘anomalies’

The Ombudsman of the Philippines, Jesus Crispin Remulla, announced that the anti-graft body has reopened the investigation into alleged irregularities during the 2019 Southeast Asian Games. The probe focuses on issues such as unliquidated funds amounting to P10 billion, lack of competitive bidding for certain projects, and the controversial P50-million cauldron. This follows a statement by National Bureau of Investigation Director Melvin Matibag indicating an investigation into these anomalies. Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, who led the organizing body at the time, accused Matibag of attempting to intimidate him during an impeachment trial. Remulla emphasized that the 2021 investigation was not considered double jeopardy since it was not filed in court, and the case against former Public Works chief Vince Dizon was dismissed due to lack of evidence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about ongoing investigations into past corruption allegations related to the 2019 SEA Games without overtly favoring any political side. It includes multiple perspectives, such as the Ombudsman's actions, the NBI director's announcement, and the senator's accusations

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories