ON
← Back to feed
Winning for French children under 15 to continue using social networks
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

Winning for French children under 15 to continue using social networks

Francoski ustavni svet je ocenil, da zakon, ki ga zagovarja predsednik Emmanuel Macron, nesorazmerno posega v svobodo izražanja in ne zagotavlja dovolj zaščite zasebnosti. Zakon predvidel preprostjo uporabo družbenih omrežij za otroke mlajših od 15 let, kar je bil odvržen zaradi nepopolnosti. Macron je ob tem izrazil zvestobo svojim podpornikom in napovedal nadaljnjo delo na reformi. Elizajski palata je naročila premierju Sebastienu Lecornu, naj pripravi nov osnutek zakona, ki bo spoštovao ustavni sodni odločitev in evropski regulativni okvir. V drugih državah, kot so Avstralia, Avstrija, Španija, Italija in Slovenija, so razvijale podobne politike glede omejitve uporabe družbenih omrežij za otroke.

France’s constitutional council has blocked a proposed law aimed at restricting access to social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram for individuals under the age of 15. The ruling, announced by French media outlet AFP, states that the legislation violates freedom of expression and fails to provide sufficient safeguards for privacy. President Emmanuel Macron had previously endorsed the law in July, expressing gratitude to lawmakers for their support and pledging to implement the reforms by September. However, following the constitutional council's decision, Macron has instructed Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne to draft a new, legally sound version of the legislation that aligns with both the court’s ruling and European regulatory frameworks. The president remains committed to advancing the reform, despite the setback. The original proposal sought to introduce a two-step process for enforcing restrictions on social media usage. Starting from September 1st, individuals under 15 would have been prevented from creating new accounts on these platforms. Existing accounts would have faced similar restrictions beginning January 1st, 2027. This measure was intended to protect minors from potential harms associated with online activity, including exposure to inappropriate content and cyberbullying. However, the constitutional council found the law lacking in defining clear criteria for verifying users' ages and ensuring compliance with these requirements, which led to its rejection. Macron has acknowledged the need for revisions to the law and has tasked Borne with preparing a revised draft by the end of the year. Despite the constitutional council’s decision, the initial proposal received broad parliamentary backing, with majorities in both chambers supporting the initiative. Nevertheless, legal compliance remains a prerequisite for implementation. The ruling highlights the challenges of balancing digital regulation with constitutional rights, particularly in the context of youth protection policies. Other countries have also considered similar measures to restrict children’s access to social media. Australia became the first nation to fully prohibit access to social media platforms for individuals under 16 years old in December of last year. Several European nations, including Austria, Spain, Italy, and Slovenia, have since expressed interest in implementing comparable regulations. These efforts reflect growing concerns over the impact of social media on young users and the need for protective legislative action. In response to the constitutional council’s ruling, public discourse has centered around the balance between safeguarding minors and preserving fundamental freedoms. Some commentators argue that the decision underscores the importance of maintaining democratic institutions capable of scrutinizing executive initiatives. Others emphasize the necessity of refining legislation to ensure it meets constitutional standards while addressing legitimate societal concerns. Efforts to revise the law will require careful consideration of technical and legal complexities surrounding age verification mechanisms. Ensuring that such systems are both effective and compliant with data protection laws presents a significant challenge. As discussions continue, the government faces pressure to develop a framework that satisfies judicial oversight while fulfilling public health and safety objectives. The outcome of this process will determine whether France proceeds with its digital regulation agenda in alignment with constitutional principles.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Slo-Tech logoSlo-TechIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 709 days ago
In France, a law banning the use of social networks for children has been dropped

Francoski ustavni svet je blokiral predlog zakona, ki bi omejil dostop do družbenih omrežij za mlajše od 15 let. Ustavni svet je ocenil, da zakon v trenutni obliki omejuje svobodo izražanja, ker zahteva od vsakih uporabnikov, tudi polnoletnih, da dokažejo svojo starost, brez jasno definiranega postopka ali varovalk. Predsednik Macron je napovedal popravke zakona, ki naj bodo pripravljene do konca leta. Trenutni predlog zakona je bil podprt z veliko večino v parlamentu, a ni zadel ustavnih predpisov. Avstralija je prvica na svetu s podobno ureditvijo, medtem ko se podobna zakonodaja pripravlja tudi v drugih evropskih državah in na ravnu EU.

Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje politično kontroverzno ureditev, vendar ne prikazuje enstranskega stališč. Poudarek je na decenziji in svobodi izražanja, kar je politično naloženo, vendar ne predstavlja enstranskega stališč. Ustavni svet je odrezal predlog, kar kaže na nepristransko ocenjevanje, medtem ko se predst

Why factuality (88): This article accurately describes the constitutional council's rejection of the law, citing Bloomberg and providing details on the specific concerns raised (freedom of speech, lack of age verification mechanisms). It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides additional context about the su

Why objectivity (70): While primarily factual, the article includes user comments that express personal opinions and criticisms, which introduces a subjective element. The mention of Macron's political motivations (e.g., wanting to pass the law before elections) adds a political angle that may skew the neutrality of the

Slovenske novice logoSlovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago
Winning for French children under 15 to continue using social networks

Francoski ustavni svet je ocenil, da zakon, ki ga zagovarja predsednik Emmanuel Macron, nesorazmerno posega v svobodo izražanja in ne zagotavlja dovolj zaščite zasebnosti. Zakon predvidel preprostjo uporabo družbenih omrežij za otroke mlajših od 15 let, kar je bil odvržen zaradi nepopolnosti. Macron je ob tem izrazil zvestobo svojim podpornikom in napovedal nadaljnjo delo na reformi. Elizajski palata je naročila premierju Sebastienu Lecornu, naj pripravi nov osnutek zakona, ki bo spoštovao ustavni sodni odločitev in evropski regulativni okvir. V drugih državah, kot so Avstralia, Avstrija, Španija, Italija in Slovenija, so razvijale podobne politike glede omejitve uporabe družbenih omrežij za otroke.

Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje politično debato o zakonu, ki ga predsednik Macron zagovarja, vendar ne izraža nobene stranske podpore ali kritike. Poudarek je na dejstvu, da je ustavni svet odvržen zakon zaradi nesorazmerja med svobodo izražanja in zaščito zasebnosti. Artikel ne izraža nobene stranske podpore, amp

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the French Constitutional Council ruling that President Macron's law restricting social media use by minors under 15 years old was unconstitutional due to violations of freedom of expression and lack of privacy protections. It cites AFP as the source and aligns with the cross-

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts neutrally but includes quotes from officials and mentions public reactions in comments, which may introduce some bias. While not overtly opinionated, the focus on Macron's determination and the implications of the ruling could be seen as slightly favoring his position.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories