ON
← Back to feed
US Supreme Court won’t halt $656 million judgment against Palestinians over terror attacks
World🏛️ PoliticsCenter12 hr. ago

US Supreme Court won’t halt $656 million judgment against Palestinians over terror attacks

The U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor refused to block a $655.5 million judgment requiring Palestinian authorities to pay damages to victims of terror attacks in Israel between 2002 and 2004. The ruling allows the case to proceed despite appeals by the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, who argue the financial burden would destabilize government services in the West Bank. The lawsuit stems from attacks during the Second Intifada that killed 33 people and injured many more. The Supreme Court previously upheld a 2019 law enabling such lawsuits, allowing U.S. citizens to seek compensation for terrorist acts, including those related to Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack. The plaintiffs aim to collect funds from Palestinian taxes collected by Israel, which have been withheld, further straining the region.

1 reports

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentCenter12 hr. ago
US Supreme Court won’t halt $656 million judgment against Palestinians over terror attacks

The U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor refused to block a $655.5 million judgment requiring Palestinian authorities to pay damages to victims of terror attacks in Israel between 2002 and 2004. The ruling allows the case to proceed despite appeals by the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, who argue the financial burden would destabilize government services in the West Bank. The lawsuit stems from attacks during the Second Intifada that killed 33 people and injured many more. The Supreme Court previously upheld a 2019 law enabling such lawsuits, allowing U.S. citizens to seek compensation for terrorist acts, including those related to Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack. The plaintiffs aim to collect funds from Palestinian taxes collected by Israel, which have been withheld, further straining the region.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and arguments from both sides without overtly favoring either the plaintiffs or the Palestinian authorities. It includes quotes and positions from both parties and does not use biased language or selectively omit context.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories