Scroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908/9/2026The Indian government clarified that consumers using the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) for person-to-person transactions will remain free of charge. This statement followed the passage of the Taxation and Other Laws Amendment Bill 2026, which allows banks to impose charges on UPI and RuPay debit card transactions. While merchants may face a 'nominal' Merchant Discount Rate, the government assured that these charges will be significantly lower than those for credit and debit card transactions. The bill aims to support the long-term sustainability of UPI by improving cybersecurity, fraud prevention, and digital infrastructure, while also promoting competition within the UPI ecosystem. The government rejected claims that external influences were driving policy changes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from official government sources and provides balanced context regarding the proposed changes to UPI transaction fees. It explains both the potential impact on merchants and the government’s justification for the policy change. There is no clear ideological slant in措
Why factuality (95): This article presents the government's clarification consistently with other sources, detailing that UPI will remain free for users and that MDR may apply to limited merchant transactions. It includes specifics on the threshold and comparison to other payment methods.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the government's statements without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/9/2026The Indian government clarified that users of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) will continue to pay no transaction charges, while most merchant transactions will remain free. It stated that any potential merchant discount rate (MDR) would apply only to a limited number of high-value transactions at a low rate, below typical credit and debit card rates. This clarification follows amendments to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, which sparked concerns about introducing fees on UPI transactions. The government emphasized that the amendment is an 'enabling provision' and does not directly impose charges. The decision comes after the Lok Sabha passed a bill allowing the government to permit charges on UPI transactions, with the final determination to be made by the UPI and Services Steering Committee led by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI).
Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's stance on UPI fee policies without overtly favoring either side. While the issue of charging for UPI transactions is politically sensitive, the report remains balanced by quoting the government's explanation and acknowledging the debate around the amendment to P
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the government's clarification on UPI fees, citing the amendment to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, and the proposed framework for MDR. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that UPI remains free for most users and that any MDR would be threshold-base
Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral, presenting the government's position without overt bias. It explains the rationale behind potential MDRs without taking sides, maintaining a balanced perspective.
India
![[Video] Aljuš Pertinač: If Janša is passive, the opposition has problems (Echo weekly, 16 October 2026)](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.domovina.je%2Fslike%2Fmedium%2Fmaxresdefault-62.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
