Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday struck down a lawsuit brought by the Adolphus Wabara-led Board of Trustees (BoT) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), seeking to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize and publish the interim National Working Committee (NWC) led by Kabiru Turaki. The court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked the legal standing to initiate the action, dismissing the suit as an abuse of judicial process. The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1159/2026, was filed by Wabara, along with other BoT members and party stakeholders, including the Secretary of the BoT, former Governor Muazu Babangida Aliyu of Niger, ex-Minister of Information Prof. Jerry Gana, and several chieftains of the PDP. They argued that INEC was legally obligated to recognize the Turaki-led NWC based on Section 287 of the Constitution and Article 32(5)(a)(i) of the PDP Constitution. The plaintiffs sought declarations that INEC was bound to acknowledge the NWC, update its database with the names of its members, and accept all official communications from the body. The court, presided over by Justice Salim Ibrahim, rejected these claims, stating that the plaintiffs' case rested on the assumption that INEC was already under a legal obligation to recognize the NWC, an assumption they failed to substantiate. The judge emphasized that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated that such an obligation existed or that INEC had ever recognized the NWC or received any court order directing it to do so. He also noted that the Supreme Court judgment cited by the plaintiffs did not constitute an order compelling INEC to act. Furthermore, the judge ruled that the plaintiffs had not shown that the Turaki-led NWC was the lawful leadership of the PDP capable of representing the party in dealings with INEC. As a result, the court upheld the preliminary objections raised by INEC and the Wike-backed PDP leadership, finding that the plaintiffs lacked the required locus standi to pursue the action. The Wike-aligned faction, which asserts itself as the authentic leadership of the PDP, had challenged the court's jurisdiction to entertain the case. They applied to be joined as defendants, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked the legal right to institute the action. The court granted their applications, joining Alhaji Abdulrahman Mohammed, the National Chairman of the Wike-backed faction, along with Senator Samuel Anyanwu, the National Secretary, and Kamaldeen Ajibade, the National Legal Adviser. Additional applications were made by Austin Nwachukwu, Abraham Amah Nnanna, and George Turnah, who were deemed necessary parties due to their potential interest in the outcome of the proceedings. The court accepted these applications, ensuring that all relevant stakeholders were included in the litigation. In a related development, the court also imposed a fine of N140 million on the Wabara-led BoT for filing a frivolous suit. Justice Ibrahim ruled that the action was an abuse of court process and unmeritorious, aligning with the principle that “cost follows event.” Additionally, the court ordered the plaintiffs' counsel, Chris Uche, to pay N10 million to deter future frivolous filings involving the internal affairs of political parties. The case highlights ongoing tensions within the PDP regarding leadership and the legitimacy of different factions. With the court striking down the suit and imposing penalties, the legal battle appears to have reached a definitive conclusion, leaving the Wike-backed leadership in a stronger position within the party. The implications of this ruling could influence the trajectory of the party’s internal dynamics ahead of upcoming elections.
6 reports
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9015 days agoA Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed a lawsuit brought by Adolphus Wabara's faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), which sought recognition of their leadership by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Justice Salim Ibrahim ruled the suit an 'abuse of court process' and noted the plaintiffs failed to establish entitlement to the relief sought. The court also rejected the claimants' jurisdiction, affirming the leadership of the PDP faction aligned with FCT Minister Nyesom Wike. The plaintiffs included former Senate President Wabara and other senior party figures, but the court struck out their claim, citing lack of authority to represent the party.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's ruling without overt ideological slant, focusing on legal arguments and procedural aspects. While the subject involves political factions within a major party, the framing remains neutral, presenting both sides' positions without clear editorial favoritism toward any
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the court's decision dismissing the PDP leadership suit. It includes relevant legal terminology and aligns with the cross-source consensus that the court ruled against the plaintiffs' request for INEC recognition.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the court's ruling without favoring either the plaintiffs or the defendants. It focuses on the legal outcome rather than taking a stance on the parties involved.
The PunchIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9015 days agoA Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed a lawsuit seeking to force the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize and publish the Kabiru Turaki-led interim National Working Committee (NWC) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The case, filed by PDP Board of Trustees chairman Adolphus Wabara and others, argued that INEC was legally obligated to recognize the committee based on previous judicial rulings. However, Justice Salim Ibrahim ruled that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing and failed to prove that INEC had any existing legal duty to recognize the committee. The court upheld preliminary objections from INEC and members of the Wike-backed PDP leadership, stating that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate that the committee represented the lawful leadership of the party or that INEC had been directed to recognize it.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced legal analysis of the court's decision without overtly favoring either side. It reports the arguments from both the plaintiffs and the opposing parties, including INEC and the Wike-backed leadership, without taking a clear ideological stance. The framing focuses on法律和
Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys the court's decision to strike out the suit due to lack of legal standing by the plaintiffs. It includes relevant details such as the judge's name, the court location, and the identities of the main plaintiffs. The content matches the other articles and reflects the cr
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, focusing on the legal reasoning behind the court's decision. There is no evident bias or emotional language used, making the report objective and balanced.
Vanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9015 days agoA Nigerian court has rejected a lawsuit filed by supporters of Senator Adolphus Wabara, seeking to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize the interim National Working Committee (NWC) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) led by Tanimu Turaki. The case, numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/1159/2026, was brought by members of the Wabara-led Board of Trustees, including former governors, ministers, and party officials, who argued that INEC should acknowledge the Turaki-led leadership based on constitutional provisions. The court ruled against the plaintiffs, dismissing the suit and rejecting their request for INEC to update its records and publish the interim NWC. The Wike-aligned faction of the PDP challenged the court’s jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to bring the case.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the PDP leadership dispute without overtly favoring either faction. It reports on the legal arguments presented by both the Wabara-led group and the Wike-backed faction, providing balanced coverage of the court's decision and the competing claims. There is no clear
Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the court's rejection of the suit, providing the judge's name, the court location, and the nature of the plaintiffs' request. It includes specific details like the date of the suit filing and the identities of the main plaintiffs, which match the other articles. The
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, focusing on the legal aspects of the case without injecting personal opinions or emotional language. It presents the court's decision objectively, without apparent bias toward either side.
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8514 days ago PDP Leadership Suit: Court fines Wabara, others N140m, awards N10m against lawyerThe Federal High Court in Abuja ruled against the Adolphus Wabara-led Board of Trustees (BoT) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), fining them N140 million for filing a frivolous lawsuit against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The court dismissed the suit as an 'abuse of court process' and ordered the plaintiffs' lawyer, Chris Uche, to pay N10 million to deter similar actions. The lawsuit aimed to compel INEC to recognize the PDP's interim National Working Committee (NWC) led by Kabiru Turaki. The case involved multiple legal challenges, including disputes over jurisdiction and the inclusion of various PDP factions and officials as defendants. The ruling highlights ongoing tensions within the PDP regarding leadership and internal governance.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the court's decision, detailing both the plaintiffs' claims and the defendants' counterarguments. It does not overtly favor any particular political faction but focuses on the legal proceedings and judicial reasoning. While the subject matter involves high-
Why factuality (90): The article provides detailed information about the court's ruling, including the N140 million fine imposed on the Wabara-led BoT and the N10 million award against the lawyer. These figures are consistent with the other articles. However, it lacks some contextual details present in other reports, su
Why objectivity (85): While the article remains largely factual, it emphasizes the financial penalties imposed on the plaintiffs, which may subtly highlight the severity of the court's response. This could be seen as slightly favoring the defendants but does not constitute strong bias.
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago Amaechi withdraws suit challenging Atiku’s emergence as ADC presidential candidateThe Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed a lawsuit filed by former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, who challenged the selection of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) for the 2027 election. Amaechi, who finished second in the ADC’s presidential primary election in June, withdrew his suit through his lawyer, citing that the parties had resolved their differences. The court ruled to strike out the case as requested. Amaechi had argued that the primary election violated electoral laws and the party’s internal guidelines, and he sought a new primary election. He claimed to be the rightful winner and demanded that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) not recognize Abubakar as the ADC’s candidate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and the withdrawal of the lawsuit without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual information about the court's decision and the background of the dispute without apparent ideological slant. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal and选举
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the withdrawal of the suit by Amaechi and the subsequent court ruling. It includes specific details such as the court location, the judge's name, and the reason for the withdrawal. However, it omits some procedural details found in other articles, such as the exact con
Why objectivity (85): The article remains mostly neutral in tone, though it focuses more on the outcome of the case (withdrawal) than on the legal arguments themselves. This focus might slightly emphasize the resolution over the process, but it does not strongly favor one side.
Vanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8010 days ago Anti-Tinubu Post: Court rejects Sowore’s uncertified exhibitsThe Federal High Court in Abuja dismissed Omoyele Sowore's attempt to introduce un-certified documents as evidence during his trial on cybercrime charges related to a social media post criticizing President Bola Tinubu. The documents, which included a summary of proceedings and letters, were challenged by the prosecution, arguing they lacked proper certification under the Evidence Act. The court ruled against Sowore, emphasizing the need for certification to ensure document integrity. Another DSS witness testified about a letter requesting removal of Sowore's post, citing concerns over public unrest, though he could not specify individuals affected.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual legal proceeding without overt ideological slant. It reports on the court's rejection of Sowore's evidence based on procedural grounds rather than political affiliation. While the case involves high-profile figures and sensitive political content, the framing remains客观
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the legal proceedings involving Omoyele Sowore and the rejection of his uncertified exhibits by the court. It provides details about the charges, the defense's attempt to introduce evidence, and the prosecution's objection based on certification requirements. The infor
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both sides of the argument (defense and prosecution) without apparent bias. It uses formal language appropriate for legal reporting and avoids emotionally charged language, though it does take a slight editorial stance by highlighting the court's deci
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
NG
