Obasanjo still angry over failed 3rd term bid – Atiku

Vanguard NigeriaIndependentProgressive3 hr. ago

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar accused former President Olusegun Obasanjo of being bitter over the rejection of Obasanjo's third-term agenda, which Atiku claims he fought to prevent. In a statement, Atiku recounted supporting Obasanjo during his imprisonment, providing financial and material assistance upon his release, and helping rebuild his political career. He criticized Obasanjo for regretting his choice of Atiku as vice president and emphasized his commitment to constitutional principles and democratic governance. Atiku also highlighted praise from international figures like WTO Director Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala for his economic leadership, suggesting Obasanjo's criticism comes at an inopportune time.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Atiku's actions as principled defense of democracy and constitutionality, emphasizing his moral and political sacrifices. It highlights Obasanjo's regret and perceived bitterness, implying a lack of integrity. The focus on Atiku's contributions and the critique of Obasanjo's past,

Vanguard NigeriaIndependentCenter3 hr. ago

Atiku Abubakar, a presidential candidate and former Vice President of Nigeria, responded to criticisms from former President Olusegun Obasanjo regarding his opposition to Obasanjo's push for a third term in office. Atiku emphasized that his resistance to the third-term agenda was a defense of Nigeria's constitution and democracy, not a personal vendetta. He recalled supporting Obasanjo during his time in prison and aiding him after his release, highlighting his loyalty despite their eventual political differences. Atiku criticized Obasanjo for expressing regret over appointing him as vice president, arguing that his actions were in line with constitutional principles. He also referenced praise from Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, for his economic leadership, suggesting Obasanjo's criticism comes at an inconvenient time.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Atiku's defense of his constitutional stance and Obasanjo's critique—without overtly favoring one side. The framing is balanced, focusing on historical context and mutual claims without loaded language or one-sided sourcing.

The PunchIndependentCenter4 hr. ago

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar responded to former President Olusegun Obasanjo's criticism of their past collaboration, denying allegations that his decision to oppose Obasanjo's third-term bid was a mistake. Atiku defended his stance against the third-term agenda, emphasizing his commitment to constitutional democracy over personal loyalty. He highlighted his support for Obasanjo during his imprisonment and subsequent political revival, asserting that his actions were in the national interest. Atiku rejected Obasanjo's attempts to rewrite history, claiming that the fight against the third-term agenda was about preserving Nigeria's democratic institutions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced exchange between two former leaders, focusing on historical interpretation rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While both figures hold strong positions, the narrative does not favor one side over the other, maintaining neutrality in framing the conflict.