A federal court in New York has invalidated the visa suspension imposed by former President Donald Trump’s administration on citizens of 75 countries, ruling that the policy was unlawful and that the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, overstepped his legal authority. The decision came after a detailed 61-page ruling by Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Southern District of New York, who declared the ban “manifestly illegal.” The judge criticized the administration's justification that applicants from these nations posed a high risk of becoming an economic burden on the United States. She noted that even individuals meeting all requirements and likely to be self-sufficient were denied visas under the policy, violating regulations requiring case-by-case evaluations. The affected countries included several in Latin America and the Caribbean such as Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Guatemala, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Uruguay, as well as Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Morocco, Nigeria, Russia, Somalia, Thailand, and Yemen. The policy had been implemented earlier this year and had led to widespread disruption for families and communities across the globe. Five Colombian professionals whose visa applications were rejected under the new policy joined six U.S. citizens whose family members were impacted in Ghana, Jamaica, Guatemala, and Ethiopia in challenging the measure. According to reports, the court’s ruling could lead to the reconsideration of thousands of previously processed visa applications. Joanna Cuevas Ingram, a senior attorney with the National Immigration Law Center, called the decision a significant victory for hundreds of thousands of families around the world whose lives had been thrown into chaos due to an illegal and discriminatory policy. She emphasized that immigration laws should not be used to justify discrimination. Skye Perryman, president and executive director of the non-profit organization Democracy Forward, described the ruling as a clear rejection of a policy that caused substantial harm to families and communities nationwide. She stated that the Trump-Vance administration could not exploit immigration law to block entire countries, separate families, and deny constitutional rights without accountability. The Department of State and the White House have yet to comment on the judicial decision. A spokesperson for the Department of State told reporters that they typically do not make statements regarding ongoing or pending legal cases. However, the official reiterated that the Trump administration protects American citizens by maintaining strict evaluation and verification standards for visa applicants. The visa suspension had been in effect since January and had significantly disrupted international travel and family reunification efforts. The court’s ruling not only nullifies the immediate effects of the policy but also raises questions about its legality and potential future implications. Legal experts suggest that the decision could set a precedent for similar challenges against other restrictive immigration policies. As the situation develops, further legal actions or responses from the government may emerge, potentially influencing future immigration legislation and enforcement practices.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
Spain
